IE top trumps in business browser battle

Related gallery

ZDNet App Wrap: 14 May 2012

ZDNet App Wrap: 14 May 2012

Related video

A closer look at iOS 5

A closer look at iOS 5

Re-tweeted by

If you ask any Australian technology professional which web browser they prefer, you'll get a plethora of different answers. The debate about browser preferences is as fiery as the one about desktop operating systems.

And each has its supporters. Some prefer Firefox for its open-source nature, the rapid pace of its development and the sheer number of available plug-ins that can extend its functionality. Some prefer Google's Chrome for its speed and the stability generated by keeping each tab in its own memory envelope.

Still others remain hardcore fans of the Norwegian Opera browser due to its incredible feature list and speed. And, of course, Apple's own Safari browser (based on much of the same code as Chrome), retains fans, especially on the Mac OS X platform, but also a small user base on Windows.

What you won't find, however, when you ask this question in Australia's technology sector, is many people who profess to love Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser.

It was long-term criticism of Internet Explorer's non-standards-compliant features, bugs and lack of development, after all, that led to the explosion in the popularity of alternatives throughout the past half-decade. And despite rapid improvements in the browser's capabilities since that time, many technology enthusiasts still maintain bad memories of the software.

And yet there is one place in Australia that Internet Explorer remains firmly entrenched, with barely any rivals to challenge its virtual monopoly: on the desktops of the nation's large business and government entities.

The central agency in the Federal Government responsible for setting overarching technology policy is the Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) within the Department of Finance and Deregulation.

Browser logos

Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari and Microsoft Internet Explorer are all popular browsers, but corporate Australia still prefers Microsoft's offering. (Web browsers image by Sean MacEntee, CC2.0)

Questioned recently about browser choice in the federal public sector, a departmental spokesperson laid out a stark fact. "Over 96 per cent of Australian government personal computers use Internet Explorer as the web browser," they said. Firefox is used by just over 3 per cent of federal government desktops, while Chrome, Safari and Opera together have a share of just 0.25 per cent.

And it gets worse. Often those desktops aren't even running the latest version of Internet Explorer. In June this year, one of Australia's largest departments, Defence, confirmed it would upgrade its 90,000 desktop PCs from version 6 to version 7 of Internet Explorer, almost four years after the software was first released.

At the time, a Defence spokesperson said the department continued to look at alternate browsers, but the current upgrade to IE7 was to maintain compatibility for applications built on IE. "Defence does not allow staff to install their own software including desktop browsers on Defence networks," they added. "This restriction allows Defence to support the desktop environment and to manage security and vulnerability patches."

It's a similar situation in the private sector.

Ask any employee who's worked for large corporations in Australia and you'll hear a string of stories about how they had to petition their IT department repeatedly to get an alternate browser installed, usually because they don't have administrative privileges on their Windows XP machine.

It was only February this year that the Commonwealth Bank of Australia told staff that it would shortly be upgrading to IE7. The key factor holding the bank back over the past four years? The need to test a plethora of applications for compatibility with the new version before the roll-out took place.

Even the makers of Firefox themselves display somewhat of a lack of confidence in the ability of large local organisations to deploy their browser en masse. "We are not aware of any big Firefox roll-outs happening in Australia," said a Mozilla spokesperson when asked about the issue recently.

Light on the hill

Despite the apparent lack of interest in alternative browsers from large organisations in Australia, however, there are some examples of local corporate roll-outs that have taken place.

De Bortoli Wines, which has developed a reputation for the innovative use of technology over the years, standardised on Firefox in 2004 for all of its corporate desktops, both Linux and Windows. The company now also includes Chrome with its machines, with the group's IT manager Bill Robertson citing the Google browser's increased rendering performance on sites such as Google's Apps online office suite.

The executive said De Bortoli did experience some issues early on with websites that were only supported in Internet Explorer. "But this is much less of an issue now, with Firefox support becoming fairly mainstream," he said.

All the major browsers were currently 'much the same' in terms of enterprise supportability

In fact, now the shoe is on the other foot, with De Bortoli now developing and deploying services that rely on new standards such as HTML5, which Robertson said are not deployable with the current versions of IE. Version 9 of the browser, which is currently in beta, does support more of HTML5, however.

With Firefox having initially been targeted at individual PCs, in the past some have compared the Mozilla offering unfavourably to Internet Explorer, which benefits from the enterprise manageability features found across the Microsoft operating systems. However, Robertson said he believes all the major browsers were currently "much the same" in terms of enterprise supportability.

"Luckily, the majority of our desktops are single image Linux, so maintaining Firefox and Chrome on these devices is not a major concern for us," he said. "Our bigger issues are standards compliance and multi-operating system and multi-platform support."

For a greenfields site such as a start-up, Robertson recommends both Firefox and Chrome be deployed. "They both have their particular strengths (compatibility, performance and features) and while the internet has become quite critical to business it's still an evolving story," he said.

Another major organisation that has deployed Firefox widely is IT services, software and hardware giant IBM, which announced in July this year that Firefox had become its default browser.

The company's Australian chief information officer Steve Godbee, who is responsible for internal IT operations, said going back a few years, IBM had been predominantly using Internet Explorer, but Firefox had been organically adopted by its staff.

Adopting Firefox sat perfectly with the company's broad support for open standards, he said.

The new official browser hasn't been rolled out across IBM's Australian operations en masse though, Godbee said. Instead, the software is installed by default on new workstations and laptops that are issued, and it was more a matter of encouraging staff to use it internally if they weren't already.

Security updates and patches for Firefox are pushed out across the whole company as part of IBM's standard internal software update process, and users will have the choice to install patches later if they're not critical, or mandated to install them immediately if they are.

One of the reasons that open-source platforms such as Firefox have not been adopted broadly within ... Australia is because of the difficulty of structuring standard procurement arrangements to include what is essentially free software.

Going back a few years, Godbee said, there were some internal applications that used Internet Explorer which didn't support Firefox. But as time has gone by, they have broadly been updated to support the alternative browser.

And even if some still had problems, it wouldn't be that big of an issue. Godbee pointed out that within Firefox there's an option to use an emulator plug-in to use Internet Explorer's rendering engine within the Mozilla application, delivering complete compatibility.

Despite Firefox being anointed as IBM's official browser, however, employees don't have to use it. "Personal preference isn't stopped," said Godbee, noting that staff can still use Chrome and other browsers.

Godbee compares the organic growth of Firefox to that of Linux on server platforms. Instant messaging also grew like a virus within IBM, and the same with the changing face of the mobile phones used by staff. More staff use Nokia devices than any other handset, but BlackBerry also has a presence, and of course the new iPhone and Android platforms are making headway as well.

Ultimately, Godbee said, supporting staff is increasingly about building applications that are operating system-independent, desktop platforms that are based on cloud computing, for example.

The future

It has long been speculated at by technology sector pundits that one of the reasons that open-source platforms such as Firefox have not been adopted broadly within large organisations in Australia is because of the difficulty of structuring standard procurement arrangements to include what is essentially free software.

The spokesperson from the Department of Finance and Deregulation said in terms of the public sector, each agency had to make up their own mind. "An agency's decision to choose a particular browser is based on value for money, including the browser's interaction with the agency's existing operating environment, rather than just the capability of the browser," they said.

The Australian Government Information Management Office does not provide guidance to agencies on the choice of web browser.

But with consumer technologies increasingly making their way into large organisations, in a trend that analysts have dubbed "consumerisation" of the enterprise, it may be that IT directors don't end up with much of a choice, as Generation Y brings its own hardware, software and ultimately, browser preferences, into their new employer's organisation.

And consumer demand for Firefox in particular is strong.

According to data provided by Mozilla, as at August this year, there were about 1.8 million average daily users of Firefox in Australia, as well as 652,000 Australian downloads of the software that month.

That's a sizable chunk, especially when you realise that the total global average of daily users of Firefox at the same time was about 114 million. In short, roughly 1.5 per cent of total Firefox users globally are Australian. And the number is growing. As at August 2009, there were 1.6 million average Australian daily users of Firefox. That figure was much smaller — 1.2 million — in August 2008. In other words, although IE is still the dominant force, Firefox is a strong challenger, with Chrome and then Safari coming up behind.

IBM CIO Godbee compares his company's adoption of Firefox to the way that the similarly open-source Linux operating system gained traction on servers around the world over the past several decades since it was first released.

"Over a period of time it has been organic," he said. "And suddenly there it is, on a wide scale."

Talkback

My experience is that organisations or their IT departments don't use alternatives to IE simply because of their conservative attitude (a variant of the old "no-one ever got fired for buying IBM" saying).

Many organisations seem to spend a lot of money on so-called "main stream" commercial products like MS Office, Outlook, Exchange, even if cheaper or free alternatives exist. IE just happens to be part of that package. They often don't want to do anything "off the beaten track". They are afraid to rock the boat or go out on a limb. In other words it's mostly an emotional problem, not a clear-headed evaluation of the best or most appropriate technology available.

Doctor_SardonicusDoctor_Sardonicus October 1st, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+2) (0)

Doctor_Sardonicus is bang on the money with their comment. Of the five, multi-national business corporations I have worked at in the last 11 years, simply put, one does not get a choice about browsers (or any software, for that matter). One uses what is pre-installed on your machine, and will not, usually, be given the rights to install an alternative. Despite the fact that the reasons behind this "monopoly" are vastly complicated, it still stinks to high heaven.

ElhombreElhombre October 1st, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (+1) (0)

Along with both of these reasons above there was for a long time financial incentives to using IE rather than other browsers. People got used to using it & so it became main stream. It was a piece of junk comparatively but the opposition, Netscape eventually folded due to monopoly abuse, a charge that Microsoft paid for like having a slap across the wrist.

Rex AlfieRex Alfie October 2nd, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Those who remember Microsoft's filthy behaviour in previous years will never be content until they pay properly, hopefully by dropping below 50% market share in their major product lines. I wonder whether Bill Gates' charity work is in part an attempt to salve a blackened conscience ... assuming he has a conscience.

ascott1957ascott1957 October 5th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

I think it is the ability to control IE with Group Policy that is the main driver for corporate usage.

ScottM2ScottM2 October 5th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)
Add your opinion

In order to post a comment, you need to be registered. (Sign In or register below)

Post your comment

Terms of Service - As a ZDNet registrant, and by using this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understand our Privacy Policy.

ZDNet Australia Live

シャネル バッグ : http://www.bagssalejp.org/ Chanel trap,chanel shekels,gucci bags,direct purse,poor recent Louis Vuitton keep...

8 minutes ago by bybrinkLync on Reservoir blogs: Fan fakes Tarantino diary

I guess but in both cases, dead body!

10 hours ago by Doubt on National Botnet Network coming: Earthwave

I think it's for the very reasons you mention in your first paragraph that there is no CBA. With the ideological differences and vested ...

10 hours ago by RealismBias on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

Good points; but how do you establish consensus about the terms of reference of a cost-benefit analysis? What is to be included? How far ...

10 hours ago by Gwyntaglaw on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

I live in a small country town & have done since 2002. When I got to this town it had no mobile phone & no broadband. The only reason w...

11 hours ago by fibretech on Regional review highlights NBN, mobile

Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it is really informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I...

11 hours ago by Uttedsips on Fujitsu Stylistic ST5011

Like most things in life, the devil is in the details. If a cost benefit analysis included a societal element, I'm certain nobody on eit...

11 hours ago by RealismBias on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

The coalition has done nothing else but keep changing their view over the last 2 years. -first it was "there is nothing wrong with the ...

12 hours ago by djz on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

Use the force Luke... FFS

12 hours ago by Beta on Regional review highlights NBN, mobile

michael kors outlet http://www.michael-kors-discount.com/#5923

12 hours ago by michael kors bag on Best iPhone travel apps

Hey butterflyeffecs and lex, Sorry you're not fans of this piece. But you're dead right in that it is the thoughts and experience of a se...

12 hours ago by LHopewell on Android fragmentation steers Vic Health

teen cams
http://www.aloe-vera.cz handjob

12 hours ago by MyncWenry on Fusion-io ioDrive (80GB)

We have fashional replica bags designer .Replica luxury bags sale here are perfect compromise of quality and price. The replica handbags ...

12 hours ago by Machelle on Telecom NZ CEO Paul Reynolds to leave

It's not a question of whether anyone at HSU would know how to do this, but whether they would have connections with people who could. T...

12 hours ago by meski on CT, phone clone

Fred, I can tell you what the difference between FTTN and FTTH is. FTTH means we will be developing technology and services that we sell ...

12 hours ago by andye on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

You are 100% right – Abbott is a paragon of tenacity. Now if he could only try that hard to get Malcolm Turnbull's phone number, we co...

13 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Very interesting to hear Ben and thanks for providing some real-world examples. I suspect the NBN has actually improved things for a grea...

13 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Hi Geoff, my opening paragraph simply suggests that the leader of the opposition party would rightfully be turning to his communications ...

13 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Very good point Richard – perhaps one of the most interesting things about this whole debate is how extensively it feeds the collective...

13 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Yes. I also wonder how much of this intentional subterfuge is actually playing out as part of Turnbull's master plan. Given the rough ri...

14 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

This story has been voted 12000 times in the last 24 hours!

16 hours ago, Is Bill Gates a great leader?

This story has been voted 10 times in the last 24 hours!

2 days ago, CeBIT 2012 opens: photos

This story has been voted 15 times in the last 24 hours!

2 days ago, Lenovo ThinkPad 3G tablet (32GB)

Facebook Activity

Keep up with ZDNet Australia

ZDNet Events Calendar

ZDNet Events Calendar