Google vs. Yahoo: Clash of cultures

analysis On the walls of Yahoo's modest Silicon Valley offices there are posters with sketches of oddball inventions that have landed patents, such as a portable bird cage. The point: If a bird cage can get a patent, Yahoo's employees can come up with something big if they put their minds to it.

The posters are promoting a program called the "Idea Factory" that is supposed to goose inventive thinking at the 10-year-old Internet-giant-turned-media-powerhouse. Through Idea Factory, staffers are urged to submit notions for improving everything from the company's products to its campus.

Five miles down the road at offices of archrival Google, inventive thinking is assumed. At Google, engineers are expected to spend one day a week on a project of personal interest. It's a mandate that's spawned new services such as Google News, which now attracts 7.1 million visitors per month, according to Nielsen NetRatings, and the social networking site Orkut, which has yet to be integrated into the search site.

Jerry Yang
Jerry Yang
Co-founder, Yahoo
As the two giants tussle for domination of online advertising dollars, it's increasingly clear that this tug-of-war is really a test of what kind of corporate culture an Internet company needs: Is it a by-the-numbers and increasingly Hollywood-savvy environment like Yahoo's? Or can an intellectual playground like Google continue to grow and thrive even as it approaches US$4 billion in annual revenue?

The answers to those questions could have a lasting impact on how Internet companies are formed in years to come. If Yahoo comes out on top, investors could insist on a chief executive like Yahoo's Terry Semel, a longtime Warner Bros. executive known for his media savvy and no-nonsense directives. If Google continues its rocket ride, they could look to an Eric Schmidt, a passionate technologist by training and education who is happy to let his engineers steal the limelight.

"Google is... all about individuals fulfilling or exceeding their potential, and employees are given significant license to foster this," said Geoffrey Moore, high-tech guru and author of the popular management tome "Crossing the Chasm." Yahoo used to be like that, Moore says. But under Semel, who took over Yahoo's corner office four years ago, it has morphed into a more mature company with tough management discipline, but perhaps lacking the creative giddiness it had in its early years.

David Filo
David Filo
Co-founder, Yahoo
The two companies share a common DNA but are taking divergent paths. Yahoo's co-founders David Filo and Jerry Yang were doctoral candidates in electrical engineering at Stanford University in 1994 when they started work on their first search engine. Two years later, Google's founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin also collaborated as Stanford doctoral candidates on a search engine called BackRub, a predecessor to Google. Page's dorm room was the company's first data centre, and the two entrepreneurs even called on their friend Filo for advice before starting Google in 1998.

"The biggest difference right now is Larry and Sergey still run Google, and Terry Semel has a much bigger say at Yahoo," while its co-founders aren't typically involved in day-to-day operations, said Danny Sullivan, editor of Search Engine Watch.com. "Google is still infused with the whole Larry and Sergey spirit, if you will."

It's not just the cultures that clash. The two companies' businesses also are on a collision course, competing for the same Web visitors and advertising dollars. In the last three years, Yahoo has reshaped one of its core businesses around Web search and related advertising, making itself second only to Google in search ad dollars, with technology that many believe is keeping pace with that of its younger rival.

Advertisement

Talkback 5 comments

    Does Yahoo even matter anymore? There offerings keep getting trumped by Google. For anyone who wants to see what Hollywood type management gets you, you don't have to look any farther than the film and music industry. Stagnant, dull, unable to Anonymous -- 22/06/05

    Does Yahoo even matter anymore? There offerings keep getting trumped by Google.

    For anyone who wants to see what Hollywood type management gets you, you don't have to look any farther than the film and music industry. Stagnant, dull, unable to do anything remotely creative.

    In other words, crap.

    Google has more Goatse! http://www.google.com/search?hl=es&q=large+heart+soap+vanda Click the first link. GGs hope you like it! :)Anonymous -- 22/06/05

    Google has more Goatse!

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=es&q=large+heart+soap+vanda

    Click the first link.

    GGs hope you like it! :)

    The two search engines are completely different in their audiences, intended or not. The tech savvy tend toward the minimilist interface of google while the technologically impaired tend towards yahoo. I personally can't stand yahoo due to the blatant aAnonymous -- 22/06/05

    The two search engines are completely different in their audiences, intended or not. The tech savvy tend toward the minimilist interface of google while the technologically impaired tend towards yahoo. I personally can't stand yahoo due to the blatant and rampant commercialism of the site. Sure they are both their to make money, but at least google doesnt deluge me with a million paid links to every kind of thing but what I am looking for... Yahoo's interface is too busy and panders to the lowest common denomonator. That and the fact that I am sick of those damn yodelling commercials.

    yahoo vs googleAnonymous -- 19/02/08 (in reply to #120118489)

    perhaps google is more subtle true but thats about to change with google ads video. i am bombarded by ugly looking ads by google everyday its horrible esp when people tie it into their to trick you into clicking on that link. i know this is 3 years late but if you had to re-evaluate this article for todays time. You would still see google on top but yahoo has definitely improved themselves. Google as a company is not innovated or evolutionary as suggested by this assuming bollocks but rather they are more of a company seems to do things a little better with tried things.

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

Blogs

  • David Braue Will Rudd's bush backhaul bonanza deliver?
    Rural areas will be welcoming the government's decision to put its money where its politicising is, funnelling $250m into a regional fibre upgrade to six rural centres. Remedying over a decade of near-neglect at the hands of telecoms privatisation, the investment could be the firmest step yet for Labor's NBN dream — but with inevitable political questions and a looming election, Rudd and Conroy need to deliver, and quickly, to preserve the NBN's credibility.
  • Array Doing for AV what VoIP did for telephony
    Sydney-based start-up Audinate is making traditional analog cabling obsolete in favour of TCP/IP-based networking technology. And it's doing a pretty good job so far, with its technology used by World Youth Day and the Sydney Opera House.
  • Array WiMax in Australia: Part two
    WiMax could be the standard that drives the next phase of mobile broadband, it provides an opportunity for players wanting to establish a pure IP network to carry voice and data effectively — but is this what operators want?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured