Universities targets in 2005: Music industry

The music recording industry has denied reports that it has already laid down plans to raid Australian Universities by the end of February in order to hunt for illegally shared music files.

According to Michael Speck, general manager of the record labels' Music Industry Piracy Investigations (MIPI) unit, it is not yet certain whether MIPI will deal with the situation by conducting raids or simply continue ongoing legal proceedings against the Universities of Tasmania, Melbourne and Sydney.

"We intend on prosecuting. At this point, the primary target are Australian Universities. Whether by way of raids or simply commencing the proceedings remains to be seen. We need to finalise the individual investigations make no mistake about it. Australian Universities on the public purse have become the principal source of music piracy beyond peer to peer operations," Speck said.

Speck said the three Universities had not complied with a court order which will allow the music industry's forensics expert to have access to the Universities' data to retrieve infringing sound recordings. He added that MIPI is preparing to take the Universities back to court.

Speck assured that they will not be prosecuting students directly and will focus mainly on the "big businesses."

"We're looking specifically at the University industry. They are information factories that generate intellectual property and commercialise it and fully understand the ramifications of infringing copyright. They have treated the music industry with complete contempt."

"We hope that Universities will finally do the right thing and deal with the issue internally. Students could well find that their online dealings become the subject matter of the music industry cases. We will not prosecute students, this is about big businesses."

Speck said they already have a number of Universities identified and that their main priority in 2005 will be dealing with music piracy in Universities across Australia.

He added that MIPI had an online surveillance project in place which makes it clear what infringing activity emanates from Universities.

"We have been asking Universities to treat our copyright no differently to how they treat their own. We can only assume they have no regard for anyone else's copyright. There is no point negotiating with this industry," Speck said.

He added that several Universities have "gone back to their old ways" and that the 38 Universities have banded together to "resist any attempt to deal with piracy or properly license the performance of music in Australia."

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Talkback 4 comments

  1. "We have been asking Universities to treat our copyright no differently to how they treat their own. We can only ****ume they have no regard for anyone else's copyright. There is no point negotiating with this industry," Speck said. Wh Anonymous -- 05/01/05

    "We have been asking Universities to treat our copyright no differently to how they treat their own. We can only ****ume they have no regard for anyone else's copyright. There is no point negotiating with this industry," Speck said.

    What arrogant nonsense, Mr. Speck.

    The three Universities in question have taken valid stances against your demands for what amounts to unfettered access to their systems and networks.

    Perhaps you'd like to try demanding that BHP, or Telstra, or Coles Myer grant you access to their systems to allow you to look for pirated music.

    Don't think that just because these companies may have policies in place against such things that it doesn't happen.

    Indeed, if you made such comments against these companies if they refused you access, you would probably be taken to court yourself for libel.

  2. I work for one of the targeted Universities. (Sydney). Sydney has a complex system of forwarding on charges related to Internet access. Every computer in this institution generates a bill for every thing they do online. What the University as a whole is c Anonymous -- 05/01/05

    I work for one of the targeted Universities. (Sydney). Sydney has a complex system of forwarding on charges related to Internet access. Every computer in this institution generates a bill for every thing they do online. What the University as a whole is charged is divided up and sent to the departments as internal bills.

    If I start running a Peer-to-Peer program and download a lot, there will be a very high bill sent to my department for that downloading, who will then probably want me to justify it.

    Even ignoring policies that say displinary action will be taken if you use University resources to break the law. (And this is simple theft, no 'new' laws needed), doing so will cause a direct financial hit to the user concerned when the Internet bill arrives.

  3. Of course they're not going to sue students. Students don't have money. Anonymous -- 06/01/05

    Of course they're not going to sue students. Students don't have money.

  4. All universities are thieves, and we should be allowed to prove it! Who are they kidding? Gestapo tactics? Guilty until proven innocent? Naaah. Just the spreading of fear, uncertainity and doubt. Anonymous -- 25/01/05

    All universities are thieves, and we should be allowed to prove it!

    Who are they kidding?

    Gestapo tactics? Guilty until proven innocent?

    Naaah. Just the spreading of fear, uncertainity and doubt.

Add your opinion


Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Alex Serpo Will the NSW Govt put Linux in schools?
    The NSW Government's release this week of an expressions of interest tender to give low-cost laptops to every senior public school student in NSW is a big step, but will these systems be Windows or Linux?
  • Array Naked Mac versus protected PC: What wins?
    What's easier to manage — 200 Mac OS X systems without antivirus or 200 Windows systems running a leading antivirus package?
  • Array Dear Telstra: pack up your toys, go home
    Rejecting Telstra's proposal, after all, is the only conclusion Conroy can reach: as someone whose entire philosophy is built around transparency and process, he simply cannot keep Telstra as part of the NBN bidding process anymore.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured