|
|
To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu
-------------------------------------------------------------- This story was printed from ZDNet Australia. --------------------------------------------------------------
|
Dealing with staff morale dilemmas By Peter Woolford, TechRepublic February 18, 2003 URL: http://www.zdnet.com.au/insight/soa/Dealing-with-staff-morale-dilemmas/0,139023731,120272117,00.htm
This column focuses on helping IT executives find the right answers for staffing and personnel issues. If you have a question you'd like columnist Peter Woolford to answer, e-mail it to us.
Question: Should I help a valuable player move on?
Answer: Blocking staff transfer has no upside
I once had a boss who tried to talk me out of a transfer because it wasn't convenient for him. He took me to lunch and let me drive his car. It was only a Toyota Celica, so I took the transfer. (If he'd had a Porsche, my career might have turned out differently.) Standing in the way of a transfer will mean your IT manager will soon lose patience with you and simply leave the company. You'll lose him as a friend and as a coworker. Helping the transfer means you'll have an ally in that other group, and you keep him as a friend. Helping the transfer also means you influence, and to some extent control, the timing of the change. If you block the transfer, you'll keep him for a month or two while he looks, but in the end, he'll be gone. And then you'll only get two weeks notice to replace him. A wise boss would agree to the transfer and then start stalling. Here is what you can do to stall successfully.
If you play your cards right, the transition will be relatively smooth, and you'll both get excellent benefits from the advancement.
Question: Should I keep dead weight since no replacement is possible?
Answer: Drop poor performers immediately
Everyone is working with reduced staffs at this point, and most of the weak performers are long gone. You mention this is starting to affect morale. You need to get these two out of there before your teams blow up. Morale is very important in times like these. While it may be tough to justify replacing two managers, it will be even harder to justify your own job if two entire teams leave. The big issue is what to do going forward after you cut the slackers. You mention you can't increase staff, but then you also say you can't replace staff. In most companies these are two different issues. While you won't be able to hire in advance of terminating the under-performers, you should be able to replace them. Your best move would be to negotiate the right to replace, without adding to headcount. This is typically not an easy dance. Here are some tips:
There must be something in air with the change of season: I am seeing a significant number of companies launching confidential searches to replace managers. I believe it is because of the business climate. Two years ago, all companies were doing well. You could easily push aside an under-performing manager. Now, you can't add to head count. You have to replace them. Good luck doing the justification dance. TechRepublic is the online community and information resource for all IT professionals, from support staff to executives. We offer in-depth technical articles written for IT professionals by IT professionals. In addition to articles on everything from Windows to e-mail to fire walls, we offer IT industry analysis, downloads, management tips, discussion forums, and e-newsletters.
Copyright © 2009 CBS Interactive, a CBS Company. All Rights Reserved. |