Government agencies should actively participate in open-source communities and will be required to consider open-source options equally when going to tender, under new policy announced by Federal Special Minister of State Gary Gray today.
The new policy, announced by Gray on the Australian Government Information Management Office blog this morning, asks agencies to include a provision in their procurement plans for projects over $80,000 that the agency will equally consider open-source software along with proprietary software. All procurement decisions will be based on "value for money", the policy states.
In addition to this, suppliers to government agencies will also be required to equally consider open-source solutions when sourcing requirements to respond to tender requests from government. The policy provided examples of clauses agencies could use to ensure suppliers take open-source software into account when responding to tender requests.
"[Agency name] encourages suppliers to submit and/or develop open-source software for this tender," the document stated. "When responding to this tender, suppliers must demonstrate a willingness to actively consider open-source software throughout all stages of procurement, solution design and implementation in order to produce a product that demonstrates value for money and is fit for purpose. This may include incorporating open-source software components together with proprietary software components."
Gray said the original policy needed to be re-evaluated as the open-source industry had matured since it was developed in 2005.
"The government's previous policy, established in 2005, was one of 'informed neutrality'," Gray said in the blog post. "This meant that agencies took an unbiased position that did not favour open-source or proprietary software and procured the solution that was the best 'value for money' and 'fit for purpose' for their specific requirement."
"Since then, there has been an increase in the maturity of the open-source software products and the use of open-source software by governments around the world. In recent years, many governments have revised their policies to increase the adoption of open-source software," he added. "This revised Australian government policy on open-source software will ensure that we maintain international best practice and that our purchases of software will continue to reflect best value for money for the government."
AGIMO faced criticism last week over its decision to mandate the Microsoft-focused office document standard across government agencies over the OpenDocument standard.
The policy commences from 1 March 2011.
Carousel image credit: LCA2010 Open Day image by Christopher Neugebauer, CC BY-SA 2.0
Scott2010au 
HadEnoughOfMS 
rioriorio 
Rex Alfie 
Linkedin 
RSS Feeds 
Newsletters 
Alerts
Considering that a 'home' licence for Windows 7, in Australia, retails for AU$399.00 (Government, Enterprise, Charities, and others get it much cheaper) then it is a no brainer!
The minimum weekly wage in Australia has been lifted to: AU$569.90
Windows 7 pays for itself within 40 hours of 'gained' productivity -relative to a competing product costing nothing (AU$0.00).
Windows 7 pays for itself 'even faster' as the users are paid more per hour.
Since Linux is not actually 'free' in the sense that 'it costs nothing' (it will always have a cost, be it in time, human capital, download costs, support costs, etc) the choice is really quite simple!
Over the life of the Operating System (3 to 5 years per licence/per user) they are going to gain *a lot more* than 40 hours in productivity versus a product that costs nothing.
Sure it is fun to 'toy' with Linux in an educational environment, but at the end of the day -for most SMB's- Windows 7 is the better choice.
On a typical consumer PC Windows 7 might only add $50 to the cost of the machine - since many machines are sold 'inclusive' of the Operating System.
Complaining that you can't buy a PC without Windows 7 is akin to complaining that you cannot buy a Mac without OS X - nothing but utter folly.
Those that like to tinker with PC's can DIY with hardware and software (be it Linux, BSD, or something else) - unfortunately this *is not* the most time effective, nor the most cost effective, means to and end.
Q) When will Linux understand this?
A) Never, as it was not designed from the ground up to take this into account.