Big Brains

What's the best business smartphone?

At internet service provider iiNet, only executives and some senior managements have smartphones hooked up to the corporate network, according to the organisation's chief technology officer Greg Bader.

Bader says that the execs mostly have BlackBerrys, but that there are a few iPhones fostered by the managing director Michael Malone's fondness for Apple. "Most have BlackBerry because they've been using them for a number of years," Bader says. "We don't really worry about all the gimmicking."

Since smartphones are a productivity tool, people were likely to choose a device they were familiar with, he says. "At the moment it's iPhones and BlackBerrys."

Bader personally is an exception, having leant on the IT department to let him "trial" a HTC Touch. "I'm a geek so I like gadgets," he says. "The iPhone's too common."

Yet as Jetstar chief information officer Stephen Tame tells ZDNet.com.au, the more individual a company allows its employees to be in a device sense, the more patching is necessary for the IT department, and is the reason why firms will often choose to keep to their standard fleet, which is usually the BlackBerry. However, Tame refuses to consider BlackBerry because its proprietary back-end rules out having other devices connecting to the same hardware. It doesn't make sense to have two systems running, he believes.

Jetstar's smartphones are 80 per cent Nokia E71s and 20 per cent iPhones, according to Tame. His personal choice is the Nokia E71, which he calls "bulletproof" and is his personal device, not just his workhorse. Jetstar's CFO and the head of airports also use the Nokia, but the commercial directors and the CEO have opted for the iPhone, Tame says.

The organisation had previously been running the Windows Mobile-based iMate, but had encountered issues with reliability, Tame says. There are still some of the devices floating around, which have been passed on by executives to middle management, but there are no significant pockets of any other phone, he says, despite the fact that he has tried to keep device choice open as long as it is priced fairly and is easy to operate.

Which smartphone do you prefer?

Telecommunications carrier PacNet is the exception to the iPhone rule, according to CEO Bill Barney, who says that its corporate fleet is purely BlackBerry, although people do carry around other devices for personal use. The company has used HTC for three years, but recently switched, Barney says. Roaming is easier using the BlackBerry when compared to the HTC device, but the HTC devices have synchronisation problems and data transmission issues.

Barney confesses himself to be a fully converted BlackBerry fan since the switch from HTC. None of the executives mention the Omnia and none have seen any Androids appearing in the organisation as work phones, despite the original furore around the device.

This could change, with Vodafone and 3 about to release the next-generation Android phone from HTC, the Magic, adding to Optus' release of the first-generation HTC Dream.

Yet Gartner research director Robin Simpson doesn't think so. The analyst believes Android will suffer the same problems that Windows Mobile did. Windows Mobile, Gartner believes, relies on individual device manufacturers to make the package work and be attractive, which often they fail to do. Instead they achieve an effect that is "a little bit old-fashioned", to Simpson's mind. The Android devices Simpson has seen so far also haven't been particularly sexy, he says.

I'm a geek so I like gadgets. The iPhone's too common

iiNet CTO Greg Bader

Another problem is that manufacturers try to add features to make a phone based on a common operating system different, which makes it a nightmare for applications developers and enterprise IT teams who don't want to have to think about patching many different versions of the same thing. Novosel doesn't think Android will take off just yet, but for different reasons. Android is still on first generation devices, Novosel says. When the next generations come around, people will start to be more interested, he believes.

As for device manufacturers in general, Gartner's Simpson believes the smaller ones will really struggle over the next few years, while larger ones like Nokia have to make sure it is easy to do business tasks such as synchronise email and then style their devices like designers, not engineers.

Novosel points out Nokia's attempts to make it possible for a lot more of its phones to easily set up mail. This could aid the brand in the business market, but he believes it is too early to call. He also believes that there will definitely be room for other smartphone manufacturers to grow in the market.

Novosel believes that the BlackBerry will continue to do "extremely well" as the company is devoting a lot of attention to research and development. Gartner's Simpson agrees that it will carry on with its performance, saying that harder economic times will bring people to buy brands they trust, such as the BlackBerry.

It seems the corporate world's affair with the BlackBerry is not quite at an end.

What smartphone do you prefer? Take our poll or post your comments below this article. Click to the next page to see our reviews round-up of the smartphone market.

Advertisement

Talkback 8 comments

    tell 'em the price son!! Anonymous -- 27/05/09

    Interesting & helpful article, but the key thing you overlook is the ongoing price!
    With Telstra a Blackberry is $59/month locked in to one user for a 2yr contract!
    A Treo iPhone etc is $10/month (150MB plan) that can be cancelled anytime.
    The other thing is that overseas roaming is a bit better with a Blackberry. Sometimes Treos etc need to be manually selected onto a particular network.
    Keyboard thing is a preference, but I think emails are significantly slower without one.
    I am an IT Manager with about 30+ Blackberries, 80+ HTCs & Treos, a couple of iPhones in our fleet..

    It's a generational thing... Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu) -- 29/05/09

    Yes, Blackberry's may still rule at senior exec level presently, but in my daughter's (private) school Year 9 class, ALL the cool kids have an iPhone. My daughter complains that her 120GB iTouch is so last-year! She NEEDS an iPhone! I try to remind her that in Year 7, they all HAD to have a pink Motorola Razor!

    Everytime she tells me that she NEEDS an Apple laptop, I find her the right app to download on her Ubuntu PC at home... so as a supporter of Open Source, I'd love to see the new Google Android HTC get some significant market share. The Apple App Store is as much a vendor lock-in (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vendor_lock-in) as iTunes/iStore.

    But I suspect I will be losing the argument at home about an iPhone being an essential need for a 14yo. Teens listen to a lot more MP3s than execs... but when those Gen-Ys move into the workforce, they'll stay with a media-rich solution over something that syncs better to M$ Outlook (ie personal play over corporate fit).

    Apple's MP3 players have always been intentionally knobbled (no drag-n-drop of songs onto player etc - having to go via iTunes instead). iRiver and other MP3 players don't have those Apple restrictions... but you never hear any of the Apple-generation mentioning the problems. Their approach is that, as long as you fully-commit (immerse yourself) in entirely-proprietary Apple-only protocols, those problems go away. As long as you use ONLY iTunes to organise your music, the lack of drag-n-drop doesn't matter. As long as the only contacts database you use is the one on your Apple laptop/desktop, then it WILL sync perfectly with an iPhone.

    Apple is actually being remarkably successfully in converting its dominance in portable media players to the smart phone market. But with the entirely-proprietary approach, it will have the sort of (anti-competitive) 'control' over users that M$ used to have in business computing ('Stay purely within our lock-in technologies and we will always give you a migration path'... albeit to only further Apple-supplied products and services). It is plain scary to people like me who worry about national competition policy. But for the kids, if a device has 'cool factor' they're in. I suspect they'll need to fall off a cliff before they realise they're lemmings.

    And RIM has a lot of M$ lock-in as well Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu) -- 29/05/09 (in reply to #320139501)

    To be fair, I ought also point out that the Blackberry has a lot of Microsoft lock-in as well. If you're on a 'normal mobile phone' (eg Sony-Ericsson) and you send a 'contact' in your phone via SMS, the recipient can 'accept' the contact into their phone's contact database. But if you send a contact via SMS to someone with a Blackberry, they can see the SMS, but they can't auto-add that contact into their phone's contact database. RIM expect that contacts derive from syncing with M$ Outlook or some other corporate database, and are not things you get sent by other phone users.

    So in some ways, RIM is a lock-in for M$ computing software, in much the same way as an iPhone is a lock-in for Apple desktop software.

    The Android has the 'potential' to be neutral on these issues, providing 'open' connection with whatever other software, services, formats you use. However, it seems it will favour mobile email via Google, and Google Maps etc. As the 'third force' (what France called its military might), Google needs to offer users some measure of protection against lock-in by either M$ or Apple. And yes, implicit in that is the idea that Google are trying to encourage you to use their services, but arguably, there is far less 'lock-in' with Google mobile email, web-based maps etc than with M$ or Apple desktop OSs, apps and proprietary formats.

    not quite right bob -- 30/05/09 (in reply to #320139503)

    actually blackberry supports not only exchange, but lotus notes and novell groupware, which are entirely not anything to do with microsoft.

    Might as well just say that it supports a robust set of business network applications as thats more truthful.

    Point still stands, even with minor correction Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu) -- 09/06/09 (in reply to #320139869)

    Thanks for the additional information... I had forgotten that some corporates were still using Lotus Notes and Novell Groupware. Notes did introduce some novel functions when first released in the 1990s. But it was not designed as an email client. That was a tack-on function that came later. Last time I checked I remember being stunned to discover that Notes had more 'lock-in' than Microsoft, in that if you didn't continue paying annual licence fees, you seemed to lose all access to your older emails. Most archivists would shudder at such an approach. There may be some workarounds (other programs that will read the files etc) but I think later generations will laugh at the idea that anyone stored their emails into proprietary formats (including Outlook).

    Anyway, the point remains that organisations that deploy Notes or Groupware typically do so on an M$ platform (eg Mac users would be rare).

    And the 'proof' of this corporate-only focus is that you CANNOT receive a contact sent from an other phone via SMS directly into your Blackberry's contacts, whereas Nokia, Sony etc allow this. The Blackberry expects to be 'updated' only by PC linking (or you can re-key such contacts using the tiny keypad).... But to be more general, I should say 'corporate lock-in' rather than 'M$ lock-in'.

    cheers bob -- 11/06/09 (in reply to #320142275)

    thanks for replying so amiably to my anal contribution graeme. Corporate lock-in is a very fair term =)

    And Large Corp Deployments are a LAG indicator Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu) -- 01/06/09

    The article focused on a research company's noting of what results they'd found in surveys. But such data is always months behind the market (unless electronic data collection is used, such as with TV ratings).

    Secondly, the article focused on "large corporate deployments" yet this is a very serious 'lag' (not 'leading') indicator of trends. Individuals move with trends, rogue execs (those not prepared to keep with a corporate standard) are next, and well-planned corporate deployments come much later. The only thing they are ahead of is department-wide government upgrades!

    The third point I'd made is to observe who's advertising. At present in Australia no iPhone bundles are advertised on TV. Why? It's because the telcos are moving all they want to, without any promotion. Apple is reporting bumper sales of the iPhone, while telcos are subsidising/financing those sales. The iPhone competitive handsets are all being heavily advertised in the popular media. Why? Because they see that they need to address the run-away success of the iPhone, before they lose all market share in the smart phone segment.

    Fourth, the iPhone does not yet have broad channel support. Telstra, the largest telco offers what are essentially phone-only usage plans for the iPhone. That DOES greatly limit the appeal of the iPhone to the large number of Telstra mobile customers. Apple and Voda offer data packages... but they are not particularly competitive, as the telcos presumably do not want to be financing too many iPhone purchases. Finally, Three does not have access to the iPhone, and is not yet able to offer Voda packages to Three customers.

    Fifth, many know that you always gets bugs in the first version of anything. So a large number will only be pushed to purchase when their phone deals come up for reconsideration. If the v2 of the iPhone 3G is announced as soon as July (as some believe) then that may mark sufficient security for others to make the switch.

    I'm not saying the iPhone is the only answer in smart phones. But in the US, it is acknowledged as having the same 'big impact' as Apple's entry into the MP3 market. In 1979 the Apple ][ PC introduced an reasonable operating system and an 'open bus' allowing a whole industry to flourish with add-in cards etc, which were not possible/feasible with prior micro-computers. In 2008, with the iPhone+AppStore combo, Apple has managed to repeat this success. People who wanted to write specialist apps finally had a platform/opportunity to do so.

    iPhone 3G-S interest confirms 'cool' factor win Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu) -- 18/06/09 (in reply to #320140583)

    My earlier comment above about an impending v2 of the iPhone can now be updated now that the iPhone 3G-S is released.
    The number of apps available keeps growing. The telcos are offering tethering (use as laptop modem). Three will now offer Voda style iPhone bundle...
    Seems like the runaway success continues.
    In the same way that Apple's competitors in 1979 could not really understand why an open bus approach could win such market share, Nokia etc must still be scratching their heads thinking "What were we not giving the user?" But the issue is that any 'open' solution will end up addressing a whole bunch of niches that no corporate plan could ever address. Nokia thought it was heading off Apple by adding MP3 playing into Nokia phones, but Apple has taken full first-mover-advantage on the app-store initiative, and I can't see how Nokia's collection of apps, or Telstra's will ever match what is available from a large open marketplace. The best hope the others have is to get together all behind a truly 'open source' platform (Android?) and get developers to shift to an even-more-open arena, knowing that an app there will work on ANY phone longer-term. Nokia alone cannot defeat Apple, but only if all other phone manufacturers quickly get behind one 'more open' platform, they could re-level the playing field. I say this, but realise just how unlikely it is. Nokia etc would all like to own the apps market for their own phones, and replicate Apple's success. I think it will take them three years to realise that this was a flawed strategy. They need to all go 'open source' to now redress the clear lead taken by Apple.

Add your opinion

Back to top

Featured