|
|
To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu
-------------------------------------------------------------- This story was printed from ZDNet Australia. --------------------------------------------------------------
|
Microsoft's new search head on how Redmond will fight Google By Elinor Mills and Ina Fried , CNET News.com October 01, 2007 URL: http://www.zdnet.com.au/insight/software/soa/Microsoft-s-new-search-head-on-how-Redmond-will-fight-Google-/0,139023769,339282492,00.htm
When it comes to Web search, Microsoft is the undisputed underdog, a position it doesn't usually find itself in. ![]() The company has anywhere from an eight percent to 13 percent market share in the US, depending on who is collecting the traffic data, putting it behind Yahoo (20 percent to 23 percent share) and far behind Google (54 percent to 64 percent share). And Microsoft's share seems to be slipping, nearly four percentage points from a year ago, according to Hitwise. How does Microsoft propose to narrow the gap? Earlier this year, the company launched a program called Microsoft Search and Win that rewards people for using the Live Search site. The program bumped up Microsoft's market share this summer. But while compensating people to use your search engine may provide a temporary market share increase, it isn't a good long-term strategy to build market share. Microsoft is hoping that it can catch up to rivals in overall search and find a few key areas where it can go into more depth, by offering tailored searches. For now, it is eyeing celebrities and entertainment, product searches, local search and healthcare as fertile areas worth having specialised results. ZDNet Australia sister site CNET News.com talked to Satya Nadella, corporate vice president of search and advertising at Microsoft, about how the company plans to improve its market share and improve search for the long haul.
Q: How much of your search traffic is coming from search embedded within other Microsoft Internet properties versus people going directly to the main Live.com search page?
Some folks have said it's about one percent of your traffic that comes from people typing in the Live.com Web address?
So, you're not going to be trying to narrow the gap with Google and even Yahoo on just general Web search and trying to attract people to Live.com?
Microsoft has turned to paid programs, either direct-to-consumer promotions or promotions with businesses, in the last year to gain share, or really recoup lost share. Is that something you expect to increase, stay level, or decrease in the coming year?
What about paying businesses to use you?
Some of the new features launched this week are already offered by your rivals. Is catching up really much of a game changer at this point? In some sense, it's perhaps not the position we'd like to be in, but we are in a position where quite frankly we have nothing to lose. We want to be able to come out, take some risks, do some innovation, get to a place where we have parity on some of the table stakes, and differentiate. The 70 million users we have is a substantial number, and if we can get them to do more searches, we will have gains. There is a perspective that you guys have perhaps pushed search as much as you can on the base of users that you have -- it's integrated in every possible MSN thing. Is the gaining really to be had among the people that are already using MSN, or have you tapped them pretty well, and you actually need to gain more users? Nadella: Our data shows we have a higher share of users than our search share, and they use multiple search engines. So, it's not primarily a switching issue; it's an issue of a product and the experience being compelling enough to earn a higher share of their searches.
Then the other thing I would say is our own network in MSN -- I talk about 70 million users, whereas MSN has 500 million unique users a month. So, even within our own network, if our product and our experience improves, people will probably not type in Google.com. So, that's another opportunity as well. It seems like you might be able to have a conversation around the differentiation points, but you'd have a tough time winning over general search queries just by catching up. And when you think about shopping, entertainment, local and health searches, they will add up to a substantial portion of the general Web queries where we will have more differentiated experiences as well.
When we have a conversation a year from now, what types of results do you expect to be able to have shared? What are some markers that we can say a year from now, if you've done this, this and this, you've been successful?
What are your plans in terms of marketing?
So, it sounds like the primary audience or effort is basically the people that you reach already and not so much the people that aren't using Microsoft in some way or another today?
I just want to make sure I understand. The new features and improvements you showed us today, many of which seem to really just catch up to what others are already doing, are going to be enough in your opinion to get those Microsoft network users, who are using other search engines and not Microsoft, or who are using other search engines in addition to Microsoft, to stop using those other search engines?
I've asked this question before, but to make sure that I'm understanding the answer, is it the case that you think you'll gain significant share without being better at the core? The features you showed on the core side were all features that Google has today. Don't you have to be better at the core to win? The fact that we caught up with somebody who was sort of the leader in the industry and started a lot before us should give us hope that we can do even better. But do I say that that would be the only time we'll gain the first point of share? I don't believe so, because one, we've proved that we can even gain share. Let's sort of forget for a second that we lost share first. If I look at what we have done on the engagement side with the Live Club, and all these differentiated features we have, in addition to the core, I believe we can gain share. Will we be number one instantly because we just caught up? That's a very debatable point. But at the same time, do I believe that we can do better than our current share position, given that we have these 70 million users and these 5 million users and [are] giving them a better search experience than the alternative? I believe so. Elinor Mills and Ina Fried reported from San Francisco for CNET News.com.
Copyright © 2009 CBS Interactive, a CBS Company. All Rights Reserved. |