Microsoft gets on the grid

Looking to blunt the success of Linux in high-performance computing, Microsoft is ramping up its commitment to make Windows a better fit for data-intensive computing grids.

Microsoft is creating a "Cluster Compute" version of Windows and intends to work more closely with grid industry standards bodies, Tony Hey, the company's corporate vice president of technical computing, said in an interview with ZDNet Australia sister site CNET News.com on Tuesday.

Grid computing is a vague term that describes ways to make several machines work together to efficiently tackle computing jobs. The reason to use grids is to get more bang for the buck -- by letting multiple applications share formerly separate resources or by automatically juggling priorities.

Microsoft is now wanting to engage with the scientific community in open, interoperable standards. We want to see if we can do technical computing on Windows.

Tony Hey, Corporate VP of Technical Computing, Microsoft

Microsoft's competitors, such as IBM, Sun Microsystems and Oracle, have each spelled out their plans for grid computing which, in general, rely heavily on the use of Linux on low-cost servers. Grid computing is still largely the purview of scientists and researchers, but businesses are increasingly using grids to make better use of their hardware.

Yet despite the growing interest in grids, Microsoft has been largely quiet on the topic apart from internal research efforts. And perhaps not surprisingly, its vision differs somewhat from that of existing grid vendors.

Hey, who joined Microsoft in June after heading up the U.K.'s e-Science research initiative, said that Microsoft intends to focus its development efforts on so-called data grids, rather than compute grids, as many companies and standards bodies are doing.

Data, or information-centric, grids are designed to let people access information from disparate sources and then combine that data as part of a computing job.

For example, a hospital could view X-ray information from its own imaging system and simultaneously access relevant patient data from different locations. Or a financial services company could do data mining analysis on multiple databases without having to send large amounts of information across the network.

"Federating data -- that's the big payoff. Aggregating compute cycles to me is the easy piece," Hey said. "You won't want to move petabytes of data around. You can move (server) clusters to the data."

Microsoft is focusing on sharing information -- rather than computing power -- through grids because that reflects what the academic and research communities are wrangling with, Hey said. For example, researchers could cull data from sensors with satellite data when predicting weather.

He said many of the grid technologies used in academia can be applied to business applications. Hey spoke at the GridWorld conference in Boston on Tuesday.

The hiring of Hey and Microsoft's investments in high-performance computing versions of Windows are signs that the company is taking the grid software market seriously, said Songnian Zhou, chief executive and founder of grid software company Platform Computing.

"The reality is they don't want Linux to take over the world in high-performance computing," Zhou said. "Tony (Hey) is serious about being a good citizen in the grid community, where they haven't been an active participant."

But Illuminata analyst Jonathan Eunice was skeptical that Microsoft would embrace open standards to the degree that other vendors do.

"Tony's endorsement of open standards is quite interesting and I think significant, but I don't think it's a statement you can trust. It's open as far as open benefits Microsoft," Eunice said.

Eunice said a good first step to showing its commitment to standards would be creating a good implementation of the Globus Toolkit (standards-based software for building applications that can run a grid of several machines) on Windows, something the company has not committed to doing.

Advertisement

Talkback 3 comments

    MS v. standards Anonymous -- 06/10/05 (in reply to #120121716)

    > Microsoft is now wanting to engage with the scientific community in open, interoperable standards.

    Watch this one unfold. First, they join the official body/comittee/group that does this (e.g. like they did W3C). Then they proclaim that their stuff is fully complaint. Then they deploy and there are - well - discrepancies from the standard. Then they quote good reasons for not following the standards, bag the standards body for being too inflexible etc.

    You can guess the rest. Just look at IE and AD.

    Microsux Vs Standards Rex Alfie Lee -- 03/11/05 (in reply to #120121717)

    Yes, of course the standards are much too inflexible. We have to do this our way or there is no reason for doing it at all. Otherwise you could just use someone else's system. Someone else's workable system. Someone else's effective system. Someone else's efficient system. Someone else's system that we could suck dry like everything else we can do it to.

    Too little, too late Anonymous -- 06/10/05

    Look at the top 500 HPC setups, nary a windows baox amongst them and that is for a reason....

    Windows is a "toy" OS.

    For serious computing you don't use a commodity operating system, you leave that to the mums, dads and secretaries that need to type letters and save their spongcake recipes.

    For the rest of us, that leaves only one choice(s)... *nix.

    And yes, I'm sitting 20 feet from a 64 node cluster churning away on...well, mathematically intensive tasks.

    Keep Windows for the desktop, it doesn't belong in the machine room.

Add your opinion

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured