|
|
To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu
-------------------------------------------------------------- This story was printed from ZDNet Australia. --------------------------------------------------------------
|
For Opera, smaller really is better By Charles Cooper, CNET News.com October 13, 2006 URL: http://www.zdnet.com.au/insight/software/soa/For-Opera-smaller-really-is-better/0,139023769,339271644,00.htm
Håkon Wium Lie must feel a special kinship with the "Band of Brothers" soliloquy that Shakespeare reserves for Henry V.
With all of Microsoft's riches and power behind it, Internet Explorer has dominated the Web browser market since Netscape's defeat in the late 1990s. But as CTO of Opera Software, Wium Lie's job is to figure out how to incorporate the best technology possible in his company's software -- and in this, he's stolen a beat on Opera's much bigger rival. For much of the last year, Microsoft has banged the drum for the arrival of Internet Explorer 7. In the meantime, Wium Lie says Opera has been able to move faster than Microsoft on sundry browser issues such as tabbed browsing, speed, privacy and security. At last count, Opera had only about one percent of the Web browser market, so Microsoft's not exactly quaking in its boots. Still, Opera executives say the future will be increasingly dominated by browsers found in non-PC devices, especially on the proliferating number of handheld gadgets combining computing power with telephony. Wium Lie, who works out of the company's home base in Norway, recently visited San Francisco, where he caught up with ZDNet Australia sister site CNET News.com to discuss the state of browser technology.
Q: What is the latest target date for Opera 10?
In terms of downloads, where are you now with 9? You can start, for example, reading a CNET article on your laptop in the morning and then, as you run out and catch a bus or subway, you can continue reading that article on your phone; the data can follow you. We're not quite there yet, but that's another point that's going to be a focus in our development -- to try to synchronise data between the mobile world and the stationary world.
It's like you have a used car -- what are you going to do with it? Are you going to get rid of it and get a new one? Or are you going to give it a paint job? I think (what) Microsoft has done here is given (IE) a paint job.
As you think about Opera going mobile, there's always the size issue regarding PDAs. How do you get around that?
We have the site, Myopera.com, where our users can publish their photos and do a bit of blogging, etc., and we can see that as being a storage point for all your settings, so that is going to then follow you.
Why do you think Opera offers a better solution than Internet Explorer on mobile devices? We're very focused on maintaining our code base so that it can go into all these wonderful new units that are coming out and as the Web moves to new applications, we want to make sure that these applications run on mobile units as well.
How many people does Opera now employ? Wium Lie: It's like you have a used car -- what are you going to do with it? Are you going to get rid of it and get a new one? Or are you going to give it a paint job? I think (what) Microsoft has done here is given it a paint job. It's the same formatting, and it's a Trident engine which, when introduced in IE 4 in 1997, was wonderful. It gave us many things that hadn't been seen on the Web before. And they have introduced things like XHTTP request, for example, so I don't think everything Microsoft does is bad. But I do think now would have been the right time for them to say, "We haven't maintained this browser for five or six years, and we should really give it a good update." But they haven't. The chrome around it has changed. They now have tab browsing. Well, Opera invented tab browsing probably 10 years ago, and now it's here with Microsoft. They've fixed some security issues. They've fixed some longstanding bugs, but only a subset of them. These bugs have been reported for years and years, and I think it's been huge cost to the Western world with all these Web designers having to deal with bugs in IE 6. They had to work long hours to make sure it renders in all versions of IE and also with the standards-centred browsers like Firefox and Safari and Opera. It would have cost Microsoft only a tiny amount of development resources in 2001 and 2002, but they let the problems linger. Opera's made no bones of the fact that you'd like to take market share from Microsoft. That's a pretty ambitious goal. Are you making any progress?Wium Lie: We've been able to retain a one percent share across the whole world. In some markets, it's much higher. For example, in Australia, it's five percent, and in Russia, it's 10 percent. So you know, if I can challenge America here, like in the space race in the '50s: Russia is ahead of you, and you need to catch up! (Laughing.) Of course, on the phones, we have a very different market situation. There, we are the market leader. We're shipping Opera in all sorts of phones; we're strong in the Japanese market. We've launched Opera Mini, which is a neat little application that enables the Web to be on almost every cell phone out there now. I think the mobile market might be what forces Microsoft down from their dominant position. I'm sure a lot of people will just accept IE 7 as it comes along, and they will force it on people by putting it as part of a security update.
Could it be that most people will say, "Well, it's included with the operating system, so let's just use it"?
Have you made any headway with the PC box makers?
What about your plans for rolling out more widgets? It seems that there are some gaps, with certain countries not represented.
Where are you, in terms of developing tools? Has the company has been talking about doing more in that sphere?
We want to do our part in helping. I don't think you're going to see a suite of authoring applications from us. I think there are enough other people who are doing AJAX toolkits. We don't have to do that. Conceptually, as you look at the way operating browsers have been developing, do you think the browser of 2011 will look pretty much the same as it does today?
Formats are going to be with us. There's so much content there, and there's really no reason to change them: HTML is here to stay; CSS, I hope; XML -- all these acronyms that we're dealing with are here. They're going to evolve, but they're basically going to remain part of the same functionality. The user interface -- that's the other part. I think the user interface is going to change a whole lot.
How so?
Does the line between the browser and media player disappear?
Copyright © 2009 CBS Interactive, a CBS Company. All Rights Reserved. |