Apple again pays Jobs US$1 salary

Apple Computer chief Steve Jobs once again took home a US$1 salary, although his net worth got a boost as the company's share price continued to soar.

Jobs has taken a US$1 salary for the past several years, although in March 2003, he was awarded 10 million restricted shares of Apple stock that will be fully vested this month. With those holdings, Jobs owns about 1.2 percent of Apple's outstanding shares, according to the company's annual proxy statement, which was filed Monday with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

As for other Apple executives' pay, Chief Operating Officer Tim Cook was paid US$602,434 in fiscal 2005, virtually unchanged from the prior year, although he also received a bonus of US$600,239. Cook received no bonus in fiscal 2004, but he did receive US$7.65 million in restricted stock that year.

Ron Johnson, the Apple executive in charge of Apple's retail effort, received US$552,795 in salary and US$550,202 in bonus. For 2004, he received US$484,836 in salary and US$1.5 million in bonus as well as US$6.38 million worth of restricted stock.

Jon Rubinstein, the iPod unit chief who is retiring this month, received US$552,795 in salary and US$551,239 in bonus for fiscal 2005, as compared with US$485,216 in salary the prior year. He received no bonus in fiscal 2004, but did take home US$6.38 million worth of restricted stock.

Apple's board had suggested that the company issue more cash bonuses. In last year's proxy statement, Apple's board said that despite the prior year's restricted stock grants, executives at the company were underpaid and urged the company to begin a cash bonus program.

An Apple shareholder, meanwhile, has put a proposal up for a vote urging the company to take a stronger stand on taking back products at the end of the products' lives. The measure, put forward by the Education Foundation of America, will be up for discussion and a vote at Apple's annual shareholder meeting, to be held April 27 at Apple headquarters in Cupertino, California.

The shareholder proposal argues that "Dell and Hewlett-Packard have both announced public computer take-back goals so stakeholders can measure progress against those goals" while "Apple has not."

Apple, meanwhile, urges shareholders to vote against the proposal, noting that the company "has a strong environmental policy that goes well beyond the shareholder proposal's very narrow view of environmental stewardship."

Shareholders this year are also being asked to approve Apple's outside auditor, KPMG, as well as its slate of seven existing directors.

After being targeted by protestors, Jobs defended Apple's environmental record at last year's shareholder meeting.

Advertisement

Talkback 0 comments

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • Array Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • Array IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured