ASP SLAs: The bottom line

Paying the penalties

Of course, when a major problem occurs, the loss of data or business opportunity can't be compensated by any amount of money. However, a good SLA does outline exactly what sort of penalty should be paid in the event of an outage. This sanction should have enough teeth to make the ASP live up to its responsibility.

Penalties are often broken into minor and major categories, with a description of each being clearly articulated in the agreement. Often, a certain number of minor infractions will account for a major infraction. The agreement should also outline how many major infractions would be cause to allow you to withdraw from the contract without penalty.

Usually, penalties are designed to be a percentage of the monthly contract; the specific percentage is generally based upon the severity of the problem. Users should look for a proactive penalty approach in which the ASP uses sophisticated monitoring tools to spot any problems and voluntarily pays for any time that a metric is missed. A reactive policy, on the other hand, requires that the customer spot the problem and offer proof that remuneration is needed.

Advertisement

Talkback 0 comments

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Phil Dobbie A guide to the future of the internet
    Last week we looked at the history of the internet in Australia. It's been around for 20 years and changed our lives in so many ways. Imagine what it could do given another 20 years.
  • Array Carelessness busts Linux security
    No operating system can ever properly protect a computer from trojans as long as users continue to do silly things. Just because Linux is immune to your standard drive-by viruses it does not mean that it can escape trojan horses.
  • Array Sun shining on Ajnaware
    Graham Dawson talks about the future of iPhone app development and augmented reality.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured