NBN - Everything you need to know about the National Broadband Network

That other broadband revolution

By Tony Boyd, Business Spectator
31 August 2009 04:26 PM
Tags: aapt, dsl, iinet, internode, nbn, soul, voip, broadband

commentary While everyone was distracted by the NBN, a revolution was under way in the supply of fixed line broadband.

It involves the wide availability of great value DSL broadband plans with big download limits and high speed connections.

This revolution is a direct result of the industry settings forced into place by what many have claimed is a flawed and poorly functioning regulatory system.

The regulated price of access forced on Telstra by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is fuelling a profit bonanza for selected internet service providers.

How many industries can you think of where it is possible to get access to a service for $2.50 a month and then sell that service in a competitive market at $50 a month?

Gross profit margin for a broadband customer on the iiNet network is about 60 per cent

Those are the basic numbers that underpin the profitable business models for naked DSL broadband offered by iiNet, SP Telemedia (TPG and Soul), Internode, SingTel-Optus and Telecom New Zealand subsidiary AAPT.

Administrative and market costs have to be included in any calculation of profit margins. But the iiNet figures released this week show gross profit margin for a broadband customer on the iiNet network is about 60 per cent.

The Perth-based ISP is currently spending huge amounts on promoting its naked DSL connection technology called BoB. This is aimed at encouraging customers to dump their Telstra fixed line in favour of voice over internet protocol (VoIP).

Not only is iiNet heavily investing in promoting its naked DSL product, it is planning about $30 million in capital expenditure to bring more of its customers on to its network.

Internode is another ISP willing to invest in more DSLAMs in Telstra exchanges so it can put more customers on its own network. It is going to spend about $20 million in capex.

Other ISPs are enjoying the fruits of the fixed line broadband bonanza. The biggest winner is likely to be SP Telemedia which has a 31 July balance date and won't report until next month.

SP Telemedia is actually a beneficiary of what you might call a reverse cartel.

Telstra is sitting on 50 per cent market share and is happy to be priced out of the market by all its competitors. It relies on complacency, ignorance and inertia to charge more for its broadband plans than anyone else.

Why cut your prices if customers are happy to pay?

However, the result is that rivals sit just below the Telstra high watermark offering better value in terms of speed and download limits.

Telstra's competitors are reaping the financial benefits of the ACCC ruling in 2007 that Telstra can only charge $2.50 a month for a line sharing service.

Telstra originally fought this ruling very hard. But it has since raised the white flag and allowed the revolution to happen.

The more customers that an ISP can win before the NBN is switched on the better they will be when the access negotiations begin

The ACCC set an access price of $14.30 a month for unbundled local loop access, or Band 2, the most popular band, including metro and suburban areas. Wholesale line rental was set at $23.12 for residential access.

The prospect of the NBN arriving in five years time has got some ISPs thinking that they should maximise their current opportunity to increase customers.

The idea is that access to the NBN will not be a flat fee but have some entry price that will be shared pro-rata among the users. Analysts have rejected the idea that there will be volume discounts because this would give Telstra too much of an advantage.

The more customers that an ISP can win before the NBN is switched on the better they will be when the access negotiations begin.

With gross profit margins of 60 per cent, it will only take about two years to recover the cost of capital. That gives three years of fat profits before the NBN is a reality.

However, one tricky question to emerge from the revolution is this: why are Australians paying so much for "great value" broadband when it is delivering such fat profits from prices set by the regulator?

Business Spectator

This article by Business Spectator's Tony Boyd is reproduced on ZDNet.com.au courtesy of a reciprocal publishing agreement.

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

    Line Sharing Cabel -- 31/08/09

    If it costs $2.50 a month for ISP's to get access to Telstra's copper who pays to fix it if there are any problems with the line?

    LSS/SSS is not Naked Anonymous -- 01/09/09

    The $2.50 that 3rd party carriers pay Telstra for a SSS service is on top of what they're earning for providing the "voice" component of the line.
    For a ULL (unbundled local loop) which is required to provide a Naked service, the cost is significantly higher for the 3rd party carrier (around the $20 mark?). This is why you'll see Naked plans generally in excess of $15 on top of the equivalent non-naked plan.
    Telstra is NOT being ripped off as this article might suggest

    great value is a joke Anonymous -- 01/09/09

    How can you possibly say "great value DSL broadband plans" when australian customers pay an enormously unfair amount for DSL with rubiish data allowances and pathetically slow line speeds???

    Most major US cities a resident can get fiber to the home access at up to 20mbs guaranteed bandwidth with no D/L limits for around $60p/m

    If it wasnt for iinet, Internode and some other ISP's (not reselling telstra copper) we would still be in the dark ages.

    There is no great value in our braoadband when within 2km of Sydney CBD we can only get 2mbs on a 50gig plan for $95.

    Australian consumers just dont get how badly they are being ripped off

    Costs Susannah Bear -- 01/09/09

    I logged into my iiNet account toolbox and noticed I'd just clocked up my 12yrs as a client. In that time I have had dial up and then broadband and now naked broadband from my favourite ISP. I remember when broadband accounts cost ~ $120/month for bugger all downloads. Now I pay $89.95 for 100GB and my phone calls are free and I am free of Telstra's BS Line Rental and Telstra themselves. People pay so much to them because they are too afraid of change or too complacent If you make a lot of calls from your home phone CHANGE TO IINET. Local calls are FREE, National calls are FREE. Call your friends over east for as long as you like. Why are some of you still paying for calls? I do not understand. My internet works all the time, give it a go, at worse you can always go back.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Stilgherrian The challenge of government 2.0
    The Government 2.0 Taskforce released its draft report last week, and its recommendations for Open Government almost reads like a manifesto. Stilgherrian's guest on Patch Monday this week is the chair of the Taskforce, Nicholas Gruen.
  • Array The people's NBN, now with 1001 uses
    Faced with a renewed threat in newly-appointed Tony Abbott and unknown-quantity communications portfolio ankle-biter Tony Smith, Stephen Conroy responded this week in the way any politician would: he gave lots, and lots, and lots of speeches.
  • Array A guide to the future of the internet
    Last week we looked at the history of the internet in Australia. It's been around for 20 years and changed our lives in so many ways. Imagine what it could do given another 20 years.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured