Apple challenges Woolies logo

Apple has protested the use of Woolworths' new apple-shaped trademark, which looks similar to the well-known brand image loved by Mac fans worldwide.

The logos in question
(Credit: Woolworths and Apple)

Woolworths lodged the new trademark last year in August: the letter w, formed in the shape of a peeled apple with a leaf on top. Although IP Australia — the Australian intellectual property administrator — made public in December that it had accepted Woolworths' application for the trademark (for the supermarket to be able to keep it), it next needed to withstand any opposition it might encounter.

Unfortunately for Woolworths, Apple didn't like the similarity of the revamped brand to its own carefully guarded stamp and filed opposition to the registration, which also covered product categories such as computers, in March.

As yet, however, Apple has failed to provide supporting evidence for its claim. It had been called upon to provide its reasons for opposition in June, according to an IP Australia database, but received an extension until September. It seems that the company has also recently asked for another extension. IP Australia's database did not make it clear as to whether that extension has been granted. An IP Australia spokesperson was unable to provide clarification on this issue at the time of publication.

Once evidence has been heard, generally there will be a hearing after which a decision is reached, according to the IP Australia website. Appeals to the decisions go to the Federal Court.

Woolworths would not comment on the matter other than to say that it would await IP Australia's decision. Apple did not respond to requests for comment at the time of publication.

Apple has been embroiled in another intellectual property case this year. It filed an appeal in the Federal Court at the start of 2009 when IP Australia ruled that the opposition by computer equipment supplier Macpro Computers to Apple registering the trademark name "MacPro" was founded. The case is ongoing.

Advertisement

Talkback 21 comments

    I don't think Steve Jobs invented the apple Gili -- 06/10/09

    I'm pretty sure apples were around before Steve Jobs, and if my memory serves me correct, it was first invented by God, so it would seem that Apple Computer is not the owner of the trademark after all.

    And unlike Apple Computer, Woolworths actually does sell apples! You can't trademark a generic item like an apple across all industries. Those two logos would not be confused with each other in a pink fit!

    GO HOME APPLE!

    Apple Steve Johnson -- 12/10/09 (in reply to #320361917)

    Good point Gili (except maybe the God bit).

    What about The Beatles 'Apple Records' and 'Apple Corps'? Pretty iconic green apple logo ...

    Apple should drop this case ... Rob V -- 06/10/09

    When placed side by side, the similarities can be seen. But when seen apart, the logos are as individual as they come.

    I'd be surpised if Woolies lose this one. The likely outcome is their logo will remain the same. At worst, they may have to trim off the leaf from their apple!

    The Great Bite Anonymous -- 06/10/09

    At least the Woollies logo isn't missing a piece that was bitten off!

    Tony of Victoria - The No-Water State

    Great bite Simon -- 12/10/09 (in reply to #320361982)

    Thats because Woolies apples are so old and kept in storage soo long that nobody wants to take a bite!

    I guess they need to distance themselves from "Woolies, the fresh food people" as that is just a blatant lie!

    Not an Apple Anonymous -- 06/10/09

    Woolworths logo is a combination of a Cabbage and Apple. I can't see how Apple can win this one.

    Barking up the wrong tree Anonymous -- 07/10/09

    I think Apple are barking up the wrong (apple) tree on this one.

    Apple challenges Woolies logo Anonymous -- 07/10/09

    does apple really think they could win this? or are they using lawsuits as marketting ploys?

    Bloody litigious Americans Some Guy -- 07/10/09

    Apple is based in California, so sense or sensibility does not come into it. These are litigation happy yanks, bothering the rest of the world.

    Apple should concentrate on making their product work properly (Snow Leopard fiasco!) instead of lawyering people.

    Not the first ridiculous challenge, won't be the last Anonymous -- 08/10/09

    Same thing last year with a Canadian school. The school's logo has not changed.

    http://news.softpedia.com/news/Apple-Sues-Canadian-School-over-Apple-Shaped-Logo-95109.shtml

    Apple is right Anonymous -- 09/10/09 (in reply to #320372687)

    If Woolworths was an IT company these logos may be considered too similar.

    Apple have a genuine case because Woolworths have applied for the trademark in IT-related categories (not just food, packaging, clothing etc).

    Blind as a bat Mel Sommersberg -- 09/10/09 (in reply to #320374458)

    The shape is different. The texture is different. The colour is VERY different. What looks similar? The Woolies logo doesn't even look anything remotely like an apple, even if it is supposed to be one.

    Apple have no case against Woolworths at all. This is just a matter of a foreign company throwing their weight around but fortunately Woolworths have the money to take Apple on and hopefully beat them.

    If Apple concentrated more on product quality instead of just making them look fancy then they'd be far better off and more popular with discerning consumers who have put up with iffy software, exploding magnetic power plugs and cracking LCD screens.

    Apple: pack your bags and **** off.

    Apple is anal and wrong Anonymous -- 13/10/09 (in reply to #320374458)

    "If Woolworths was an IT company these logos may be considered too similar."

    Right and if Apple was a grocery retailer they'd no doubt have a computer for a logo.

    No confusion for me. Mic -- 09/10/09

    Woolworths have been using that symbol on receipts for a while now, and while I have some "Apple Mac" equipment, I've never confused either symbol with the other.

    Here's a better one mrq -- 09/10/09

    If anyone wants to sue for copyright infringement, it should be Wertheim:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wertheim_vacuum_cleaner

    Same font, same graduated use of the same colour, both depicting depth - one's pretty much an inverse of the other, with tweaks.

    Wertheim, whatheim? Anonymous -- 09/10/09 (in reply to #320374566)

    Except that Wertheim doesn't exist... it's just a brand with nothing behind it, no company and no factories. It's a department, if that, of the Australian Vacuum Cleaner Company Pty Ltd (better known as Godfreys). I don't know how many people work 'for' Wertheim, but I'm betting that they could all fit into one cab on the way to the christmas party. Not really big enough to take on one of the biggest companies in Australia.

    What next? Anonymous -- 09/10/09

    Goatse sues Westnet?

    Wertheim, whatheim? Anonymous -- 10/10/09

    Except that Wertheim doesn't exist... it's just a brand with nothing behind it, no company and no factories. It's just a department, if that, of the Australian Vacuum Cleaner Company Pty Ltd (better known as Godfreys). I don't know how many people work 'for' Wertheim, but I'm betting that they could all fit into one cab on the way to the christmas party. Not really big enough to take on one of the biggest companies in Australia.

    Suprised they haven't sued God Anonymous -- 12/10/09

    and asked him to re-create his apples differenlty as they look too similar to their logo!!

    Woolworths logo Anonymous -- 14/10/09

    The Woolworths logo is actually remincent of the old Woolworths/BigW logo that was used during the 1970's and eary 1980's. So, Apple don't have a case......

    Who cares? Anonymous -- 21/10/09

    Woolworths have been destroying the little guy in this country by lowering prices below what the smaller shops can handle and then increasing significantly more. I say Woolies STFU & GTFO, kthxbi :)

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • David Braue Welcome to National Censorship Day
    Conroy's blind adherence to his net filtering plan will abandon net neutrality ideals and push ISPs down a slippery slope of unprecedented responsibility for a callously politicised Australian internet.
  • Array That sinking Tcard feeling
    There's something terribly unsettling about realising that the NSW Government is considering hiring a company to build a new electronic ticketing system which has already put it through the legal wringer for the system's predecessor.
  • Array The challenge of government 2.0
    The Government 2.0 Taskforce released its draft report last week, and its recommendations for Open Government almost reads like a manifesto. Stilgherrian's guest on Patch Monday this week is the chair of the Taskforce, Nicholas Gruen.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured