Hackers turn attention to Apple's OS

TechRepublic

Hackers are increasingly focusing on Apple's Mac OS X, and the number of newly discovered vulnerabilities has surged. Such a switch could mean big implications for Apple's user base, which has traditionally not had to concern itself too much over security.

It's been an impressively quiet year so far on the PC virus and worm front, and hackers seem to be focusing their attention elsewhere. One such area is Apple's Mac OS X. Once mostly ignored by malware developers, there appears to be a growing interest in this "alternative" OS.

Details
Have you noticed the dearth of serious PC virus and worm threats out there lately? Well, it isn't a figment of your imagination -- according to vnunet.com, viruses are no longer the top security threat.

While serious attacks are still likely to emerge, the bottom has apparently fallen out of the PC antivirus market -- just as Microsoft begins a big push into the security market. One cause of this drop-off is solidifying defenses, which have led vandals to focus more on IM and phishing attacks.

But another reason is the increase of hacker interest in Macintosh -- specifically, Apple's OS X, at least according to McAfee's AVERT Labs. Apple may have left 1984 behind, but it's facing a brave new world of threats.

McAfee reports that 76 Apple-directed viruses emerged between 1987 and the start of this year. That's certainly an excellent reason for Apple to run TV ads touting its superior security and a good reason for Apple users to be smug.

But that may all be about to change. The number of newly discovered Mac OS X vulnerabilities has surged by more than 220 percent (annualised) from 2003 to 2005. Compare that to an 80 percent increase in the number of Windows vulnerabilities.

Of course, McAfee is in the business of selling antivirus software, so it's important to take its reports with a grain of salt (as with any antivirus vendor). However, it should be obvious to anyone that OS X's growing popularity on Apple computers has helped boost the level of known vulnerabilities.

But just because an antivirus vendor reports the numbers doesn't mean they aren't true. For example, consider the company's March 2006 patch, which addressed an unprecedented 20 new vulnerabilities. According to McAfee, Apple's Mac OS X is just as vulnerable to attacks as the much more popular Windows platform.

One major concern is whether Apple is prepared to meet this increasing level of attention from malware developers. It took years for Microsoft to really come to grips with the mechanics of releasing warnings and patches in a halfway decent way, and the number of attack vectors caused a lot of the problem. Apple is facing a brave new world of its own, and it may not be ready for the volume of threats that are developing.

Another big concern is just how many Mac users install antivirus software and update it properly. While I certainly wouldn't blame most of them for ignoring the minor problems and avoiding the extra expense, this could easily add to the problem as attack vectors multiply and actual attacks increase exponentially.

To make an informed judgment on your own, I recommend reading this McAfee white paper PDF about the emerging OS X threat. An interesting chart on page four shows statistics on Apple vulnerabilities from Secunia, FrSIRT, and the National Vulnerability Database.

While the numbers are still small when compared to Windows, the trend is extremely worrying. For a summary of current Apple threats and patches, Secunia's Apple Macintosh OS X Vulnerability Report is easier to understand than any of the "official" Apple sites I know.

Recently, there's been a critical, unpatched remote denial of service and system access threat to Mac OS X. Secunia Advisory 19686 lists these CVE references for the unpatched vulnerabilities: CVE-2006-1983, CVE-2006-1985, CVE-2006-1982, CVE-2006-1984, CVE-2006-1986, CVE-2006-1987, and CVE-2006-1988. The same bulletin lists Tom Ferris as the source of the report and provides links to the original advisories.

Applicability
The vulnerability definitely affects Macintosh OS X 10.4.6 and probably other versions as well.

Risk level
Secunia has rated this threat as highly critical.

Fix
Apple has not yet released a patch. Until one is available, don't open compressed archives or images from untrusted sources, and avoid visiting untrusted Web sites.

Final word
For years, I've been reminding people that the product with the biggest market share always gets the most attention, and that's a major reason for Windows' propensity to be a target. I've also said that UNIX -- and Apple in particular -- was mostly safe because it was an obscure target.

However, this is no longer the case. It's time for security professionals to begin addressing the probable complacency among end users in graphics departments or elsewhere in the company, who have been largely ignoring security threats.

TechRepublic is the online community and information resource for all IT professionals, from support staff to executives. We offer in-depth technical articles written for IT professionals by IT professionals. In addition to articles on everything from Windows to e-mail to firewalls, we offer IT industry analysis, downloads, management tips, discussion forums, and e-newsletters.

©2006 TechRepublic, Inc.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Talkback 7 comments

  1. It's *very little* to do with market share you hack. Andrew Knott -- 10/05/06

    Not that old chestnut again.. Geeeze, when will you hacks stop using 'mainstream' IT media to push this meme... The poverty of viruses on OS X has very little with market share... In fact the ego driven psyche of a virus author makes OS X a BIGGER target because of the prestige of being the first... Do some research please...

  2. what a joke Anonymous -- 10/05/06

    McCormick claims that UNIX and OS X have been virus free because they're not popular. Now a real journalist would ask "Is it really because they're not popular? or could it be because they're more secure? I'll find out which is the truth and write a column"
    Apparently, that was too much work, and he just gives up: he suggests we read reports from antivirus companies and accept his assertion that OS X is soon to be a hackers delight. The sky is falling!

  3. A clear case of FUD Anonymous -- 10/05/06

    Yet another 'journalist' who tries to do this 'Fear Uncertainty Doubt' thing.

    After checking out the McAfee website, I realized that the don't even _have_ subcategory's for operating systems. Obviously, I wasn't able to find a single virus in their database for Mac OS X.

    If it were true that there are far less (maybe even none) viruses & worms for unix based OS because they are merely important, then why isn't this true for (for example) the apache webserver? 70% of all websites runs on it, and how long has it been since an exploit has been found?

    1. Small point... Anonymous -- 11/05/06

      Apache is an application not an OS. It runs on both 'nix and Windows.

      Linux is generally the OS for web servers, which is why web servers don't have more problems.

  4. Another attempt to blow smoke up people's a$ses Anonymous -- 10/05/06

    Yes, that's right, you should be afraid of these "viruses", they haven't been written yet but they are so sure they will be and because it's only a matter of time. "Hackers are clearly turning to OS X", and they are so desperate to say that, that anything remotely similar to a real virus will get street credit. Seriously, this is more poo written by people who really don't understand what a virus is.

  5. Visus company propoganda Walter Riggs -- 10/05/06

    Hey ZD! How does it feel to have McAffee's hand shoved in your butt so far that they can move your mouth?

    This article is based on the "opinions" of a "labratory" run by an anti-virus company? This is just another piece of obscenely, insultingly biased writing passing itself off as journalism. Who writes this stuff? Fox News? Lame. Innacurate. Crooked reporting. Shame on Ziff Davis.

  6. Apple's impending downfall Happy Long Time Mac User -- 11/05/06

    'Apple is dead! Apple is dead!'

    Or the latest variation on the theme.

    'Mac OS X security is hopelessly compromised, and will soon be as bad as Windows. Blah, blah, blah.'

    Bollocks. Again.

    OS X ain't perfect (no system or app ever is), but I think I will stick with it, coz the alternative consumer-level choice (Windows) is truly pathetic.

    Let me put it this way: I have seen quite a few people switch from Windows to OS X and be very happy with the results. But I have never seen anyone going the other way, and end up believing Windows is the better option. Windows has even lost its edge on the computer game market with the arrival of the new Intel based Macs.

Add your opinion


Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay StartupCamp Melbourne: The review
    StartupCamp Melbourne looks to have produced just as interesting ideas as the Sydney event which immediately preceded it, but the Victorian start-ups appear to have stumbled during execution. Sydney 1, Melbourne 0.
  • Array Google should come clean on datacentres
    It's nice that Google says it has put an effort into making its datacentres more energy efficient, but the search giant's pledges won't mean much until it discloses just how many of the beasties it's actually running.
  • Array US shows what OPEL could have been
    Sprint's WiMAX roll-out in Baltimore will prove the Australian government's decision to worm its way out of the Opel WiMAX contract was a short-sighted, and ultimately damaging, political stunt that has benefited nobody.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured