|
|
To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu
-------------------------------------------------------------- This story was printed from ZDNet Australia. --------------------------------------------------------------
|
WiMax: The saviour of rural broadband? By Sally Whittle, ZDNet UK April 06, 2004 URL: http://www.zdnet.com.au/insight/communications/soa/WiMax-The-saviour-of-rural-broadband-/0,139023754,139143960,00.htm
special report What technology can blast data up to seven times faster and a thousand times further than Wi-Fi? Officially known as IEEE 802.16, WiMax could be the broadband story of 2004, thanks to backing from industry heavyweights like Intel, Nokia and Alcatel. Analysts expect it to account for anywhere from 10 percent to 50 percent of the wireless market within ten years -- and products haven't even shipped yet. While Wi-Fi hot spots provide wireless Internet access over distances of up to 100 feet, Wi-Max networks cover distances up to 30 miles. This means it has the potential to provide broadband access in rural areas that are too far from exchanges to provide wired or Wi-Fi access.
Distances up to 30 miles
WiMax is also likely to be used in places like campus sites, says Jeff Orr, product marketing manager at wireless hardware vendor Proxim. "There could be a company's headquarters, its manufacturing plant and a few remote locations all within close proximity to one another," he says. "To use a wired fibre-optic solution to network all of these buildings together would be an extremely expensive proposition. WiMax could offer a better total cost of ownership than a wired solution because recurring monthly costs of multiple T-1 and E-1s could be avoided and would come at a much lower cost than trenching." One of the strongest selling points of WiMax over other broadband access technologies is its scalability -- one base station can support thousands of subscribers without lowering performance. With a Wi-Fi network, administrators usually notice a drop in performance if more than 10 people access the Internet simultaneously. WiMax supporters also say that the technology is more flexible than the alternatives -- service providers can offer multi-megabit broadband services to rural underserved markets at distances of up to 70 kilometres and WiMax doesn't depend on a line-of-sight to provide service.
Costs have held WiMax back
The involvement of Intel has helped to further push standards, which has reduced the cost of WiMax kit enormously, Dineen says: "One of the reasons this technology hasn't succeeded so far has been cost --- base stations and related infrastructure costs could total upwards of $25,000," he says. "WiMax is still expensive compared to DSL or Wi-Fi, but it's getting less so."
Internet virtually anywhere
Whereas first generation WiMax suppliers charged as much as $1,200 for every customer site, this year's WiMax base stations cost around $500. Thanks to standardisation, prices should plunge even further in the future, to less than $200 for the gear that sits at the customer's site. Then, when WiMax migrates into laptops, the cost to buy into it will edge toward zero. Pyramid Research, one of the few analyst groups currently tracking WiMax, believes that four million people will be using the technology by 2008. Revenues from broadband wireless services -- which are mostly based on WiMax -- could top $2.1bn annually by that time. "We're very confident in the numbers of the industry analysts that say 10 to 20 percent of customers will be served by an alternative access technology such as WiMax," says Zvi Slonimsky, chief executive of the industry's largest WiMax supplier, Alvarion. "This will be a billion dollar market in the very near future."
A billion dollar market?
There are some barriers to WiMax's success. Some observers argue that consumers don't need yet another internet access technology, and that DSL and Wi-Fi are in too strong a position for WiMax to succeed. Currently, DSL accounts for 70 percent of European high-speed internet access, according to Ovum. One of the technology's limitations is that WiMax isn't designed for mobile use, adds Proxim's Orr. "The price-points and form factors of current WiMax products will not be appropriate for vehicular speed mobility," he says. "In this sense WiMax will extend the coverage area provided by Wi-Fi, as opposed to 3G, which is best suited for high mobility, low data rate applications."
Who needs another wireless technology?
ZDNet UK's Sally Whittle reported from London. For more coverage on ZDNet UK Insight, click here.
Copyright © 2009 CBS Interactive, a CBS Company. All Rights Reserved. |