Is there method in Microsoft's security buys?

analysis While Microsoft's latest deals show it's committed to building its security muscle, some analysts say the company needs to focus on a clearer and more productive strategy.

Signed and sealed



Microsoft has bought up key companies and intellectual property rights with an eye to offering security add-ons for Windows systems and company networks.

FrontBridge Technologies
Company: Based in Marina del Rey, Calif. Privately held
Products: Hosted e-mail and messaging security and compliance services
Deal: Acquisition expected to close before the end of the third quarter pending routine regulatory review
Date: July 2005
Plans: Offer Exchange users a hosted service for security and compliance
Finjan Software
Company: Based in San Jose, Calif. Privately held
Products: Appliances for behaviour-based protection against unknown security threats
Deal: Minority investment, patent licensing
Date: July 2005
Plans: Microsoft has not said how it will use Finjan's ideas in products
Sybari Software
Company: Based in East Northport, N.Y. Privately held
Products: Software to filter viruses and spam on networks. Antivirus engine not included
Deal: Acquisition, now a subsidiary
Date: February 2005
Plans: Antivirus and antispam tool for e-mail and collaboration servers
Giant Company Software
Company: Based in New York. Privately owned
Products: Software to combat spyware, pop-ups and spam
Deal: Acquisition, now a subsidiary
Date: December 2004
Plans: Anti-spyware product for Windows (in beta for consumers), enterprise version also planned
GeCad
Company: Based in Bucharest, Romania. Privately held
Products: RAV antivirus engine
Deal: Sale of technology and intellectual property
Date: June 2003
Plans: Paid antivirus add-on for Windows; to integrate with Sybari software. Also used in Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool and OneCare consumer security product
The software maker said it was making security its top priority when it launched its Trustworthy Computing Initiative three years ago. Since then, it has overhauled its in-house development to bolster security and has put its US$38 billion war chest to work. It has been buying antivirus and anti-spyware companies and other security assets -- acquisitions that have been closely watched.

"While there is a great deal of hoopla around the acquisitions, what is more important is to see what they make of them," said Michael Cherry, a lead analyst at Directions on Microsoft in Kirkland, Wash. "I don't think that the past acquisitions have shown a tremendous payback yet."

It's about time that Microsoft turned the technologies it has picked up in its scattershot buys into actual products that customers can use, analysts said.

The company announced its takeover of FrontBridge Technologies, a hosted e-mail security provider, on Wednesday, the same day it said it had taken a minority stake in Finjan Software and licensed some of the security appliance maker's patents on behavior-based intrusion detection technologies.

These moves follow the acquisitions of Romanian antivirus software developer GeCad Software two years ago, desktop anti-spyware maker Giant Software in late 2004, and corporate security software vendor Sybari earlier this year. Sybari software can use multiple engines to scan e-mail and instant messages for viruses and spam.

The takeovers seem random, said Pete Lindstrom, a research director at Spire Security. "I think it is a reactive approach. They are picking up security products that they think are important to customers," he said. "It doesn't strike me that there is an obvious strategy to this."

Every product group is involved in Microsoft's company-wide commitment to providing users with a secure computing experience, Amy Roberts, a director in Microsoft's security business and technology unit, said in an e-mailed statement. "Microsoft's recent acquisitions in the area of security represent continued investments in innovation, customer guidance and industry partnerships," she said.

Microsoft first took on the safety of its own products with its Trustworthy Computing push. With the acquisitions, the software maker attempted to move itself into a position to become a player in the security market and offer additional products to protect both consumers and business users. The ultimate goal is to counteract the perception of Microsoft as provider of insecure software, Cherry suggested, "to make it such that customers have no doubt that they are purchasing a secure system when they choose Windows," he said.

It is evident from the purchasing campaign that security continues to be important to the Redmond, Wash., company, analysts said.

But the series of takeovers may also signal that Microsoft's own development efforts are falling short, suggested David Schatsky, a senior vice president at Jupiter Research.

"They have been focusing a lot on internal development as well as these acquisitions, which signify that they are probably not satisfied with the pace at which they have been able to build up their security capabilities," Schatsky said.

"Security is a top priority for Microsoft," Roberts said. "Innovation is constant at Microsoft."

Advertisement

Talkback 0 comments

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured