Aussie enterprises will embrace Win7

commentary When Windows Vista was released in late 2006, your writer spent quite a bit of time querying large Australian organisations on whether they would adopt Microsoft's flawed opus. The overwhelming answer, in short, was "no".

News editor Renai LeMay (Credit: Alexandra Savvides/ZDNet.com.au)

However, ZDNet.com.au has received a very different response over the past few weeks after asking the same question about the operating system that many people are starting to describe as "Vista done right".

There appears to be no doubt that Windows 7 will be significantly more popular in Australia than Vista was.

Despite the "in-testing" nature of the beta and release candidate versions of Windows 7 that have so far been released, there appears to be no doubt that Windows 7 will be significantly more popular in Australia than Vista was.

Already, large organisations such as Centrelink and Telstra have revealed long-range plans to adopt Windows 7, and others such as the Commonwealth and National banks are testing the operating system as a potential upgrade for their Windows XP installations.

This enthusiasm for Windows 7 is simply remarkable, given the extremely tepid response that its predecessor Vista received only several years earlier.

In one memorable occasion, Microsoft was unable to disclose to this reporter a single large organisation that was planning to deploy Vista, beyond a handful already known such as the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service and iiNet, and despite advance warning of an imminent feature article on the topic.

Windows 7's favourable reception can be put down to two factors; as several reviewers have noted, it builds on Vista's strengths while eliminating its weaknesses and expunges the last vestiges of the XP legacy from Microsoft's new line-up. Vista, in places, could feel like a new coat of paint, with old XP features left untouched in places.

Secondly, like versions of Linux and Mac OS X first released in 2001, XP is simply not equipped to handle the computing requirements of 2009. A fact demonstrated by its feeble memory and CPU management when running a dozen applications simultaneously, its archaic interface, its lack of included drivers, and lastly, but most importantly for large organisations, its lack of robust tools for massive, unattended roll-outs and software upgrades.

In fact, there is a whole small segment of the IT industry devoted to building software tools around this last XP weakness, which, as many IT managers have publicly noted, is concretely addressed in Windows 7 and even Vista.

The enthusiasm can also be witnessed through the developing conversation amongst Australia's early technology adopter community, many of whom are using Twitter and other social networking tools to express their satisfaction with the early builds of Windows 7.

This is the same community that Apple has done such a good job of winning over in the past couple of years; and has spent that time proudly encouraging each other to shell out a few extra pennies for pricey MacBook Pros.

This enthusiasm for Windows 7 is simply remarkable, given the extremely tepid response that its predecessor Vista received only several years earlier.

Now many of those machines are also running Windows 7.

The 180-degree turnaround Microsoft has achieved in its operating system's fortunes since Vista is stunning on its own; but there is no doubt that it brings grander implications for Australia's ICT industry.

When many large Australian organisations finally dump ageing Windows XP operating environments for Windows 7, they will simultaneously update much of their other infrastructure, bringing other software and hardware into line with their new underlying desktop platforms.

In short, the impending wave of enterprise Windows 7 roll-outs is a chance for large organisations to slipstream other changes into their environments, much as they did with similar platform changes such as the deployment of IP telephony and the onset of virtualisation.

I would expect to see many IT managers and CIOs make the argument to their businesses to bundle Office 2007/2010, SharePoint, SQL Server, Windows Server, Exchange 2007/2010 and more upgrades with Windows 7 roll-outs over the next several years. It's my understanding that Microsoft's enterprise licensing schemes encourages this behaviour.

Such bundling activities will in the long term serve Microsoft's interests strongly and make it incredibly hard for other software giants to break into Redmond's territory. A demonstration, once again, that no matter how diversified a company Microsoft becomes, its success ultimately rides on its premier and most adopted product: Windows.

What do you think about Windows 7? Just another bloated Microsoft beast, or a sucker punch to the chin for the company's rivals and the dated XP?

Advertisement

Talkback 27 comments

    The market is already owned by Microsoft's illegal monopoly Anonymous -- 06/05/09

    You forget that due to illegal practices:

    http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f3800/msjudgex.htm

    http://www.ecis.eu/documents/Finalversion_Consumerchoicepaper.pdf

    Microsoft can already ram a new OS down users' throats, whether they want it or not - you can't buy a business PC without also getting whatever OS Microsoft is peddling at that time.

    Unless competition regulators (ACCC, you awake?) stop this automatic bundling of Windows, then this is a fait accompli; most Australian PC users will end up with Windows 7 within the next 5 years.

    Win 7 Anonymous -- 06/05/09

    It's hardly news that people are "testing Windows 7".

    People were looking to "freshen up" their Windows XP installation when the money was freely flowing and Vista wasn't the answer.

    Windows 7 HAS to be the answer.

    The end of the XP lifecycle will give you no choice but to move to Windows 7.... you won't be able to jump another OS !!!

    That's right, support is the only thing that will drive the adoption. If I was a betting man I wouldn't bet on any major Windows 7 deployments this side of Dec 2010 (that gives them a few years for the transition). Particularly if IT budgets continue to shrink like we have seen in the past 6-9 months.

    Open Source is an option I hear you say..... pleeeease.

    Welcome to lock in my friend Clag Monster -- 06/05/09 (in reply to #320134917)

    "Open Source is an option I hear you say..... pleeeease."

    <laughter!>

    Serves you right for failing in your strategic planning, and locking yourself in to Microsoft, dude.

    If you had played your cards well, open source *would* be an option to you.

    Now you must suffer with whatever Microsoft deigns fit to sell to you. Welcome to vendor lock in.

    Linux Anonymous -- 07/05/09 (in reply to #320134932)

    I'm still looking for the itunes client for Linux.

    or am I the only one with an iPod!

    You're kidding Anonymous -- 07/05/09 (in reply to #320134932)

    "Strategic Planning = Linux as the desktop OS".

    May work in the sub 100 people organisation but a large corporate ???

    Maybe too much Red Bull for you !!!

    Strategic planning means... Cap'n Jack -- 08/05/09 (in reply to #320135090)

    Strategic planning means moving your large organisation to a position where *you*, and not Microsoft, controls your IT future.

    So yes, Strategic planning *can* mean Linux as the desktop OS.

    Mediocre Anonymous -- 07/05/09

    windows is here to stay for now for one reason only - because it is here to stay. Nothing more. I think we have all learned that Microsoft software is mediocre at best and regardless of perceived bundling advantages there is much advantage to choose best of breed products for the long term. Rarely do microsoft products compete in this space. I don't think we will see any shift at all.

    Win7 OK Anonymous -- 07/05/09

    Windows 7 seems pretty good to me. The UI is a bit on the plashy side for me, but device support is pretty good. My laptop had a built in webcam which XP supported, Vista didn't and now it works again with Windows 7. Then again, it always worked under Ubuntu...

    Win7OK Anonymous -- 07/05/09 (in reply to #320135034)

    *flashy

    I like it Anonymous -- 07/05/09

    Fast, stable and everything Vista should have been. My only concern is for all the people who bought Vista if there is no price difference (read cheaper) for Vista users. They put their money behind a poor operating system and if they are not compensated for that then MS has lost the plot.

    One question... Skullduggery -- 07/05/09 (in reply to #320135045)

    As you didn't buy Win7 as part of an OEM PC bundle, here's my question to you: would you pay $300-$400 for you copy of Win 7? This is what the non-OEM upgrade price from Vista will be, assuming you have a non OEM copy of Vista. Otherwise, you could be looking at $500-$600 per copy.

    Win7 may be 'everything Vista should have been', but as a consumer, how much are you happy to pay for your copy, once the free RC copy sunsets next year?

    Probably not Anonymous -- 07/05/09 (in reply to #320135046)

    I don't think I would pay that amount. I paid that for Vista Ultimate and would think an upgrade from Vista to 7 should be about $175 and from XP to 7 around that $300 mark you mentioned. If it is the same price to update for XP and Vista then I will be sadly disappointed. Would rather move to a Linux distro (which are getting to be very user friendly) than go through this again with MS.

    Would you pay $175 for Win7 upgrade then? Cauldron Ron -- 07/05/09 (in reply to #320135069)

    ****umung the price of the upgrade from Vista to Win7 was $175, would you pay that price?

    More than likely Anonymous -- 08/05/09 (in reply to #320135179)

    At the moment I am still testing Win 7 but on first inspection I would pay $175.00 for the upgrade.

    Interestging Dr. Mobius -- 08/05/09 (in reply to #320135246)

    I've got 4 desktop computers at home (one for each family member), 2 laptops and 1 netbook. None of these run Vista, so I'd need to upgrade to Vista first, then upgrade the systems to Win7.

    I'll guess that the cost of upgrading to Vista is $175 and the cost of upgrading from Vista to Win7 is also $175, making $350 per PC.

    Therefore, 7 * $350 = $2450

    That's a pretty penny for Win7 for a family, no?

    I think I might investigate Ubuntu 9.04 instead...

    UPGRADING Anonymous -- 26/06/09 (in reply to #320135255)

    Also have a good look at Mint 7. it is based on Ubuntu and has all the codecs to go with it.

    Enterprise Choice Anonymous -- 07/05/09

    If we had a choice in the enterprise, would we be choosing to use Windows? Nope. Does the industry look to Microsoft as an industry leader? Nope. Does excitement and new SOE go in the same sentence? Never, not for the business or IT. As the OS continues to lose relevance, my bet is on another non-event.

    OS Anonymous -- 08/05/09 (in reply to #320135054)

    I agree, the relevance of the OS is becoming less and less. At the end of the day it is just a vehicle to your applications.

    In a corprate space, the priority should be on the applications and the application delivery infrastructure (Read: App-V, XenApp, VM View, or whatever they call it now).
    This application delivery infrastructure should be operating system agnostic.

    Those investigating Windows 7 must have some time on their hands.

    7 is great Andrew Ockrim -- 07/05/09

    I have been testing windows 7 for my company to replace our XP SOE. I also run Vista Ultimate as a comparison.
    I have found that 7 is na massive step forward form XP and significantly improves vista. We run a hybrid windows and novel networking environment and 7 has excelled at everything we have trhow at it - even the first release candidate 7000 was a dream to work with once u get used to the new interface.

    We have also been testing a few linux distro's as comparison and comparing all the options for a fat SOE against a Virtual desktop.
    7 is the clear winner in terms of usability and ease of transition from XP for our mostly PC illiterate users. It craps on FreeBSD (sorry Mac OSx) All our apps including legacy work on 7, and the 64bit client flys.

    It plays games and handles memory better than vista and most of the other other Os's. and now that they have fixed the UAC nags (or simply turn them off) with a few tweaks Win7 is going to be the way forward for corporate and desktop users. I have even installed in on a friends older mac g5 and it works great.

    We may all think MS is the big, bad, nasty mega-corp who only want to take over the world and that may be true but lets face facts.
    They have the resources and manpower to create the next gen OS that will work with almost every piece of rubbish manufactured (hardware & software).
    It will do everyhting we need it to do for work and home. Yes the interface is a bit bloated and aimed at the newbie users, but they are gonna eat it up on bigger screens and touchscreens. Plus for non-tech ppl its quite intuitive

    Plus there will be a million geeks like me ready to help people with their minor win7 issues when they move over.
    Plus it kicks **** for hardcore gaming (UT3, COD and all the fast shooters really kick **** on 7)

    Love them or hate them MS has recovered from vista with win7 and its gonna be a huge push to this OS moving forward, so long as they dont price it too high.

    Interesting Juke Miester -- 07/05/09 (in reply to #320135075)

    Most of the reviews I've read show Win7 about on par with WinXP as far as overal user experience is concerned. Both of these are betten than Vista. Certainly /not/ the knockdown winner that you claim,

    If Microsoft gives Win7 away for free, then perhaps businesses may go through the pain of migrating to the new OS.

    Something tells me that Miccrosoft is not going to give the OS away for free, however.

    Yes, but can Win7 deliver a 70% reduction in TCO ? Anonymous -- 07/05/09 (in reply to #320135075)

    French National Police Dump Windows for Linux and save 70% off TCO

    By gradually migrating to a complete open source desktop and web applications, Gendarmerie Nationale, the French national police force with 105,000 employees, has saved millions of euros. The move cuts Microsoft out of the equation, helping the French national police force slash its IT costs by 70 percent.

    http://www.infopackets.com/news/business/microsoft/2009/20090506_french_national_police_dump_windows_for_linux.htm

    http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iU4Lq7tOR_WVOJLZ3IeRaIH03x6w

    The Frogs and Linux are made for each other Anonymous -- 07/05/09 (in reply to #320135091)

    Wasn't sure if I should "Reply to comment" or "Report offensive content"

    There's a hundred comments that could be made here. I would consider most of them funny but am pretty sure they would cause offence to someone so will "bite my tongue"

    ;-)

    I guess we're too dumb to jump off Windows then, huh? Justin Case -- 07/05/09 (in reply to #320135141)

    The French can stop giving Microsoft tens of millions of Euros, but we Aussies are too dumb to follow suit, huh?

    Ignorance Anonymous -- 09/05/09 (in reply to #320135141)

    Make your comments. They are likely to be as ignorant, ill considered and ill informed as your initial comment. If you want to be dumb enough to pay through the nose for software when there are other suitable alternatives that can be considered then more fool you.

    Also as a tax payer I would like to know that civil servants have considered ALL the options as the French police have done.

    Fairness Anonymous -- 11/05/09 (in reply to #320135570)

    It should be said that just because you are running a Windows desktop fleet doesn't mean that you haven't weighed up the options and made the best decision for your circumstance.

    Blindly implementing alternatives to Windows is just as dangerous as not considering all the elements of a sound desktop strategy.

    I agree Capn Courageous -- 12/05/09 (in reply to #320135832)

    However, ask yourself this:

    on the balance of probabilities, which of the following two do you think the more likely?

    a) IT managers **never** bother to seriously consider alternatives to Windows, ie, mapping out realistic migration plans, scoping, budgets, they simply roll-over and re-select Windows on each software refresh cycle.

    b) IT managers jump to an alternative to Windows without due diligence and due process?

    Yes, I thought you'd say the former.

    In reality few, if any, IT managers have the skill or impetus to consider alternatives to Windows, as few of their fellows are doing it.

    Once a few of them did, however, and achieved seriously positive results, then the pressure will be on the recalcitrant to wise up and do likewise.

    Ooooo Anonymous -- 14/05/09 (in reply to #320135091)

    This happened in 2005. Gee hasn't there been a HUGE rush to follow suit... not

Add your opinion

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured