Is Sol Trujillo about to leave Telstra?

commentary The departure of Telstra's chief operations officer later this month has sparked speculation that the last of the original three Americans who have presided over the transformation of the group, Sol Trujillo, will be the next to return home.

Telstra CEO Sol Trujillo
(Credit: Telstra)

Well, of course, he will — by definition, if he's the last, he'll be the next! More seriously, with the controversial but engaging Phil Burgess having left last year, and now Greg Winn announcing he will go on 31 January, it is clear that Trujillo's frenetic period at the helm of Telstra is drawing to a close and he is likely to be gone — of his own volition — before the end of the year.

When Trujillo was appointed Telstra's CEO in July 2005 he signed for a three-year term. Burgess and Winn soon joined him, originally planning to stay for relatively brief stints to help get the Trujillo revolution underway. Both were pulled out of semi-retirement by Trujillo and both stayed far longer than they anticipated.

Trujillo is now on an open-ended arrangement under which he could leave with very limited notice.

While he has been coy about his plans — he has generally said he wanted to stay until the five-year transformation program was largely complete — within Telstra it has been well understood that it was unlikely he would stick around until 2010. Within the market, with most of the big milestones for the program passed, there has been an expectation that this will be his final year.

It may have been different if Telstra hadn't been shut out of the National Broadband Network (NBN) tender, although that apparently wouldn't have coloured Winn's decision. It may also have been different if the global financial crisis and sharemarket meltdown hadn't wiped out the value of his scrip-based incentives.

Trujillo is known to covet one last major CEO role. The visibility of the re-making of Telstra within the global industry — Telstra is, at an operational and commercial level one of the best-performing telcos on the globe — and, in particular, the remarkable roll-out of its Next G wireless broadband network, means Trujillo has remained a high-profile figure in the international industry.

Telstra's chairman, Donald McGauchie, isn't scheduled to retire until 2011, which means that he will carry the ultimate responsibility for choosing Trujillo's successor. It was McGauchie who oversaw the search that brought Trujillo to the group.

There will inevitably be a global search in tandem with an evaluation of the internal and domestic candidates; indeed there are suggestions that the search is already underway and may well have been for some time.

Within Telstra it has been well understood that it was unlikely he would stick around until 2010

Last time, McGauchie wanted a change agent who would shake up Telstra and drive radical changes through the business and its relationships with its regulator and the Federal Government. He definitely got what he sought.

With the bulk of the transformation program behind it, and the looming challenges more external than internal, the big focus will be on how Telstra responds to a third party winning an NBN tender that would displace Telstra's copper-based dominance of fixed line telecommunications — the attributes the next CEO will need may be different to those Trujillo brought to the company.

McGauchie would be very aware, of course, that whatever the differences between the next CEO and Trujillo, the one big thing they will need to have in common is the stomach for a stoush — the value at stake if Telstra remains frozen out of the NBN process virtually ensures an ugly and protracted confrontation with government, regulators and competitors.

Contrary to early expectations, Trujillo didn't purge Telstra's senior management and so there are a number of now very experienced executives within the senior ranks. Foxtel's Kim Williams could also be a potential candidate. Or McGauchie and his board might like to repeat what they regard as a very successful and necessary exercise and appoint another outsider.

When Trujillo does go, despite the controversies, the impact of the financial crisis on Telstra's share price and the weight of the transformation program on the group's profitability, he and the other Americans who joined him (marketing whizz Bill Stewart is still in place) will have achieved most of what they set out to do.

Business Spectator

This article by Business Spectator's Stephen Bartholomeusz is reproduced on ZDNet.com.au courtesy of a reciprocal publishing agreement.

Advertisement

Talkback 55 comments

    Do it Sol. You know you want to Mel Sommersberg -- 28/01/09

    Please take our useless Prime Minister with you.

    Yep take Ruddy with you! Phil Grable -- 28/01/09 (in reply to #320121749)

    Yes please take Rudd....please I beg of you!

    @Yep take Ruddy with you! Anonymous -- 29/01/09 (in reply to #320121757)

    And Wayne Swan, Julia Gillard and all Rudd's union mates.

    Nice try ladies, NOT. Anonymous -- 29/01/09 (in reply to #320121829)

    Oh look, all the Nazi's are trying to bait the humans.

    Better luck next time and please stick to the topic in future or go elsewhere, rofl.

    @Nice try ladies, NOT. Anonymous -- 29/01/09 (in reply to #320121845)

    Oh look again, a comment not worth reading. What topic are you referring to, you goose.

    @@Nice try Anonymous -- 02/02/09 (in reply to #320121867)

    Blithering idiot, if you can read please do so.

    THE TOPIC, der. I'll spell it out for you imbecile - Sol Trujillo possibly leaving?

    Off topic - Take Rudd, Swan etc too.

    Do you understand or would a picture help?

    Did someone say nazis?! Nazi Dinosaur Lord! -- 02/02/09 (in reply to #320121845)

    RAWWWW thats the cue for the mighty dino-nazis (in cahoots with the green skinned women) to ride in and enslave humanity, Watch out!! rawwww!

    rofl saying their nazis is a bit overkill me thinks...

    Overkill normally, yes. Anonymous -- 02/02/09 (in reply to #320122063)

    Yes it would be overkill under normal circumstances, I agree. But if you knew the people saying the above (well one in particular, anyway) you may not then think it harsh, in fact very apt?

    Why? Anonymous -- 03/02/09 (in reply to #320121757)

    Stop believing everything you read in the Daily Telegraph.
    Start investigating for yourself.

    Blame the ones at fault! Anonymous -- 03/02/09 (in reply to #320121749)

    Typical.
    Our ELECTED PM is doing his best, given the state the world is in, thanks to you-know-who....
    Rampant profits at the expense of solid asset based investment.
    (Not to mention someone putting all our eggs in the overseas mineral-boom basket).

    PS How's your super doing? Did you follow Peter and John's advice?

    The one at fault == KRudd. Mel Sommersberg -- 03/02/09 (in reply to #320122158)

    Australia's problems are caused by us having a government with no vision and leadership. KRudd spends as much time out of the country as he does in it and unlike the previous government who busted a gut to fend off two world recessions, KRudd just uses the situation to stuff around and do nothing whilst telling us to accept what is going to happen. He is bloody useless. Under Labor when America sneezes Australia catches a cold. Under Liberal/National America could break an arm and both legs whilst Australia runs five marathons and goes for a 10km swim.

    Celebration time Anonymous -- 03/02/09 (in reply to #320122180)

    Hey Mel, I almost forgot.

    You guys would have been doing some pretty heavy duty celebrating over the weekend, aye? Drinking plenty of beer (but not Tooheys old of course, that would be way too 'black' for you).

    For those who don't know what you were celebrating, and since 'you keep wanting to bait us by going off topic and talking of Prime Ministers', both of your heroes ironically made it big on the same date, January 30, didn't they?

    January 30, 1933, Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany.

    January 30, 1995, John Howard became Liberal leader.

    Celebrating what Mel Sommersberg -- 03/02/09 (in reply to #320122187)

    You are the most brainless tw@t I have heard from in a long time Anonymous and I rarely resort to name-calling. However, on this occasion however I think it is prudent.

    Since when is comparing dates relevant, especially when you are comparing one person becoming the leader of their country to a person becoming only leader of a political party at one level of government?

    As far as I remember, John Howard became Prime Minister on the 11th March, 1996. if you are going to put these stupid and irrelevant statistics the least you could do is express the date in the correct way. It would give you about 1% credibility, which is certainly better than the 0% you currently enjoy.

    Mel, Mel Mel? Anonymous -- 03/02/09 (in reply to #320122199)

    Ooh I hit a nerve with the "Grand Wizard Mel" yet again, roflmfao. Take the white hood off, Lord Watchdog.

    You say, you rarely resort to name calling - LIAR. You have called me every name under the sun. But so what? I won't call in my friends to send you nasty replies, I'm quite capable of dismantling a little snivelling soft ***k conservative grub like you, with my little finger, whilst asleep.

    No stupid, I said, and read my lips idiot, Garrison became the leader of the "Liberal party, AGAIN", 30 Jan 1995, it is correct, didn't you know? Tisk tisk.

    The black day when he became the worst PM in history, proven by the fact he lost his own blue ribbon seat isn't in question. Although the date you quoted was WRONG too. Are you able to get anything right?

    But since you don't know, let me give you a quick history lesson, dumbo.

    John (Mr Garrison) Howard was elected Liberal leader, winning it from Peacock, in 1985.

    He then lost the Federal election to Hawke in 1987.

    Peacock took the leadership off him again in 1989.

    After trying loser but nice guy Hewson and dumb**se "things that batter, Downer", having absolutely nowhere to turn, they scraped the bottom of the barrel and revived the rotting corpse of Howard, 30 january 1995 and again made him leader.

    Tut tut, this ***king idiot Howard, is your hero and you don't even know when the cretin was elected leader or actually voted in?

    Garrison became PM on the 2nd March 1996 and became the worst PM in history just ahead of that other disgraceful so called human Menzies.

    FYI, although John (Mr Garrison - he does look like Garrison you must admit) Howard was brought back from the dead as many times as Beazley, in 1998 Beazley actually got 51% of the vote but lost. So much for a GST mandate aye?

    Lesson over for now. Go and study stupid, questions will be asked.

    Now, I did notice you didn't mention my little gibe in regards to Tooheys old? So since you have veered us off topic, please let me veer further.

    Why don't you just tell us all about the (your words from the comfort of your own hatred website) "alleged stolen generation" - "a bunch of ungrateful, resentful brats who are keen on big payouts".

    And (your words) "Why the hell should someone who was removed from unfit parents be given compensation because they are black"?

    I'm sure our Aboriginal friends would love to hear your most caring and humane views?

    What a piece of work you are.

    yeah! Damn Krudd joe -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122208)

    To hell with his honesty, telling it how it is and other sorts of truths... I elected him to tell me what i want to hear and de-value the lower class wages to continue the propping up of the higher end corporations! who cares that debt was at an all time high, and that this collapse is brought on by companies and people not been able to borrow anymore, K'Rudd should be over there in america kicking their **** and waving his magic wand to fix it!

    Mels Right!! To Hell with the truth and responsible socialist governing!, we want johnie howard back!!

    sniff sniff Joey boy Anonymous -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122218)

    What a surprise, the nobody lap dog once again sniffing at the anus of lord watchdog.

    rofl, how clever of you sydney mike joe -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122271)

    but at least read what i wrote before you get your panties all in a twist, i wasnt exactly agreeing with Mel there, unless of course you left school at the age of 7, you know before learning about sarcasm and satire, which if so, I am sorry for not spelling it in Big letters and for including no pictures so you can understand... I sincerly hope that maybe Kevin Rudds 'education revolution' helps you get back in there and learning again, imagine what you could achieve with a knowledge beyond 4th grade, ahh the possibilities

    @rofl Jason -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122277)

    Never fear Joe, while your hard work was wasted on some, one especially who appears to like to follow you and I around, I found your anecdotal comment most humorous.

    Until I wondered if some of the people who commented here and also your mate, may well have these thoughts for real, snort.

    I agree with you Joe, bring back Lil' Johnny [or as anon called him Mr Garrison - laughterbating] he'll fix the financial crisis.

    Anyone who earns $250K - $1m will pay 2 cents in the dollar tax and those above will obviously have no need to pay tax at all. So just to even it out, he'll introduce GST on milk, bread, fruit & veg, meat and shagging, for all us peasants.

    Thanks honest John, we miss you, dud. Oops, I mean dude.

    @@rofl Anonymous -- 06/02/09 (in reply to #320122283)

    That is because you are both idiots.

    rofl, how clever of you sydney mike Ardent -- 14/02/09 (in reply to #320122277)

    Kevvy's education revolution won't really start until Julia and he recover all the crayons from the union officials.

    @missing Anonymous -- 14/02/09 (in reply to #320123232)

    Oh, missing your crayons idiot.

    Dr Phil Anonymous -- 10/02/09 (in reply to #320121749)

    Who cares about Sol when Dr Phil is still actively involved with the Big 'T'.....be scared OPTUS Fanboys...be REAAALLLLY scared!!!!

    Start the countdown Patrick McCormack -- 28/01/09

    Solomon Trujillo planning on leaving before the year is out? That's good enough reason for the public to start having faith in Telstra again.

    When he does leave, hopefully Telstra doesn't repeat the same mistake they made by hiring him and look for someone who looks at the bigger picture instead of the company's bottom line.

    Another thing, with Sol being the last of the "three amigos", the only thing I can picture in my mind when he leaves is Queen's "Another One Bites the Dust"

    Solomon Trujillo leaving Anonymous -- 29/01/09

    Cool do we get to tar and feather him

    @Solomon Trujillo leaving Anonymous -- 29/01/09 (in reply to #320121790)

    Great idea.......................he certainly can't blow his bugle about what he has achieved, other than decimate the company's long term prospects, and Government co-operation.

    Decimation Merle -- 29/01/09 (in reply to #320121831)

    Decimating Telstra's long term prospects and Telstra's levels of co-existance and co-operation with other entities and government are Sol's only achievments.

    @Decimation Thomas -- 30/01/09 (in reply to #320121851)

    Perfectly summed up.
    Sol is all about qaurterly profits - who cares what happens in 5 years....he will be on his way back to the US with a big fat suit case full of 1000$ bills!

    Geez I hope an Australian is next to replace Sol.

    Go home now Sol Anonymous -- 30/01/09

    As a consumer he is hated with a passion- most Telstra employees loathed the 3 Amigo's as they have completely decimated service to Telstra customers , increased monthly costs by over 50% ,forced us all to monthly billing which I absolutely HATE and in my case I will leave Telstra at the earliest possible convenience , Sol has distanced Telstra to such an extent it is isolated outside the NBN Framework (a national disgrace) and he has destroyed the lives of many older experienced and valuable to us anyway ordinary Telstra employees , and carved the share price in half. Show me where he has added ANY value to the Australian consumer . It is also a fault of the government to partner decent investment in Telecommunications , we are a pathetic joke . When Australians start re-investing in long term infrastructure projects like dams , roads , rail , electricity , health services and jobs for Australians (not imported marketing slippery eels- chasing ONLY the fast and easy dollar for themselves) we may stand a small chance of surviving. Outsourcing and reliance on third world economies is now showing us all how dumb and stupid we have been and how easy it is for us to be collectively raped by elitist morons in our own country for heavens sake !!. McGechie take NOTE !. If you recruit another outsider you may as well blow Telstra up with your own hands .

    Ken

    Absolutely Trujillo Rex Alfie Lee -- 30/01/09 (in reply to #320121906)

    What a wonderful fellow is Sol,
    Sun shines right out of his butt,
    Gets jobs for his boys,
    Tech jobs he destroys,
    Keeps those in the know in a rut.

    What a jolly good fellow is Sol,
    He should wear a shiny red suit,
    With horns, hooves & tail,
    Destruction's his trail,
    Gives decent behaviour the boot.

    What a caring & sensitive Sol,
    A man worth more than his mess,
    He dresses so sheik,
    Telstra ending freak,
    Though wholly he couldn't care less.

    What a simply refined man is Sol,
    He's in the business of stress,
    When Sol finally goes,
    Takes our money & woes,
    Without Sol we're really soulless.

    @Absolutely Trujillo Anonymous -- 31/01/09 (in reply to #320121921)

    Wasn't that hilarious, and well worth posting on this forum..........you f..kwit. Why would you bother.

    @ @absolutely Anonymous -- 02/02/09 (in reply to #320122013)

    Sydney Mike, come clean?

    re @@absolutely Sydney Mike -- 02/02/09 (in reply to #320122117)

    Come clean about what ?

    Stupid Thomas -- 02/02/09 (in reply to #320121921)

    Yes...I can't stand Sol as much as the next guy, but that was just gay.

    Stupid Anonymous -- 02/02/09 (in reply to #320122072)

    That's Rex for you, obviously getting ready and in tune for his big night out in the Mardi Gras parade which is probably his forte.

    Mardi Gras? Rex Alfie Lee -- 05/02/09 (in reply to #320122090)

    Been there & done that. Oh I'm so crushed by being thrust into the limelight. Obviously though it takes someone who is to know, probably why you excremental verbalisers are so akin to Sol Trujillo.

    You all either work for Telstra or have shares in this scummy company so who cares what you have to say anyway. You are pointless & know it & just keep screaming back to re-iterate some innate involuntary reflux.

    As for Sydney Mike of all people, a nobody of incredible verbal tripe, who cares Mike? Who cares about you?

    Optus! Anonymous -- 06/02/09 (in reply to #320122384)

    Sydney Mike has admitted to being both a Telstra shareholder and an Optus customer, rofl.

    Oh shucks Thomas! Rex Alfie Lee -- 07/02/09 (in reply to #320122072)

    You know Thomas, perhaps you need to come out yourself bcoz only those who know, know!

    Nice one, Ken. Got it in one! Anonymous -- 03/02/09 (in reply to #320121906)

    We need to get on with rebuilding this country after years of neglect and profit chasing.
    Roads, hospitals, schools, dams (yes please!), telecommunications, have all proven in the past to be great employers and Nation builders.
    Let's face it - with increasing unemployment, the potential for an economic downturn, and the great need to rebuild, NOW IS THE TIME.

    Davos Anonymous -- 02/02/09

    Can somebody explain to me how Trujillo is able to spend so much of his time overseas at events that are seemingly not connected to the job he is paid $13mn per year to do. Does anybody care about his opinion at Davos? He is not and will never be a business icon who deserves to have his voice heard on the global stage.

    Chairmen and CEOs do nothing Mel Sommersberg -- 02/02/09 (in reply to #320122081)

    Sol's job is to attend 11 monthly meetings and discuss bullsh!t. The same applies to anyone in his position. That is why Sol, et al, can manage six or seven directorships at the same time and of course, be paid generously for each one.

    Chief operating officers and company secretaries do the real hard yakka.

    re Davos Anonymous -- 03/02/09 (in reply to #320122081)

    If he did not go to those overseas events, all you constant back stabbing whingers would be saying "why wasn't Sol there". So may I suggest that you astound us with your brilliance, and explain why in your opinion, he "doesn't deserve to have his voice heard on the global stage", because whether you like him or not, he is the present CEO and voice of Telstra. Why don't you throw in some positive comment, instead of continually casting negatives ? I'll tell you why, because you have nothing positive to offer, you clueless goose.

    I am positive that Sol is useless Mel Sommersberg -- 03/02/09 (in reply to #320122150)

    Do you have anything positive to say about Telstra? If so then lets hear it.

    If Telstra did something positive like some of the other ISPs do then they would get rave reviews from more people, including myself. I am not going to sit and vent untruths about Telstra just for the sake of being positive though. If the cap fits then wear it.

    As far as I can see Telstra hasn't done anything postive since 1991 when the telecommunications market began to be deregulated. Telstra has not once tried to adjust to the situation put in place by the Labor government of the time.

    I am positive that Sol is useless Sydney Mike -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122178)

    I bet its hard to decide what positives to do at times, when so many people want so much more, but are not prepared to pay for it ? What fabulous things have the other ISP's done so far, that have not leant heavily upon Telstra's infrastructure, which has already been paid for by the Australian Taxpayer.

    but sydney, i thought you were usually pro-telstra... Anonymous -- 05/02/09 (in reply to #320122298)

    I love this little comment of yours... "Telstra's infrastructure, which has already been paid for by the Australian Taxpayer." doesnt that mean that with that said all the forced open competition on their PSTN is actually a good thing then?? you know, seeing how the australian taxpayer paid for their infrastructure

    Paid For By The Australian Taxpayer Rex Alfie Lee -- 05/02/09 (in reply to #320122298)

    Good one Sidley, exactly our point. It was paid for by the Australian Taxpayer & that's exactly why Telstra should be doing what it was required to do but doesn't. Provide a reasonable service to all Australians for a reasonable charge.

    Telstra do nothing to fix infrastructure problems unless it is going to affect their bottom line, so the basic users get screwed when anything goes wrong. Things that were set up wrongly in the first place don't get the work done to upgrade these initial judgement errors to normal. Pair gains for instance stay as pair gain when they could easily be upgraded for ADSL. Telstra won't. Small community breakdowns get given mediocre support to repair line problems. The fact is that Telstra has removed so many linies that the ones that are left are so overworked as to be at wits end which is why they went out on strike in the first place. They are overworked & underpaid. Sol has done this single-handedly.

    The rest of the gutless board have basically been railroaded by Sol & his buddies (who have gone now & good riddance) & the techs have all been decimated. The truth is that Telstra would have a hard time putting in the fibre-optic themselves because they don't have enough experienced techs left, so whoever gets the NBN will have as many techs out of work available as Telstra would have if they were to build the NBN but Telstra aren't in the game at all. Well done Sol, you idiot!

    Paid For By The Australian Taxpayer Anonymous -- 06/02/09 (in reply to #320122387)

    You seem to think you have all the answers, so go and apply for his job ? You certainly won't dip out in the "high opinion" stakes.

    Mr Anony-Mouse Rex Alfie Lee -- 05/02/09 (in reply to #320122150)

    Your term "continually casting negatives" is rightfully stated as is the continually casting negatives. Sol deserves every piece of trash written about him. He is a destroyer & has destroyed 2 telecommunications companies before Telstra.

    Bottom line is that Sol believes in Sol's paypacket & nothing else.

    Davos Ardent -- 06/02/09 (in reply to #320122081)

    Just ask comrade Krudd...he seems to be pretty good at it.

    @Davos Anonymous -- 06/02/09 (in reply to #320122448)

    So you hate comrade Rudd and love the ultra conservative Sol?

    In the papers... Anonymous -- 02/02/09

    Telstra hunts new CEO
    John Durie | January 31, 2009

    TELSTRA chairman Don McGauchie has formally begun the process of finding a replacement for Sol Trujillo, who is expected to leave the company sooner rather than later.

    While search firm Egon Zehnder gets on with the job, Trujillo is in Davos to co-chair one of the key telecommunications sessions.

    His impending departure leaves 11-year board veteran McGauchie the chance to select someone to develop the next stage of Telstra's transformation before stepping down himself in a couple of years.

    The changes at the top come as the company is telling everyone who will listen that the Government would be mad to proceed with a national fibre network.

    [truncuated due to copyright concerns -- ZDNet News Editor Renai LeMay]

    leave Sol Anonymous -- 03/02/09

    I agree with most here, try being a customer these days. The company has been destroyed.
    In a real world, where they did not have fixed line monolopy, they would have not lasted. Even a fault now takes a week to get back on line. What a joke.

    Sol Trojillo has to go! Anonymous -- 07/02/09

    The Telstra board is now reaping the results of a bad decision. Why would any board hire a CEO with a dubious history, did they bother to research his past? It is also rare to import a CEO that will actually have the interests of Australians at the center of their motivations.

    And it has come to pass that Telstra is now a much less friendly, less Australian and less service oriented than it was when Sol took the reins, sad times for Australia.

    My only hope now is he departs quickly and we can appoint someone to clean up the mess and get back to providing quality service to the community.

    Idiots abound. Sydney Lawrence -- 15/02/09

    The retarded abuse that Sol has endured since his arrival in Australia would not have been accepted in any seriously developed country in the world.

    It is a credit to Sol that he has remained above the remarks by the self-serving detractors and proceeded to succeed with the Telstra transformation, to the horror of Telstra opponents.

    My hope is that when Sol does finally decide to return to his homeland, the United States, he does not judge all Australians by the few Australian hating loony tunes.

    Gawd Thomas -- 24/02/09 (in reply to #320123277)

    Transformation into what?
    It astounds me that some people have an intimate knowledge of this company when they sit on the sidelines.

    My understand of the 'Transformation' was to amalgamate legacy systems into one stream lined application, where all services were administered centrally.

    From what I hear internally the system sucks - is inherently slow and tedious.

    The General perception of Telstras customer service is now of a very low standard. Thats the fact jack.

    Sol will leave you in the dust, take his millions and go home. You will tout Next G no doubt as Sols triumph, when in reality it was the engineers and the people that supported a thoroughly untested network prior to its pushed forward release for short term profits.

    Lay it out please, in point form please - what this man has done to Transform Telstra. Educate me.

    All I see is - Horrific customer service, premium prices, unhappy\unmotivated workforce, stifled competition, overpaid arrogant board members and resistance to building an NBN that will benefit this country in the long run, not just in the 1/4 to boost shareholder profits.

    The definition of 'Retarded' is slow of learning. I think anyone that still believes Sol is here for the good of Australia is without question - slow of learning....

    $ol Trujillo Anonymous -- 28/02/09

    All those people lose their jobs so that this fat Capitalist can clean up big time. This is the sickening result of John Howards Privitisation. It's disgusting that one person takes gross amounts more than one needs to live comfortably while others on low wages lose their jobs completely. Talk about being taken to the cleaners. This is what happens when a Liberal government holds the reigns for too long. A legacy of Right Wing Greed.

Add your opinion

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured