New copyright act to hit NZ ISPs

2009 will force New Zealand's ISPs to come to grips with an amended Copyright Act, which includes a provision forcing them to disconnect customers who have allegedly infringed copyright.

(Credit: Holding a dot com III
by Anna Maria Lopez Lopez, Royalty free)

The update was made to cover digital media in light of intellectual property treaties that New Zealand is a party to, and in order to obtain a free trade agreement with the United States. However, the wide provisions of Section 92A and 92C of the new Copyright Act are a cause of concern for ISPs.

Section 92A states that:

"An internet service provider must adopt and reasonably implement a policy that provides for termination, in appropriate circumstances, of the account with that internet service provider of a repeat infringer."


The amendments to the existing copyright act were brought in by then-Labor minister Judith Tizard, who lost her seat in the November 2008 elections. Even though S92A was removed at the Select Committee stage, Tizard re-introduced it into the bill by means of Standing Orders Papers.

Both major parties in Parliament, Labor and National, voted to pass Tizard's bill into law. These moves came despite the National Party's Chris Finlayson, who took over after Tizard as Minister of Arts, calling the bill "very poor legislation" and attacking its process through Parliament as a "shabby law reform exercise".

Thanks to industry protests, S92A of the new Act was suspended until 28 February 2009, to give ISPs time to negotiate a solution with rights holders. The new Communications Minister, Steven Joyce, has said he will not repeal the S92A portion, despite acknowledging the concerns of its implementation.

Ralph Chivers, chief executive of the Telecommunications Carriers' Forum (TCF) — an umbrella organisation for New Zealand telcos — is tasked with writing a Code of Practice around the new Act for ISPs to follow. He says S92A contains "very vague language" that is open to wide interpretations.

Chivers says the terms "repeat infringements" and "appropriate circumstances" are ill-defined, making the law controversial.

Furthermore, under the Act, any organisation that provides internet services is classed as an ISP. That means universities, libraries, businesses and government organisations, along with traditional ISPs.

Despite slamming the new law as "deeply flawed" and "undermining fundamental rights", Chivers and the TCF have issued a draft Code of Practice in regard to the law, which is open for public consultation until 6 March this year.

Some of the main points of the Code of Practice are:

  • Evidence against infringers has to hold up in court. Pre-approval regime to be introduced, whereby rights holders' evidence collection methodologies are assessed to ensure they hold up in court.

  • Non-pre-approved Copyright Holders are required to submit sworn evidence for each infringement notice.

  • Rights holders won't be told the identity of the alleged infringer.

Notices that pass evidence muster will be sent to customers accused of infringement, together with an Education Notice; one or more of these a month results in a Copyright Notification. Users who receive three Copyright Notifications within 18 months will receive a Final Warning notice. Any further notices after that results in a disconnection.

Furthermore, there will be no stand-down period between a customer disconnection and re-signing up for the same provider. Under the Code of Practice, the copyright holders have to pay a fee between NZ$50 to NZ$100 to file a complaint. The fee is to recover costs for ISPs in processing the complaints, Chivers has said.

The draft Code of Practice from the TCF seeks to assure users that they will not have their internet accounts disconnected without fair warning. A disputes procedure where users can argue against "education notices", which disconnect users, is also built into the code.

Rights holders organisations APRA, RIANZ and NZFACT were contacted for comment, but didn't respond in time for publication.

Talkback

Copyright

I bet the supposed new Act is not legal.

I know in the Commonweath of Australia, an Act must not be voted on on party lines as its the null and void. The reason: The Commonwealth Constitution does not recognise political parties. Im sure there is a similar provision under the New Zealand Constitution. I would love to see this Act stand up in court. I would be challenging the validity of it.

It will never work, and good luck. ISP's cannot be held responsible for what people download. ISP's only provide the connection, thats it.

Typical Communist dictatorship.

FredFred February 6th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

:D

Should be interesting, watch all the lawsuits come rolling in form people who didnt download what they "allegedly" did.

AnonymousAnonymous February 6th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

1000's of innocent people

Let's now sit back and watch as people start using anothers unsecured wireless to infringe copyright. Which will then have the innocent party disconnected.

There will be lawsuits left, right and centre.

To see how the US extorts other countries - Watch the movie Zeitgeist:Addendum. You can stream it from google.

AnonymousAnonymous February 6th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Go NZ

Being a kiwi in Australia i have to applaud this and if it stamps out some of the illegal stealing p2p brings its a good thing. No matter what media is lifted and regardless of what corporate monster owns the rights the bottom line is, it's theft and anyone that uses p2p to download or distribute things they don't own the rights too is culpable.

As for unsecured wireless connections being an alternative if your running an unsecured wifi then its your own fault because if im correct its not illegal to use an access point that's unprotected. It takes two seconds to set up wpa and you don't need to be a tech savvy genius. If your traffic gets sniffed and your password cracked then its another story but at least you have done something to protect your network.

AnonymousAnonymous February 6th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

unauthorised access

It IS illegal to access a wireless access point that you are not authorised to access, whether unsecured or otherwise.

Nonetheless, you are right, it takes no time at all to secure it.

AnonymousAnonymous February 6th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Hypocritical

Wow talk about hypocritical, in 1 sentence you say downloading movies is theft and in the next sentence you blame a user when someone steals someone elses wireless connection.

It is hardly fair to say 'you don't have to be a Tech Savvy Genius", I have several friends who openly admit they are totally bewildered when it comes to computers and the internet, they often don't even know enough to get onto the net, after they have gone and bought the appropriate Modem that came with absolutely no advise on internet security, I am usually the one they ring with an SOS.

AnonymousAnonymous February 7th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

bah

it is the users responsibility to secure there own PC. You don't park your car in bad neighborhood and leave the window rolled down do you? and when as stupidity ever been a valid defense?

you obviously missed the fact that i was assuming that warchalking or wardriving was indeed still legal but apparently i stand corrected and it is a crime but the fact remains it is still the end users responsibility regardless of technical know how to secure there own network and NO you don't need to be a tech savvy genius that's what the manual is there for and your ISP help desk and i find it really hard to believe buying an ISp recommended modem came with no instructions but with that said i dont condone anyone piggybacking anyone elses connection but we dont live in a perfect world do we? so we take steps.

MattMatt February 7th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Guilty until proven otherwise

"which includes a provision forcing them to disconnect customers who have ALLEGEDLY infringed copyright."

This is a restraint of trade. Where is the burden of proof on the informant? What gives an ISP the authority under Common Law to pay the role of a court? Obviously the new NZ laws are flawed in many ways.

It will be another quagmire just like lesser laws that exist in Australia where some customers will be wrongfully accused and ISPs will be under threat from record companies.

Mel SommersbergMel Sommersberg February 10th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

At least one party wants to can the new law

Peter Dunne, leader of the small United Future party, says the new act should be dumped:

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/connect/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501833&objectid=10556606

Juha SaarinenJuha Saarinen February 16th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Internet Blackout NZ

We're running an Internet Blackout campaign against these unjust laws at http://creativefreedom.org.nz/

Matthew HollowayMatthew Holloway February 17th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)
Add your opinion

In order to post a comment, you need to be registered. (Sign In or register below)

Post your comment

ZDNet Australia Live

A user from Brisbane measured 1289kbps @ Broadband Speedtest.

5 minutes ago, Click here to find out how fast your internet speed is.

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit http://zd.net/dyhmnc

Another "No steeeking Win-DOHS!" RT @ZDNet: Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 marketing pitch: 'I'm a phone too' http://zd.net/bFPibg

Windows Phone 7 devices by end of September?: His current collection includes a Nokia N85, Nokia E71, Nokia 5800, ... http://bit.ly/dlTURg

New post: Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit http://bit.ly/9yAlXu

RT @maryjofoley: Microsoft's Ballmer: Windows 7 slates are 'job number one': http://bit.ly/bYcmwA

There are a couple of points in the story where David's digs at Telstra are offmark: firstly, an inference that the current broadband...

9 minutes ago by gromit on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

Microsoft's Ballmer: Windows 7 slates are 'job number one' http://bit.ly/bBG7ve

Win-DOHS, we don't need no steeeenking Win-DOHS!! RT @ZDNet: Microsoft's Ballmer: Windows 7 slates are 'job number one' http://zd.net/atdhxQ

RT @HeathClancy: EPA: Yup, greenhouse gases still unhealthy http://bit.ly/aZkizM #greentech #green

Between the Lines Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit: Intel today won a key ruling in an a... http://bit.ly/bAcNFO

Between the Lines Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 marketing pitch: 'I'm a phone too': Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer gave... http://bit.ly/c2x1K9

Between the Lines Real cuts losses amid restructuring, still misses analyst estimates: Real Networks’ second-quart... http://bit.ly/ccO6ZX

Apple Magic Trackpad http://bit.ly/amZmxa

RT @TechZader: Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 marketing pitch: 'I'm a phone too' http://bit.ly/cxedPj

http://bit.ly/bn9qQH "When using open source makes you an enemy of the state" ahah, quelle bande de nazes :)

@Hamface oh thanks! @gewg did you want to talk about why you made the jump for ZDNet? :)

iPhone there and back again: How to backup your iPhone, set it up as a new device, and then restore it http://bit.ly/c0SSgE

RT @seesmic: Seesmic listed by @ZDNet - Top 25 Android apps: The best of the best http://ping.fm/goi9K

@Justin_Bartak Thanks for all the RTs! Taking a look at the guts inside Apple's new Magic Trackpad - http://bit.ly/a4OBFm #Minneapolis #Mac

RT @seesmic: Seesmic listed by @ZDNet - Top 25 Android apps: The best of the best http://ping.fm/goi9K

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit: Intel today won a key ruling in an antitr... http://bit.ly/9yAlXu #mobile #apps

Sigh. RT @TechZader: Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 marketing pitch: 'I'm a phone too' http://bit.ly/cxedPj

For the iPad that has everything http://bit.ly/9EJLFz

유용한 안드로이드 어플 추천 RT@ZDNet - Top 25 Android apps: The best of the best http://ping.fm/goi9K

RT @ZDNet Microsoft: We are focusing on eight core businesses http://zd.net/ajzANC

David, you've completely missed the point. This has nothing to do with consumer value. You mentioned that "Telstra is supposed...

26 minutes ago by M.N.M on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

not sure about marketing.. "I'm a phone too": by @maryjofoley: http://bit.ly/ayVAmg

Yup! They're pretty and look real nice but, as one who qualified in 1963 - on a Diesel Boat - and retired in 1982 - after 6 more die...

29 minutes ago by willyjon on Get wet with submarine tech photos

MasterChefs launch iPhone 4 in Sydney - http://dld.bz/prSR I really want 1, would you get 1? http://dld.bz/prSS

"Not greatly dissimilar to the public jubilation felt at the end of the second World War, Sydney-siders ..." http://bit.ly/cTvyuB #reallysad

Hilarious coverage of the iPhone 4 launch from the CNET guys. http://bit.ly/cTvyuB

What a sad way to live if the only joy in your life is to queue for a piece of defective technology sold by a vendor who accused his loya...

2 hours ago by fred9999 on iPhone 4 Australian launch: pictures

@Jetttje: outlook-alternatieven: http://www.zdnet.com.au/top-alternatives-to-microsoft-outlook-339295046.htm

RT @NASAWatch: NASA photos mooned in abandoned Maccas (LOIRP) http://bit.ly/arFI4Y

http://bit.ly/9y8rsU Multimedia Toolbar Icons - Free Software Downloads - ZDNet Australia

I am happy to know I was right about predicting Symantec's stock price and the furture trend. As I have pointed out a few times, I th...

7 hours ago by strelaoz on iPhone midnight launches across Australia

Just weirdly found out Michael Yell - Country and Regional Director for OEM, XSP and Services Business at Symantec Asia Pacific and Japan...

7 hours ago by strelaoz on iPhone midnight launches across Australia

As I have reported to Symantec Ethics about David Freer’s (VP, Symantec – Norton, APJ) misconducts (fraud, having dissented sex with ...

7 hours ago by strelaoz on iPhone midnight launches across Australia

David Freer (VP, Symantec Consumer Business Units - Norton, APJ) is a BIG LIAR! He lied to me for more than two and half years for my tru...

7 hours ago by strelaoz on iPhone midnight launches across Australia

My speed is 33 807 I'm with bigpond cable

9 hours ago by francoo on Broadband Speedtest

That is a beautiful boat,but, I'd still rather go to sea on a first flight 688 boat.Preferably the 689 if Clinton hadn't decommis...

10 hours ago by rogue689 on Get wet with submarine tech photos

For many other reasons, than just the net filter, the current has to go. Still, I wouldn't trust Abbot either. There are however chec...

11 hours ago by ian_from_oz on Conroy's filter masterstroke

RT: @zdnetaustralia: http://bit.ly/cJU6Mf We've added Virgin to our iPhone 4 pricing table comparison.. See which telco has the best deal.

The pick: five business iPad apps http://fb.me/DOid8NXt

Apple to look at iPhone 3G iOS 4 problems - Software - News http://bit.ly/cmaTAJ _ that's nice of them

Stop trying to dodge the filter issue, Conboy; it'll bite you in the **** whether you like it or not.

13 hours ago by Hyperion on Conroy pledges NBN map, same policies

@merejames http://bit.ly/9YJ6e7

Facebook va lansa un serviciu de răspunsuri la întrebările utilizatorilor http://bit.ly/aS4kLC

Survey proves #AUS e-health demand http://j.mp/ah9Iwf /via @ZDNetAustralia

A "profound cultural change" is required for a truly open government http://bit.ly/bTht86 /via @zdnetaustralia #gov2au

As one who has been as critical as any of the Sol era Telstra...as long as Telstra are leaving feasible room for profit margins for their...

15 hours ago by RS on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

David, while the popular opinion, at least in the eyes of Telstra opponents, is to use every devious argument to stifle the operations of...

15 hours ago by sydneyla on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

Question two: What is stopping.... "AUSTRALIANS could save up to $1.9 billion a year in travel costs, petrol and time if they spent h...

15 hours ago by Vasso Massonic on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

Survey proves e-health demand: NEHTA http://itrau.com/bt9f8w via @ZDNetAustralia

RT @zdnetaustralia: Survey by NEHTA proves there is a demand for e-health http://bit.ly/bXuT1K

RT @zdnetaustralia: Telstra cops $18.55 million fine for exchange capping http://bit.ly/9cL91V

RT @zdnetaustralia: Survey by NEHTA proves there is a demand for e-health http://bit.ly/bXuT1K #yam

A good read..RT @zdnetaustralia: Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog? http://bit.ly/cSgC31

RT @zdnetaustralia: eBay and the Trading Post online help the Australian Taxation Office catch tax cheats http://bit.ly/dBDXRz

RT @zdnetaustralia Tesltra tweaks its data plans for all smartphones (not just the iPhone 4) http://bit.ly/bxO0G2

RT @zdnetaustralia: Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog? http://bit.ly/cSgC31

Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog? http://bit.ly/cSgC31

@mibus http://www.zdnet.com.au/commbank-dives-into-580m-banking-it-revamp-339288467.htm

The tech keeping Plastiki afloat: photos: ZDNet Australia brings you the tech below deck on the epic Plastiki voyage. http://bit.ly/aTj1QU

http://bit.ly/cJU6Mf We've added virgin to our iPhone 4 pricing table comparison.. See which telco has the best deal.

This story has been liked 5 times in the last 24 hours!

1) Telstra BigPond37 plans 1%
2) Optus76 plans 2%
3) 39 plans 1%
4) Virgin Mobile7 plans 4%
5) Netspace36 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband

CBS - ZDNET Australia Partner Services