Labor releases national NBN maps: pics

At a press conference in Perth today, Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Communications Minister Stephen Conroy released maps detailing the fibre, wireless and satellite footprint of the National Broadband Network (NBN).

NSW NBN map

(Credit: NBN Co/Australian Labor Party)

Gillard reiterated in her statement that the NBN footprint had been extended to cover 93 per cent of the population.

NSW QLD map

(Credit: NBN Co/Australian Labor Party)

The maps see all major metro and regional population centres getting access to fibre to the home (FTTH) from the NBN, with others covered in the wireless and satellite footprint.

NBN NT Map

(Credit: NBN Co/Australian Labor Party)

Both the communications minister and the Prime Minister said in today's press conference that the NBN was being delivered on time, on budget and would pay for itself.

NBN SA Map

(Credit: NBN Co/Australian Labor Party)

In the press conference, Gillard highlighted that the NBN was an investment in Australia's future which would drive advances in the e-health sector.

NBN Tasmania map

(Credit: NBN Co/Australian Labor Party)

After a nine-month NBN roll-out, customers are going live on Tasmania's NBN. Tasmanian Premier David Bartlett and supposedly Communications Minister Stephen Conroy too have thrown their support behind an NBN opt-out system.

NBN WA map

(Credit: NBN Co/Australian Labor Party)

Gillard highlighted that Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has said that he would scrap the NBN project if elected. The coalition is yet to announce its overarching ICT strategy in the run-up to the election.

NBN Victoria map

(Credit: NBN Co/Australian Labor Party)

Victoria is the state that will see the most FTTH infrastructure rolled out, if the maps are accurate.

Talkback

Now Julia, if only you would promise not to filter the internet in your next term of government (how about we arrange a random sample of Australians to get consensus on the issue as apparently that is the new way to do nothing while doing something) and you might get the hundreds of thousands of votes in the IT industry back for the good work you are doing with the NBN. But until the filter is off the table we aren't voting for you! Replacing Mr Conroy would probably also win you a few hundred thousand votes as well...

hsvandrewhsvandrew July 31st, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+9) (0)

You realise if you don't vote for Labor you won't get an NBN at all?? Who cares about the filter?? Any monkey will be able to get around it. And as far as the consensus goes, you know as well as I do that it would come back in favour of the filter. The vast majority of mums and dads don't really understand the net, and will fall for the promise of a 'safe' internet.

realdeerealdee July 31st, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+4) (-2)

Why is the credit for these maps "NBN Co/Australian Labor Party"?? The NBN Co should be distancing itself from the ALP at this juncture. These maps were produced by the NBN Co with taxpayer money.... they are not ALP property and they should not be getting any credit for them. Mr Quigley would do better to remember that Conroy may be history very soon. If the election doesn't get rid of him, another portfolio that suits his style and lack of technology experience hopefully will. There should be some openings with experienced ministers such as Tanner and Faulkner leaving causing the inevitable re-shuffle.

PhillITPhillIT July 31st, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+4) (-3)

Remember a lot of this infrastructure is already in place and if you take that away these drawing will look way less impressive. Also 93% was announced some time ago, not at the whim of Gillard as some news services are trying to imply yesterday. Some slides I saw recently of a Conroy presentation gave the impression of 1200km of fibre already in place... but he failed to indicate that it was existing and nothing to do with being built by the NBN Co. Its unfortunate that Conroy and Co have brought dishonesty to the ICT industry and made it a political football.

PhillITPhillIT July 31st, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+3) (-2)

PhillIT, I believe your comments would have much more credence, if your loathsome attitude towards the Labor party wasn't so evident.

As such, your obvious bias is tainting and putting a question mark over everything you say.

Regardless of how pertinent your comments may or may not...be.

RSRS July 31st, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+6) (-3)

PhilIT, 1200km of fiber is nothing compared to whats on these maps. There looks to be closer to 50 000KM of backhaul alone on there, let alone the hundreds of thousands of km's of fiber to go to 93% of all australian's doors. If you took away the existing infrastructure from that map, you would be left with pretty much that map.

DamianITDamianIT July 31st, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+4) (0)

Optic fibres for telephones were trialled for 10 years by Telstra in Melbourne and Telstra decided not to go with the technology and opted for wireless instead. Basically because the fibre was subject to damage too easily and continuing installation in a rapidly growing city like Melbourne meant that the price was too high compared to wireless. Why does the Government think it must have a one size fits all approach and insists that we must use it at the expense of Telstra shareholders and existing customers who want the security of a reliable system that continues to work during a power outage? Our copper telephone systems are reliable and still being run-out and installed in most parts of the world. The common disturbing factor is as PhillIT says the Labor Party which has a political agenda here rather than a market need. The Agenda is to be spending our taxes as fast as it can and to hell with the waste and whether anyone wants it. In Tasmania only 20% of people wanted it even when it was free. I challenge anyone to dispute theses facts. Oh and by the way, what happens to people outside of these map areas?

Big billBig bill August 1st, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (-8)

@Big Bill. Ignoring your idiodic ramblings in the first part of your comment, the 7% or so of the population who fall outside the red areas will get your beloved wireless or satellite. At the end of the day 100% of australians will be connected to at least 12mbps real world speeds.

DamianITDamianIT August 1st, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+6) (0)

Hear hear, most succinctly put DamainIT.

As for Big bill, we'll take his 20% of Tassie NBN free takers on board, but the latest Big bill? In just 3 months, the NBN has apparently already signed 50% of Tasmanians to the NBN. So...

RSRS August 1st, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

I thought 50% had only signed up to have it installed....... how many are actualy using it?

NickMelbNickMelb August 2nd, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

You realise if you don't vote for Labor you won't get an NBN at all - not looking good in the polls, you might get your wish to keep copper and s**t speeds lol

PeterITPeterIT August 1st, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+1) (-1)

PeterIT; You realise that if it wasn't for Censoroy we actually could vote for the Julia. Who wants an NBN (or any other semi-Internet service), no matter how good it is, when it won't give you open, ubiquitous Internet? Who wants an Government managed Internet when it also delivers Government controlled proxy filtration; censorhip, automated tracking, centralised cross-referencing, spooks doing analsyis, etc. PLUS logging of every Citizen's communications?

PlutoniumPlutonium August 1st, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+4) (0)

I'm voting against Labour unlike at the last election and i'm quite happy to loose the NBN if it means getting rid of Conroy. His shear arrogance and the internet liberties and perfomance blocker he calls a filter is more than enough. There is little to be gained by the NBN for most anyway. I'm happy on 20mbits. You can dress dicatorial politics any way you want but at the end of the day the results are always the same.

peternisspeterniss August 2nd, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+3) (0)

DamianIT - Why is detailing a benefits of our existing copper network being 'idiodic'? (is that some sort of modern diode?)
I'll retain my copper connection for a while yet thanks - at least while there's a well maintained central battery system at the other end designed to power my humble fixed telephone for some hours.
While high speed internet is great fun for the domestic consumer - is it an essential service? Maybe other infrastructure or community and health services rank higher on a needs basis?
Is anybody brave enough to predict the final demise of copper cable in urban Australia?
Is NBN just the squeakiest wheel getting all the oil?

HarHarHarHar August 2nd, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Government controlled internet blocking and filtering, censorship. Government laws to prevent association in certain groups (a la the bikers, by state labor governments in SA, Qld and NSW). Strange. I feel I am starting to live in some bizarre state controlled Orwellian world some where between Animal Farm and 1984. And this is Australia? More strange, all states and the Federal government implementing these laws are all labor based. Yep, I would really like an NBN, but at what cost to increased control by the state under the guise of the "nanny" state and the subsequent loss of freedoms. Yes, this should be 2010 and "moving forward", but reality is it's a move back to Europe of about 1938. Sorry, I prefer freedom over a state controlled NBN. Definitely NOT getting my vote.

scouterscouter August 2nd, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+2) (0)

The question of why do we have to have one shoe to fit all is an interesting point.

Why do we need faster internet? I am assuming it is for video and games? Email, browsing, Social networking, distance education, Skype with video calls, Video conferencing and Youtube all work on the existing networks.

Business' who deem they need more bandwidth for commercial reasons have a range of solutions to choose from on a cost benefit basis. Parents don't want their kids doing home schooling over the internet because they want to or have to work and school is the free baby sitting service.

Austar and Foxtel provide a 1000 channel capacity digital transmission service that covers the whole of Australia. A business or goverment body could buy some capacity to get a lesson or training material beamed out. Existing satellite technology will allow you to handle video and transfer files.

We ran a temporary office with five computers on a 3G wireless router for four months with little apparent slow down.

Other than emotional argument from the pro camp saying we have to have it because we are behind the rest of the world and con camp saying it will cost too much I have seen little detail on the facts. I have to pay tax. It will cost more than $43 Bil, Government projects always do. Why are the trial users being subsidised. Would they sign up if it was not subsidised. Is it an accurate way to collect data on take up of the NBN? Why won't the NBN release the modelling that they are basing the costings on?

PatonPaton August 2nd, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Senator Censoroy is part of a long line of ministers of all political persuasion who, being technically incompetent, receives advice from his less than smart department. I suggest putting a table PC near the water cooler so the Senator can read this blog while receiving advice. I find my 8MB copper service quite cheap and very reliable .

nevillejamesnevillejames August 2nd, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (-2)

I will not be voting for Labor they have lost me due to the filter and the retention of data policy's, I do not care about the NBN I am in country NSW and will not be covered by the thing anyway, none of the partys give a rats **** about us country bumpkins so it is the greens and nationals for me.

jrhvjrhv August 2nd, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+3) (-1)

Australians should be more mature, not to think censorship is limiting their freedom rather seeing it as protecting their childeren, You should be weary not becasue of this matter but because Interent service in Australia is one of the worst among the world including co-called second and third world. I start to lose my confidence in the australians. I thought they were bigger than worrying about trivial things in the edges while the disaster occurs in the core.
My regards

soulsoul August 2nd, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+1) (-3)

I live in the country and it is just as I thought....I will die before we get 100mps stuff, but we get the way slower satellite connection forever. My package is 4gb per month for $65...that's right....4gb! But we will still contribute to the $5000 per household approx cost for lots of other people to enjoy the nbn if it eventuates :(

mardymardy August 2nd, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Soul, We have a free Internet that we pay for. it is the single most important thing to the future of our democratic world, to the well-being of people around the world and their ability to share knowledge, free of political adn commerical interference, for the first time in history. Freedom of speech via an uncensored, unsnooped connection. The moment that it is controlled, freedom, science, innovation, intellect... all will vapourise. Perhaps Christians just want to kill the Internet, as if they can try to kill a piece of Science, like it is some kind of threat.

However censoring the 'Net it is not like censoring TV, movies or games, it is just a medium. If they think they can classify the whole Internet, the future of our children should be in far finer hands. Eg. The Chinese have been at it longer than their people have had an Internet connection. Organised crime in China now has direct aaccess to an International network, can work above the law hide behind all sorts of Great and not so great walls.

Censoring the Internet is proven to be follie, time and time again. It meets with 100% opposition from people like the EFF and human rights Organisations.

People who do not understand what the Internet is really for (the Internet's purpose has never had **anything** to do with Porn or movies or video games, regardless of how many people use it for such things. It is for sharing knowledge, ideas and communication- the very things that can save our children's futures. If people chose to do weird things with the network, it is their decision- they will do such things anyway, as they always did. We can't stop them. Who are we to say we know better anyhow? It is an elitist argument run by people who cannot impose their ideas on others since religion lost out to consumerism and greed. The delivery of Internet is already a battered, absued football, and like usual the Australian people are not being givn a chance by the 'unrepresentative swill' and their 'interest-vested un-representatives'.

PlutoniumPlutonium August 2nd, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+6) (0)

I forgot to conclude:

The Internet I pay for I do not want turned into the a restricted sub-network that someone thinks we can have, or hasn't yet got around to classifying. One which is not monitored and controlled so that it is impossible to think and develop anything beyond the bounds of our present human condition.

This is how dictators that run controlled societies maintain control, it is not how democracies thrive and remain healthy. For those concerned about keeping your children safe from dark forces on the 'Net, there are plenty of products around that can give you as parents this control- far better control I might add, than any government can ever implement, or have an opportunity to mismanage. If this is your concern (and as a parnet it should be), I put it to you that your children's safety is **far too importannt** to trust to the government or beurocratic agency. It is something you want to buy, like you might now buy anti-virus, so you can be sure to use the best service for your need.

The $Thousands of dollars per head the filter is costing would buy a PC for every person, let alone every kid in school. I'd put it to you that if they used all that monety to just train and pay teachers properly, that we'd get a far better return!

PlutoniumPlutonium August 2nd, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+5) (0)
Add your opinion

In order to post a comment, you need to be registered. (Sign In or register below)

Post your comment

Terms of Service - As a ZDNet registrant, and by using this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understand our Privacy Policy.

ZDNet Australia Live

I think the CBA point here is fairly much moot now. There was some, limited, argument for it before the NBN began, but as many people hav...

33 minutes ago by seven_tech on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

NBN's Tassie upgrade to cost $1.3 million: NBN Co will spend $1.3 million on replacing outdated network technolo... http://t.co/LCq84LB0

Govt urges telcos to team up against NBN Co: The Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy... http://t.co/E6axgFc2

Refund for some Facebook investors http://t.co/stdpGowE

Finding PCI-compliant cloud providers #in http://t.co/atLHOabj via @zdnetaustralia

Refund for some Facebook investors http://t.co/tUUxRbJd

RT @zdnetaustralia: Is Windows Phone really the third challenger to Android and iOS? http://t.co/2V9xgN6d

Cloud inefficiency - Bad habits are hard to break | ZDNet http://t.co/j4pda3KC

30 servers to 7: BUPA redoes virtualisation http://t.co/EPL5pPpl via @zdnetaustralia

Refund for some Facebook investors http://t.co/TdKeV7y0

Research key to good apps: Westpac CIO http://t.co/tqHNyHs5

by http://t.co/vmlLt4bh: Refund for some Facebook investors: Morgan Stanley, the lead investment bank in Facebook... http://t.co/TZuND7bC

Refund for some Facebook investors: Morgan Stanley, the lead investment bank in Facebook's troubled initial publ... http://t.co/tmiz9zwu

Refund for some Facebook investors: Morgan Stanley, the lead investment bank in Facebook's troubled initial publ... http://t.co/g1t9N5Pb

IT Priorities: servers and storage http://t.co/E1U97jCk

RT @rladvisory: Video - Rob Livingstone @EVOLVECloud 'Getting cloud adoption right' - @zdnetaustralia http://t.co/G6GwvJCp http://t.co/nJrIY3vA @rladvisory

What's happening now with storage and servers? We delved into the area in our IT Priorities webinar series. http://t.co/XmLAsln8 ^ST

RT @rladvisory: ZDNet Video of my recent Executive Keynote presentation delivered at the EVOLVE.Cloud conference entitled...: http://t.co/2h9hEno2

IT Priorities: servers and storage: In November 2011, ZDNet Australia published the results of its IT Priorities... http://t.co/uOxpN90t

IT Priorities: servers and storage http://t.co/iQ6oT7qe

Accelerator targets 'clean-tech' start-ups http://t.co/8kGTxJGp via @zdnetaustralia

Westpac board goes paperless with iPads http://t.co/kdm26Ewr via @zdnetaustralia

Cloud TVRs stop in wake of TV Now ruling http://t.co/2hLRUvt6 via @zdnetaustralia

RT @WauloK: Two cloud-based TV recording services have been suspended after Optus TV Now. http://t.co/VomMRrRs // @techwebcast Beem is dead.

ZDNet Patch Monday ep137 - Removing the anonymity from Anonymous: http://t.co/E6Tn8vJr

ZDNet Patch Monday ep138 - Anonymous 'crippled': where to for hacktivism?: http://t.co/lbKew6Bo

ZDNet Patch Monday ep139 - War talk dominates AusCERT 2012: http://t.co/rUm22Zjm

ZDNet Patch Monday ep135 - iiNet wards off AFACT, but what next?: http://t.co/0xVdYm6i

ZDNet Patch Monday ep136 - Blackhole crimeware as a service here to stay: http://t.co/evnCUlsX

GoogleTV will revolutionize television once viewers understand it http://t.co/c4lEyb3a

Reading this article is like stepping back in time. If I was Paul Berryman I would hang my head in shame. How embarrassing!!! I can’t b...

3 hours ago by MikeSkoey on 30 servers to 7: BUPA redoes virtualisation

Phone cloning, maybe, but bill duplication? Tech-heads give verdict
http://t.co/aw5SNigN
#ozpolitics

The registration sticker provided a visual reminder to the driver to renew regardless of what happened to the renewal letter. The experie...

3 hours ago by dccharron on NSW ditches rego stickers for tech

"xfire: Why is telecommunications being treated different to roads, water and electricity?" Good question, my guess is AUS is far behind...

3 hours ago by ngoctranminh on Five pros and cons of the NBN

“@zdnetaustralia: Is Windows Phone really the third challenger to Android and iOS? http://t.co/Tr7ASra0 ”. It's different but fast and good

Can HP bounce back? http://t.co/TSlWjmrA

Thanks for the response Luke, Given that the quotes are accurate, then the person in charge of the Vic Health App needs to find another j...

3 hours ago by butterflyeffecs on Android fragmentation steers Vic Health

Social business in Australia http://t.co/aBuXFy40 . Australian businesses still laging behind with social business. Time to catch up!

Can Windows Phone bring a new challenge? #WindowsPhone http://t.co/m82nU7hK

Nice analogy. Another factor is whether you can find 50 people with powerful enough weapons. Minassian's argument is essentially that the...

3 hours ago by Mukimu on National Botnet Network coming: Earthwave

RT @digitaltasmania: @ZDNetAustralia #NBN's Tassie upgrade to cost $1.3m http://t.co/1nTbLUJv -Countdown begins for 1st Oppn. MP to misconstrue per unit cost

It's nice to see Tas finally get some decent internet connectivity, for too long Tas has been stooged on decent internet connectivity but...

3 hours ago by Jingles on NBN's Tassie upgrade to cost $1.3 million

Who is Luke Hartsuyker? He must be the Apprentice FUDster. As PaulPC has already said regional consumers want, deserve and are entitled...

4 hours ago by dickster on Regional review highlights NBN, mobile

Its good to see the NBN keeping up with the latest equipement & letting the people benefit from it. After all thats why it was a trial, ...

4 hours ago by fibretech on NBN's Tassie upgrade to cost $1.3 million

Shadow Minister for Regional Communications Luke Hartsuyker has got it wrong. Regional consumers want improved mobile services AND the NB...

5 hours ago by PaulPC on Regional review highlights NBN, mobile

Just remember that Google haven't broken any laws here, they're just doing what all their other multinational competitiors do; minimise t...

5 hours ago by Pachanga on Much ado about Google's tax

ルイヴィトン バッグ : http://www.lovebagjp.com/ Louis Vuitton bags, Louis Vuitton pretension nose about,Louis Vuitton daydre...

6 hours ago by bundLourb on Reservoir blogs: Fan fakes Tarantino diary

シャネル バッグ : http://www.bagssalejp.org/ Chanel trap,chanel shekels,gucci bags,direct purse,poor recent Louis Vuitton keep...

8 hours ago by bybrinkLync on Reservoir blogs: Fan fakes Tarantino diary

I guess but in both cases, dead body!

18 hours ago by Doubt on National Botnet Network coming: Earthwave

I think it's for the very reasons you mention in your first paragraph that there is no CBA. With the ideological differences and vested ...

18 hours ago by RealismBias on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

Good points; but how do you establish consensus about the terms of reference of a cost-benefit analysis? What is to be included? How far ...

18 hours ago by Gwyntaglaw on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

I live in a small country town & have done since 2002. When I got to this town it had no mobile phone & no broadband. The only reason w...

19 hours ago by fibretech on Regional review highlights NBN, mobile

Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it is really informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I...

19 hours ago by Uttedsips on Fujitsu Stylistic ST5011

Like most things in life, the devil is in the details. If a cost benefit analysis included a societal element, I'm certain nobody on eit...

19 hours ago by RealismBias on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

The coalition has done nothing else but keep changing their view over the last 2 years. -first it was "there is nothing wrong with the ...

20 hours ago by djz on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

This story has been voted 12000 times in the last 24 hours!

1 day ago, Is Bill Gates a great leader?

This story has been voted 10 times in the last 24 hours!

2 days ago, CeBIT 2012 opens: photos

This story has been voted 15 times in the last 24 hours!

2 days ago, Lenovo ThinkPad 3G tablet (32GB)

Facebook Activity

Keep up with ZDNet Australia

ZDNet Events Calendar

ZDNet Events Calendar