Is the ACS irrelevant?

The Australian Computer Society (ACS) was founded in 1966 with the aim of furthering the study, science and application of information technology.

The convergence of various technologies and the changing psyche of an IT professional has forced the organisation to go beyond the IT realm and include telecommunications specialists, for instance.

Today, with a membership of over 16,000, the ACS claims to be the recognised association for Information and Communication Technology (ICT) professionals.

Sure, but in whose eyes?

In a recent IT Manager Australia survey, 80 percent of respondents said the ACS was irrelevant. Their main gripe: present demands from IT professionals are a far cry from their counterparts 37 years ago but the organisation just doesn't get it.

"I feel I have never received any benefit from the ACS. The only incentive it provided had nothing to do with IT, but were concessions on my home loan. This has since been cancelled," tech manager Brenton Cunning said in an e-mail interview.

"I chose not to renew my subscription a year ago after being a member for three years," Cunning said.

On the job front, most survey participants felt that being an ACS member was futile.

"The organisation has no consideration nor plays any importance in decisions when hiring contractors or [IT] staff," said IT Manager member Robert Milne.

A technology professional for 20 years, Milne said he's never had problems gaining employment despite his non-affiliation with the Society.

Indeed, when determining an IT job vacancy, a random poll revealed it wasn't crucial for a candidate to be an ACS member but membership offered some periphery benefits.

An IBM Australia spokesperson said the company's recruitment process valued "skills and work experience first and foremost".

"While we don't require applicants to be members of any particular industry or professional group, such membership obviously contributes to a person's professional credentials," the spokesperson said. IBM employs over 10,000 workers in Australia.

Jill Shapiro, human resource manager at technology services company Dimension Data, was more blunt. "Being a member of the ACS is not important when determining the 'right fit' for a position at our company," Shapiro said.

The remaining 20 percent of survey respondents felt the ACS still had some purpose to fulfil.

"The ACS is more relevant now than ever. In the past, it could be accused of being a toothless tiger content with sitting in the background but in recent times, it has managed to obtain professional recognition for the people who work in IT," wrote IT Manager reader Jeff Kemp.

"It has started making a stand and trying to bring common sense into discussions about the state of the IT industry. It highlights the impact government actions, or lack thereof, are having on the industry and is making solid attempts to assist its members in a time of economic downturn in the tech sector," Kemp said.

Another survey participant also pointed to the organisation's lobbying efforts but said its biggest downfall was advertising.

"The ACS needs to advertise its place as a professional organisation for the ICT industry and elevate its members as professionals in the industry," said John Ballment, who hopes to pursue the Certified Member of the ACS (CMACS) qualification in future.

Despite calls for the organisation to buck up or face a leadership change, Kemp stressed that although it isn't perfect, the ACS has improved and should be supported.

Advertisement

Talkback 7 comments

    The ACS provides an excellent ...Anonymous -- 25/07/03

    The ACS provides an excellent avenue for putting something back into the ICT industry. Even simply participating in events brings communities together and forms stronger bonds...

    If somebody isn't interested in helping grow the industry that they are working in - then they should get out of it.

    Do you mean "do we need t ...Anonymous -- 28/07/03

    Do you mean "do we need this type of professional association"?

    I'm positive we do! - to represent the whole breadth of "ICT professionals" at the national and state level, quite aside from direct personal benefits to members. Do 80% of ICT professonal really think we can do without a professional association's involvement in e.g. setting standards, accrediting courses, assessing the skills of potential immigrants? Are they really happy that governments will make the right decisions without a professional body of practitioners being available for consultation, and with the mandate to lobby on our behalf?

    OK, so the ACS has flaws - as mentioned, some expressed policies and views beyond their "review by" date, and not as many personal benefits as some similar organisations. Wouldn't higher participation mean more resources, hence fewer flaws?

    OF COURSE there are benefits in membership of the various international bodies with Australian chapters. But without a national-level body to represent OUR views in OUR context, where will we be in the future?

    Support the ACS - THEN change it!

    The ACS started out being very ...No Name -- 29/07/03

    The ACS started out being very elitist and made it difficult to gain membership. 20 years ago I was a consultant and part-time university lecturer in CS and a member of IEEE and ACM, but couldn't gain accreditation by the ACS. None of my clients were concerned by this. Since then I've had my achievements recognised and documented in Marquis Who's Who in the World.

    In this age of globalisation, I get better value from my ACM and IEEE membership than those few people whom I know to be ACS members.

    Well, they aren't interested i ...Anonymous -- 29/07/03

    Well, they aren't interested in membership. I tried to resurrect my membership that had lapsed while did a stint overseas, and they didn't want to know me. If they don't care, why should we?

    It responds far too late to be ...Anonymous -- 01/08/03

    It responds far too late to be of any value.

    While it does recognise issues in the industry, they respond far too late and have very weak solutions. The building industry has basic regulation in law, yet the IT industry has none.

    Regulation and people working in the industry need some form of legal standard to practice and the ACS should be able to lobby government to have this in place and this should have been done some time ago.

    The ACS is really a too weak of an organisation to be of any real value and has had plenty of opportunities to prove its value, but has missed every one of them.

    I have been a member of the AC ...Christian Simich -- 12/08/03

    I have been a member of the ACS for more then 20 years. It is useful in some respects providing a range of 'subsidised' conferences, courses and seminars. It also got very engaged a couple of times on privacy and other information technology issues but not sure how successfully. The magazines and other information material are possibly getting harder to be relevant due to
    the significantly diversified technology.

    One area I believe is significantly lacking now. The similar association in other professions (Accounting, Medical, Dental, Pharmaceutical and some Engineering branches etc) have a significant influence and say on the employment of the overseas staff employed on temporary visas. The rationale in IT is usually that they get ‘imported’ due to the lack of the local skills. On the other hand, how are the local professional going to get training and experience if that easy way out is readily available? While this had not been much of an issue for most of the last two decades, we are seeing very tough times in IT employment right now and possibly should not be shy in trying to influence the outcomes, to a reasonable degree. Such a role would be congruent as I said, with the other similar professional association in maintaining the professional standards and providing some certainty and 'fair go' to the members.
    In addition, stronger involvement in patenting, copy rights, Internet publishing ‘censorship’ (or otherwise) and privacy should be a major and significant contribution from the people who understand the technology implications of the political drift (though the politics and popular sentiment need to be taken into account).

    Christian

    Until Australian IT practioner ...Anonymous -- 01/04/05

    Until Australian IT practioners positively support and develop a professional ethos then we'll perpetually be the "IT-Guy/Girl" or contracting IT jobbers and can only look forward to diminishing pay, standards & status in a race to the bottom with 3rd world off-shore outsourcing. Why do you think that the dentist, engineer, doctor, accountants, physio etc. etc. domestic "skill shortages" are not resolved by 3rd world off-shore outsourcing? A well supported and proactive professional body is part of a of the reason these traditional "professions" have so effectively protected their members interests. Concomitantly these traditional "professional" bodies have rigourously maintained the skill base of their members with postgraduate education and CCR-like professional development.
    You know I'm right......

Add your opinion

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured