Immigration NZ trials ID biometrics facelift

Immigration New Zealand has begun trials of biometric technology that uses facial recognition to verify the identity of people coming through New Zealand customs.

Passport

(Passport and Visa image by Josh Stewart, CC2.0)

The trialled technology from biometrics technology firm Daon takes a photo of the person applying for a visa, and then uses this photo to verify the identity of the applicant when they attempt to gain entry to the country.

"Over the next few years [Immigration New Zealand] plans to use biometrics to confirm the identity of visa applicants and travellers at the border," Immigration New Zealand said in a statement. "Any technologies adopted will have substantial privacy safeguards, in accordance with New Zealand privacy laws."

The trial is not currently being deployed in regular border control operations and a decision on whether the technology will be employed by Immigration New Zealand is not expected to be made for at least 12 months, the department said.

"The evaluation is a short-term trial that is not being deployed operationally," Immigration New Zealand said. "It is separate from the Immigration Global Management System (IGMS) replacement of the current Application Management System (AMS). IGMS, once approved, will provide future operational identity management capabilities for INZ."

Immigration New Zealand would not reveal the cost of the evaluation or the amount Daon will be paid for the trial, stating it was commercially sensitive.

Talkback

This is Esential,

It is only, certain personnel working within government departments that take advantage of any lax security measures, in order to obtain and sell-on certain data.
In the main for, Identity Theft and Cloning.
Either with "non-photographic" records!. and or for..."dual photographic use" where such data is cloned, using multiple names.
e.g. British Isle Citizens purporting to be, Austrailian Citizens, viz-a-viz, etc .
As this can apply to any nationality this is a clear indication of risk to national security.
A major loop-hole that every, State or Territory must make a pro-active effort to close.
With the full support of, The Australian Federal Government.

BrianwybornehuntleyBrianwybornehuntley October 21st, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+1) (0)

"Any technologies adopted will have substantial privacy safeguards, in accordance with New Zealand privacy laws."

This is one of those empty phrases that only tell you they've read the handbook "appease the media" and ticked all the boxes. The fact remains that once information
is out in the open,there's no taking it back. Even laws cannot put the genie back into the bottle. The only way to prevent information leaks with a high degree of confidence is to not keep the information in the first place. So, show us exactly what data is gathered, how it is stored, why anything is stored at all, who has access, how is ensured those people are trustworthy, and so on, and so forth. Suddenly it looks much less like the walk-in-the-park technical panacea the vendor promised you, does it?


The other problem is that biometry is chasing a castle in the sky. It does more harm than good. Where fingerprints and so on are pretty good for solving crimes, they're awful for casual "identification". Compare with your front door key. That's a token that says you may enter the house and proves it by unlocking the door. It's fairly weak, but good enough, most of the time. You hold on to your keys because they're precious to you. If the key gets stolen, well, replace the lock and all the keys, done. It's over, problem fixed.

Now suppose someone manages to fool those visual scans. We all assumed fingerprint scanners were infallible (at least those of us who hadn't seen the demonstration yet, which I have in, oh irony, about august 2001) but all it takes is a packet of gummi bears, as detailed elsewhere on this very site. So suppose visual scans can be fooled too, as supposing this is really not much of a stretch. The technology is new where fingerprint comparisons have been around for ages.

What then, of our identities? The biometrics turn out to be easily forged, and suppose you have your identity stolen that way. What then? You can't replace your fingerprints. Why should you have face-altering cosmetic surgery just because someone stole your passport?

In short, biometrics are a bad idea that do the victim more harm than good and actually aid the impersonator because people believe biometrics to be infallible. Clearly, that belief is wrong. Please stop pushing for ever better biometric scanning and return to passports with no more than a simple black-and-white photograph. Make them as hard to forge as you can, but ditch the electronics and the biometrics. And make sure it's competent humans that do the passport checking. We are not to be made slaves of our machinery.

CellarCellar October 28th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)
Add your opinion

In order to post a comment, you need to be registered. (Sign In or register below)

Post your comment

Terms of Service - As a ZDNet registrant, and by using this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understand our Privacy Policy.

Tech Blueprint

ZDNet Australia Live

シャネル バッグ : http://www.bagssalejp.org/ Chanel trap,chanel shekels,gucci bags,direct purse,poor recent Louis Vuitton keep...

36 minutes ago by bybrinkLync on Reservoir blogs: Fan fakes Tarantino diary

I guess but in both cases, dead body!

10 hours ago by Doubt on National Botnet Network coming: Earthwave

I think it's for the very reasons you mention in your first paragraph that there is no CBA. With the ideological differences and vested ...

10 hours ago by RealismBias on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

Good points; but how do you establish consensus about the terms of reference of a cost-benefit analysis? What is to be included? How far ...

11 hours ago by Gwyntaglaw on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

I live in a small country town & have done since 2002. When I got to this town it had no mobile phone & no broadband. The only reason w...

11 hours ago by fibretech on Regional review highlights NBN, mobile

Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it is really informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I...

12 hours ago by Uttedsips on Fujitsu Stylistic ST5011

Like most things in life, the devil is in the details. If a cost benefit analysis included a societal element, I'm certain nobody on eit...

12 hours ago by RealismBias on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

The coalition has done nothing else but keep changing their view over the last 2 years. -first it was "there is nothing wrong with the ...

12 hours ago by djz on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

Use the force Luke... FFS

12 hours ago by Beta on Regional review highlights NBN, mobile

michael kors outlet http://www.michael-kors-discount.com/#5923

12 hours ago by michael kors bag on Best iPhone travel apps

Hey butterflyeffecs and lex, Sorry you're not fans of this piece. But you're dead right in that it is the thoughts and experience of a se...

12 hours ago by LHopewell on Android fragmentation steers Vic Health

teen cams
http://www.aloe-vera.cz handjob

13 hours ago by MyncWenry on Fusion-io ioDrive (80GB)

We have fashional replica bags designer .Replica luxury bags sale here are perfect compromise of quality and price. The replica handbags ...

13 hours ago by Machelle on Telecom NZ CEO Paul Reynolds to leave

It's not a question of whether anyone at HSU would know how to do this, but whether they would have connections with people who could. T...

13 hours ago by meski on CT, phone clone

Fred, I can tell you what the difference between FTTN and FTTH is. FTTH means we will be developing technology and services that we sell ...

13 hours ago by andye on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

You are 100% right – Abbott is a paragon of tenacity. Now if he could only try that hard to get Malcolm Turnbull's phone number, we co...

13 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Very interesting to hear Ben and thanks for providing some real-world examples. I suspect the NBN has actually improved things for a grea...

13 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Hi Geoff, my opening paragraph simply suggests that the leader of the opposition party would rightfully be turning to his communications ...

13 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Very good point Richard – perhaps one of the most interesting things about this whole debate is how extensively it feeds the collective...

14 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Yes. I also wonder how much of this intentional subterfuge is actually playing out as part of Turnbull's master plan. Given the rough ri...

14 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

This story has been voted 12000 times in the last 24 hours!

16 hours ago, Is Bill Gates a great leader?

This story has been voted 10 times in the last 24 hours!

2 days ago, CeBIT 2012 opens: photos

This story has been voted 15 times in the last 24 hours!

2 days ago, Lenovo ThinkPad 3G tablet (32GB)

Facebook Activity

Keep up with ZDNet Australia

ZDNet Events Calendar

ZDNet Events Calendar