The retiring brain boom



Baby boomers are retiring and the experience they will take with them represents a huge potential loss for Australian businesses. Mark Wheeler investigates how this know-how can be retained.

In the 2002 film "About Schmidt" Jack Nicholson's character, 66-year-old Warren Schmidt, retires from his long held insurance job to face an ambiguous future. At a loose end in the days afterwards, he finds himself loitering around his old office interfering with advice for his replacement. The film may hold a satirical and fairly colourless view of retirement, but it also shows another great concern held by employers -- that the Schmidts in their own office may also retire a great deal of the company savvy and tacit wisdom.

It's a given that years of experience are valuable. Job specifications demand it and people are hired almost exclusively because of it. What employers clearly seek is the real "know how" required to get the job done. But "tacit" wisdom extends beyond this. A long-serving employee will know the answer to so many problems -- from how to best handle a particular client through to who you might ask about ordering new copy paper. Not having someone with this offhand knowledge can put you at a distinct disadvantage. Sure you can write it all down and hand it to a new starter as an enormous file, or put it on a database, but the sheer volume and complexity of doing it this way can make it worthless to do so.

Australia's baby boomer generation is currently contemplating retirement, meaning a large percentage of the workforce is about to collectively exit, taking with them a large proportion of their wisdom. This represents more than a few wrinkles of concern to those left behind but it seems that until recently, no one has really been that successful at implementing a system to maintain continuity of tacit knowledge.

Knowledge management
The issue has broadly been considered from two different approaches, says Phillip Allen, services research manager at IDC. "There is the codifying of knowledge -- extracting, recording, structuring, and storing knowledge into a library of data; and an idea of the water cooler -- tacit knowledge that is more difficult to document."

Knowledge management (KM), the documenting, recording, and storage of useful business knowledge is a well known "codifying" approach used by many businesses with varying success. Other manifestations such as customer relationship management (CRM), or business intelligence (BI) all offer specific knowledge, analysis, or understandings for useful purposes, but cannot capture the tacit experience that can seem uniquely illusive and so advantageous to business.

Most managers would agree that even careful documentation and structuring of any organisation's processes, contacts, policies, approaches, habits, relationships, systems, expectations, and so on -- down to knowing not to bother 'Big Kev' when he's just got back from a sales meeting -- is never achievable at the instinctual level of a seasoned employee.

So as an unparalleled number of employees begin to invest in caravans and look to the north, wise businesses are beginning to rethink their relationships with their prospective retirees -- and it turns out that gold watches might indeed be flashed around the office for a while to come.

Advertisement

Talkback 2 comments

    Aging workforce and associates brain drain Sean Kelly -- 06/09/05 (in reply to #120120748)

    Interesting reading. Certainly a subject at the forefront of strategic organisational planning (3, 5 and 9 year) at the moment for my organisation and a number of clients. Knowledge management, capture and 'Corporate Memory' systems are becoming more and more prevalent in today’s organisations that are recognising the true risk of today’s skills shortages and aging workforce and the effect which it will have as we move forward. I wonder how Gen Y will rectify the oversights of the Gen X management philosophies?

    Ageing IT workforce Ken McAvoy -- 07/09/05

    As one of the baby boomers forced to consider retirement at age 55 only because no-one wants me I would personally refuse to just hand over my 30 plus years of knowledge , experience and wisdom to a company that has just shown me the door with no consideration for me , my family , my life work efforts and my needs. It is a joke surely that IT companies are only now crying over the fact that some of their best and most reliable workers are leaving in droves . Did these highly paid management gurus think they had control over our lives forever? Did they think they could dumb down the knowledge , skill , patience and perseverance we have had to apply for half a lifetime and put up with their bullshit US based management practices and theory? I think NOT !! The baby boomers are now back in a world of pure freedom where they can learn at leisure and think for themselves and experiment and research beyond what is regarded as the management norm. That is far more attractive and guess what .. money will not be the key issue. Most baby boomers have more than enough to retire gracefully and will exit as soon as possible. The task for management is to not try and replace key staff but to retain such knowledge and expertise by offering ongoing part-time training and mentoring roles that help business to continue without loss , allows time for a replacement to be effectively groomed and helps the prospective retiree to wind down at a pace that maintains self-esteem and encourages ongoing contribution. In other words Managers may have to change their anti-age attitudes and start being nice to their staff for a change and treat them as a valuable resource instead of just a number that is readily disposable. The Federal Government and Business Leaders have a major role to play in shifting attitudes away from the downsizing model to the right-sizing model where the right people are retained for the right reasons and age is respected not seen as being a process of automatic decline.

    Quite frankly the business that thinks they can do without these people and their knowledge will ultimately fail because they will repeat the mistakes of history over and over again paying through the nose each time.

Add your opinion

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured