Google refuses to censor Chinese searches

Related gallery

CeBIT 2012 opens: photos

CeBIT 2012 opens: photos

Voted by

Scott2010auMay 21st, 2010

Google no longer intends to censor search results in China, and if the Chinese government baulks, it may take its servers and go home.

The stunning change in Google's policy towards doing business in China — which was always a complicated dance — came after Google discovered that it and other businesses were the victims of "a highly sophisticated and targeted attack" aimed at gathering information about human rights activists. It is not clear whether the Chinese Government was behind the attacks which, Google said in a blog post, were also directed against other US companies.

Adobe Systems later confirmed its involvement in the attacks with a statement:

Adobe became aware on 2 January 2010, of a computer security incident involving a sophisticated, coordinated attack against corporate network systems managed by Adobe and other companies. We are currently in contact with other companies and are investigating the incident. At this time, we have no evidence to indicate that any sensitive information — including customer, financial, employee or any other sensitive data — has been compromised.

Google released a lengthy blog post on Tuesday afternoon, authored by David Drummond, senior vice president of corporate development and chief legal officer, discussing the decision to review its policy toward China:

These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered — combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web — have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China. We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks, we will be discussing with the Chinese Government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognise that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.

Google entered China in 2006 with the launch of Google.cn. It knew at the time that it would be forced to censor search results in accordance with the policies of the Chinese Government. But it figured that it could live up to its famous "don't be evil" pledge without passing up the business opportunity in the fast-growing Chinese market simply by notifying web searchers that their results had been censored due to local laws.

However, in practice, there has been a tricky balance between Google's desire to spread information around the world and the Chinese Government's desire to limit the amount of information available on sensitive topics, such as the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989. The Chinese Government is believed to issue very vague guidelines as to what type of content is permitted and what is prohibited. The end result is that many internet companies in China censor far more than the government might actually deem offensive.

We recognise that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn and potentially our offices in China.

David Drummond, Google chief legal officer

Google did not say which human rights activists were targeted by the attack, nor would it comment on whether it believed the Chinese Government was behind the attacks. The attackers were unable to obtain the contents of Gmail messages written by two human rights activists in China, but they were able to access account information and the subject lines of an unspecified number of emails.

In addition, Google said it determined that someone was able to gain access to the accounts of several Gmail users who were human rights activists, which the company said was due to phishing schemes rather than a security breach at Google.

An industry source familiar with Google's investigation described the incidents over the past several months as "the straw that broke the camel's back", as far as Google's presence in China is concerned. Google is expected to meet with Chinese government officials over the next several weeks to discuss whether it will be permitted to offer an uncensored Chinese search engine.

A cash machine in other parts of the world, Google has struggled to replicate that success in China. The Baidu search engine is as dominant in China as Google is in the rest of the world, and Google trails it in China by a significant margin. According to ComScore, Baidu led the Chinese search market, with 63 per cent of searches, in September 2009.

Kai-Fu Lee, the subject of a fierce courtroom battle between Microsoft and Google over his acceptance of a job running Google's China operations, left the company last year to start his own business.

Representatives of Microsoft and Yahoo did not immediately respond to inquiries as to whether their policies regarding search in China would change as the result of Google's decision, though a Microsoft representative said the company had "no indication that any of our mail properties have been compromised". A US representative for Baidu also did not return a call seeking comment on Google's intention to offer an uncensored search engine in China.

Talkback

Add your opinion

In order to post a comment, you need to be registered. (Sign In or register below)

Post your comment

Terms of Service - As a ZDNet registrant, and by using this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understand our Privacy Policy.

ZDNet Australia Live

シャネル バッグ : http://www.bagssalejp.org/ Chanel trap,chanel shekels,gucci bags,direct purse,poor recent Louis Vuitton keep...

1 hour ago by bybrinkLync on Reservoir blogs: Fan fakes Tarantino diary

I guess but in both cases, dead body!

11 hours ago by Doubt on National Botnet Network coming: Earthwave

I think it's for the very reasons you mention in your first paragraph that there is no CBA. With the ideological differences and vested ...

11 hours ago by RealismBias on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

Good points; but how do you establish consensus about the terms of reference of a cost-benefit analysis? What is to be included? How far ...

12 hours ago by Gwyntaglaw on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

I live in a small country town & have done since 2002. When I got to this town it had no mobile phone & no broadband. The only reason w...

12 hours ago by fibretech on Regional review highlights NBN, mobile

Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it is really informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I...

13 hours ago by Uttedsips on Fujitsu Stylistic ST5011

Like most things in life, the devil is in the details. If a cost benefit analysis included a societal element, I'm certain nobody on eit...

13 hours ago by RealismBias on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

The coalition has done nothing else but keep changing their view over the last 2 years. -first it was "there is nothing wrong with the ...

13 hours ago by djz on NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011

Use the force Luke... FFS

13 hours ago by Beta on Regional review highlights NBN, mobile

michael kors outlet http://www.michael-kors-discount.com/#5923

13 hours ago by michael kors bag on Best iPhone travel apps

Hey butterflyeffecs and lex, Sorry you're not fans of this piece. But you're dead right in that it is the thoughts and experience of a se...

13 hours ago by LHopewell on Android fragmentation steers Vic Health

teen cams
http://www.aloe-vera.cz handjob

13 hours ago by MyncWenry on Fusion-io ioDrive (80GB)

We have fashional replica bags designer .Replica luxury bags sale here are perfect compromise of quality and price. The replica handbags ...

14 hours ago by Machelle on Telecom NZ CEO Paul Reynolds to leave

It's not a question of whether anyone at HSU would know how to do this, but whether they would have connections with people who could. T...

14 hours ago by meski on CT, phone clone

Fred, I can tell you what the difference between FTTN and FTTH is. FTTH means we will be developing technology and services that we sell ...

14 hours ago by andye on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

You are 100% right – Abbott is a paragon of tenacity. Now if he could only try that hard to get Malcolm Turnbull's phone number, we co...

14 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Very interesting to hear Ben and thanks for providing some real-world examples. I suspect the NBN has actually improved things for a grea...

14 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Hi Geoff, my opening paragraph simply suggests that the leader of the opposition party would rightfully be turning to his communications ...

14 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Very good point Richard – perhaps one of the most interesting things about this whole debate is how extensively it feeds the collective...

15 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Yes. I also wonder how much of this intentional subterfuge is actually playing out as part of Turnbull's master plan. Given the rough ri...

15 hours ago by braue on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

This story has been voted 12000 times in the last 24 hours!

17 hours ago, Is Bill Gates a great leader?

This story has been voted 10 times in the last 24 hours!

2 days ago, CeBIT 2012 opens: photos

This story has been voted 15 times in the last 24 hours!

2 days ago, Lenovo ThinkPad 3G tablet (32GB)

Facebook Activity

Keep up with ZDNet Australia

ZDNet Events Calendar

ZDNet Events Calendar