Deciding between honesty and the job

By Becky Roberts
18 February 2003 10:20 AM
Tags: honesty, techrepublic, hunt, job, strategy, management, politics, boss
An operations manager for a multinational corporation is required to lie to his employees to preserve his job. He has an outstanding reputation for honesty and integrity and has always been there for his employees--until now. What would you do?

The VP has found a position for you outside of operations, but at this point your boss and the VP will be out of work in two weeks. It is apparent that your boss is just learning of this situation from the lack of colour in his face. The senior executives are concerned that if the layoff is announced early, there will be widespread panic and that the company may lose key employees from operations or be exposed to sabotage.

The VP next indicates that this information is company confidential. If you tell anyone what you now know, you'll be terminated for cause. Likewise, the VP will be terminated for releasing the information to you. Your boss will probably be terminated as well. No severance, no transition assistance, no benefits, and no opportunity for finding another position within the company.

In effect, you are being asked to lie to your employees until the official announcement is made in two weeks. Both your boss and the VP ask what you will do, since your action may cost them dearly. Knowing your reputation and respecting you as an individual, they leave the next step up to you.

Your options

You can go up another level to one of the corporate executives. If you do, the VP will lose his job for divulging information to you that you were not authorised to have. You may be able to convince the executive that an open approach is preferable, but this has a low expectation of success.

You have an opportunity to begin your new position immediately. Your team will be told it was an emergency assignment to preserve a customer relationship. This has happened in the past, and so should eliminate any suspicion. The problem is that all members of your team have your home number and your policy has always been to be available if they needed to talk. You anticipate that at least some team members will either call you at home or look to find you on campus to discuss their concerns with job security. If you take the new position, you will be forced to lie to your employees.

You have two weeks' vacation available. If you take vacation, your team members will not call. This preserves the options for your boss and the VP, and eliminates the need to directly lie to your employees. What would you do?

Advertisement

Talkback 0 comments

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Chris Duckett Get extensions going in Firefox, redux
    Previously on Null Pointer we looked at getting extensions working in Firefox betas, and that was great until the fine folks at Firefox changed their minds.
  • Array How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • Array Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured