They say you should love the sinner and hate the sin, but Shadow Minister for Finance and Debt Reduction Andrew Robb seemed to hate just about everybody as he fronted the media with Tony Smith to announce the Coalition's long-awaited broadband policy.
Shadow Minister for Finance and Debt Reduction Andrew Robb is biting the "talentless" hands that will feed his party, before it has even been elected. (Credit: YouTube)
With a few acerbic, ill-considered comments he not only disparaged the careers and capabilities of the hundreds of people who are working hard to deliver the fibre NBN revolution, he also threatened to bring the Coalition's own broadband plan crashing down around his ears by creating a self-fulfilling prophecy that may just come true.
Robb, you may recall, was the grumpy old Luddite who stood next to Smith in Toby Abbott's absence, arguing the Coalition's case for fiscal responsibility while ignoring questions about Abbott — and cutting off journalists when things got even a little bit heated, such as when one journalist mentioned the word "costings". Suddenly Tony Smith had to leave, Robb said, but both managed to stick around for many minutes' more worth of questions once the topic was changed. (The same thing happened when a journalist questioned the Coalition's reliance on the private sector to build its networks).
In an interesting turn, however, Robb, who also happens to chair the Liberal Party's Policy Development Committee, decided the press conference was an ideal time to launch a personal attack on NBN Co's team of hard-working engineers. Labelling the company "the usual stodgy, massive, bureaucratic, government-owned monopoly", he boldly proclaimed that the organisation was filled with "talentless" staff and would not attract "highly skilled, highly innovative, highly specialised talents ... these people value being part of an entrepreneurial creative industry and that is what we will seek to promote".
The mind boggles. Robb may have thought he was attacking a Labor party machine, but what he clearly had not considered was that he was actually taking on the same people his party will have to rely on to deliver the Coalition's own broadband vision. The party's own policy depends on it, right there in black and white (PDF): "By drawing on selected personnel and resources of the current NBN Co and telecommunications regulators such as ACMA and the ACCC ... it will take full advantage of the work done and expertise held by NBN Co ... its management will be required to prepare a new business plan for approval by the minister."
Robb seems to feel these technically minded types would not be attracted to building a world-class, nationwide fibre network ... but would stick around for an inevitable staff cull by the Liberals, followed by a mandate that they throw out their work to date and focus on building a significantly poorer, slower and less capable network. This is the equivalent of buying Google, firing half the staff and forcing them to write spam emails for a living.
Excuse me for a moment. Robb seems to feel these technically minded types would not be attracted to building a world-class, nationwide fibre network like they are already doing now, but that they would stick around for an inevitable staff cull by the Liberals, followed by a mandate that they throw out their work to date and focus on building a significantly poorer, slower and less capable network. This is the equivalent of buying Google, firing half the staff and forcing them to write spam emails for a living.
If Robb thought he was speaking sense, he should be ashamed of himself; he has let himself and his party sorely down by spelling out exactly the contempt with which he views all of them. Not only that, but if Robb had bothered to look beyond his own callous rhetoric, he would realise that NBN Co is currently home to pretty much the largest collection of telecommunications brains in the country.
I know this because I recently spent an inordinate amount of time learning about these people and their qualifications; the results are collated in our NBN Co files and do, if I may say so, make for interesting reading.
After all, the company is headed by a robust and rational Mike Quigley, who had a distinguished career at one of the world's largest telecommunications providers and took on the NBN Co appointment as an intellectual challenge more than out of any financial need. Steve Christian, head of network operations, ran Optus' networks business for years.
CTO Gary McLaren is a lawyer and engineer who headed the communications industry's engagement with NBN Co. CIO Claire Rawlins served as chief operating officer with major US telco Qwest. Jim Hassell, head of product development and sales director, ran major IT vendor Sun Microsystems for years. CFO Jean-Pascal Beaufret spent years managing France's entire tax system, for goodness' sake.
You might be interested in:
These are not lightweights by any sense of the word. In fact, NBN Co's senior executives have hundreds of years in senior positions at many of the world's leading telecommunications carriers and providers. These people know their technology, their regulation, their law more than just about anybody in the world — and I'd put my money on many of them against Robb in a financial battle of wits, too.
If Robb had bothered to look beyond his own callous rhetoric, he would realise that NBN Co is currently home to pretty much the largest collection of telecommunications brains in the country... Many of them interrupted perfectly excellent, rewarding careers to take up the challenge that NBN Co provided. Make no mistake about it: NBN Co is Australia's own Manhattan Project.
Even the NBN Co rank-and-file is mostly comprised of bright sparks — the people who have designed and run the fixed and mobile networks of Optus, Vodafone, Three and others over the past 20 years or so. Many of them interrupted perfectly excellent, rewarding careers to take up the challenge that NBN Co provided. Make no mistake about it: NBN Co is Australia's own Manhattan Project.
Robb's conclusion that these people are anything but "highly skilled, highly innovative, highly specialised talents" shows the depth of his ignorance — not only of NBN Co, but of his party's own policies. Given that he heads the committee that authors these policies, he should really resign from that position in disgrace; to front the media at the launch of a major policy, then show such utter disregard for the contents of that policy and the people it affects, is simply inexcusable.
He will not, of course, resign, but if this sort of angry diatribe indicates the Coalition's position towards NBN Co and reflects its communications philosophy, we cannot but question Robb's judgement and the fundamental premise of the party's policy.
We must also wonder exactly what would happen, should the Coalition win and show up at NBN Co's doorstep for a bout of team building. I cannot speak for Mike Quigley, of course, but if I were in his position, doing a job for free because I loved it, then being re-tasked to execute such a mind-bogglingly ordinary policy, I would be the first one out the door. I suspect he has better things to do than to waste his time building a retrograde, poorly-specified network with a shoestring budget and a derisive administrative philosophy that has already labelled its staff as incapable bludgers.
One suspects many others would also take a Coalition victory as their sign to find a more interesting challenge against which to apply themselves. This would certainly fulfil the Coalition's vision of a more streamlined NBN Co, but it would also ensure what I can only imagine would be a defeated culture of frustrated ex-innovators beaten down by a bureaucracy as stodgy and massive as anything Robb could have ever imagined.
This is the second in a series of election rants, one for each of the deadly sins and each of the seven days that are remaining until the election. The first was entitled "wireless greed". Renai LeMay plays the devil's advocate.













" Make no mistake about it: NBN Co is Australia's own Manhattan Project."
Hey that's really funny, you are joking of course, hey hang on a sec you're not it is repeated in the highlight box on the right hand side - sorry it's still really funny it has to be satire, "Australia's own Manhattan Project" - LOL.
We do have some physics purists in the audience -- wonderful! Fair enough -- if the comparison with the Manhattan Project offends anybody's sensibilities, let's call NBN Co the government's own Ocean's 11. The point is that these are talented people, brought together to leverage their strengths to deliver a significant and world-changing outcome. Anybody who has sat in on one of NBN Co's technical briefings would find it hard to argue with that.
I might also mention that, in the same appearance in which he stood up and slandered the people of NBN Co, Andrew Robb also had to apologise for misplacing a decimal point in one of the financial-related press releases he had just released. http://bit.ly/cVSFEj. You know, just sayin'.
Nothing to do with 'physics purists in the audience' or even placing a new label of 'the Governments Ocean 11' on them - what is it about journalists and their obsession with emotive based labeling and categorizing to help beat up some mundane subject matter or a sound bite, but I digress.
Fibre to the home is nothing new certain countries overseas have had it for years, the like of Telstra, Optus, PipeNetworks, Uecomm (now Optus owned), TransAct and others have been laying fibre across Australia for years.
From memory when Fibre to the Node was originally mooted Telstra stated that virtually all their main exchange areas were already fibered up both before the exchange and backhaul out of the exchanges and it would not have taken them long to offer a Fibre to the node product to the market, there is just not just copper in the Telstra ducts all over Australia.
The companies involved with the laying of fibre and the associated switching networks for the NBN Co are all internationally based communication companies with vast experience overseas implementing such infrastructure on a large scale with whom the NBNCo just out source to do the job.
The reality check is as you well know is that this particular multi billion dollar project is politically based rather than technically based, when the FTTN tender (which after all is what Rudd & Conroy went into the last election with as their internet election platform and it was what the voters voted for!) farce fell on its face and the Labor Government desperately needed a face saver the NBN $43 billion rabbit was magically pulled out of the hat, sorry voters and FTTN tender applicants we just moved the goal posts about 5000 meters to new football ground.
The technical bit is trivial and the easy bit in the scale of obstacles the NBN rollout faces!
'Governments Oceans 11' - you satire is hilarious - it is satire I hope?
:)
"Fibre to the home is nothing new certain countries overseas have had it for years, the like of Telstra, Optus, PipeNetworks, Uecomm (now Optus owned), TransAct and others have been laying fibre across Australia for years."
And yet, none of those companies bothered laying fibre to peoples homes (except in extremely limited "test" areas), just for their own backbones.
I live in the 6th largest city in Australia, and the only reason I have decent broadband is because I have cable (which was more luck than good planning on Telstra's part, as they dumped their cable rollout after laying it in limited areas).
I like the NBN cause I'll finaly have a real choice in who I can get broadband from. And many other Aussies are in the same boat as me (or worse) thanks to the companies you mentioned only being interested in "investing" where the bucks are. The NBN will go to _everyone_, so yes, the NBN IS a "big thing".
"have cable (which was more luck than good planning on Telstra's part, as they dumped their cable rollout after laying it in limited areas)."
The reason Telstra and Optus stopped their rollout is that they were losing money on it, and that's including pay TV into the infrastucture capability.
The NBN will also bleed millions - but that's ok.
"I like the NBN cause I'll finaly have a real choice in who I can get broadband from."
Well you don't actually, if you want fixed line BB it's NBN or nothing, that's not choice, hang on a sec it's just like today with the Telstra infrastructure overseen by the ACCC just like the NBN will be!
They should have called the NBN Co the PMG, we could have repeated history and started all over again.
1. Full public ownership.
2. Partial public/private ownership
3. 1000% private ownership
PMG/Telecom/Telstra Mark 2 anyone?
Umm, Telstra and Optus both lost money (Optus about $1.bI believe and Telstra about $1b) simply because the process was sabotaged by Telstra.
Optus chose to build in areas where Telstra were underservicing. But as soon as Optus started their roll out, Telstra intentionally did like wise in the same area. It was claimed, somtimes, even in the very same street.
Telstra's sole intention was to put Optus' roll out, ouf of business at any cost and it succeeded...because that's the sort of guys they are (well were, benefit to Thodey).
So that scenario is not even vaguely similar to the NBN...!
As for the NBN being the new Telstra, not if it's wholesale only. So again your FUD equates to ...0
1000% eh, LOL...?
"Optus chose to build in areas where Telstra were underservicing"
You mean Optus hoped they would be left alone and be the only fixed line provider of pay TV and cable broadband and make a killing.
"Telstra's sole intention was to put Optus' roll out, ouf of business at any cost and it succeeded.."
Hello - it's called competition, obviously Optus didn't like having a Pay TV cable BB competitor- sorry that's not how the 'free market' and competition works.
I am sure all the mobile phone operators would wish they had no competition either.
"So that scenario is not even vaguely similar to the NBN...!"
Well they are both were and still are fixed line alternatives to the Telstra copper/exchange link and they both will/are bleed millions - the comparison is spot on.
"As for the NBN being the new Telstra, not if it's wholesale only.'
But a monopoly is a monopoly, putting the words NBN in front of it changes nothing, and it gets even better, the 'company' that owns the NBN also owns the communications regulator and controls the legislation that the regulator operates under - it doesn't come much better than that eh?
"1000% eh, LOL...?"
Cheap shot time I see, this posting system doesn't allow you to edit mistakes after you have posted, it should be 100% (but you know that), but hey we can all do that if you think it counts.
ouf eh, LOL...?
Apologies for the 1000%, thought you meant it and was being a smart **se...
No it wasn't competition at all, because as soon as Optus decided to invest in places places Telstra weren't interested in, all of a sudden Telstra were interested...When Optus decided they couldn't afford to keep doing this because of Telstra's tactics, magically Telstra changed their tune too and discontinued soon after, too.
This is not competitiveness, it's anti-competitiveness and something frowned upon. It was the 800lb gorilla flexing it's muscles and nothing else...something not welcomed in civilised society.
Thing is you supported Telstra rather than the Australian consumer who would have benefitted from Optus' investment... and were probably one of those who, after Telstra received their freebie PSTN, expected others like Optus to invest?
But if you believe that was ok, then you'd agree that "competition" to Telstra from the NBN, who can do to Telstra, as Telstra did to Optus is fair too then?
The Australian people will own the NBN. The Company who runs the NBN is NBN Co. Neither own nor run the ACCC. Also a retailer who doesn't wholesale too, cuts out the inequalities we have had for the last 18 years with Telstra...
LOL again...!
Probably best to forget your stake in Telstra before coming here to regurgitate disproved NWAT rhetoric...!
...When Optus decided they couldn't afford to keep doing this because of Telstra's tactics, magically Telstra changed their tune too and discontinued soon after, too.
SingTel is a bigger company than Telstra and they couldn't afford it eh?- they both discontinued because it wasn't paying its way, why extend the rollout and lose even more money?
"and were probably one of those who, after Telstra received their freebie PSTN, expected others like Optus to invest?"
No, and Telstra didn't get a freebie PSTN.
"The Australian people will own the NBN."
Oh I see, so you have got your NBN Co share certificate then have you, what does it say, especially the bit about when you will get your first dividend? :)l
"The Company who runs the NBN is NBN Co."
Owned by the Australian Government and whose staff all the way to the CEO is paid for by the Australian Government, it is a public service, just like the ACCC.
"Also a retailer who doesn't wholesale too,"
Get it right, you mean a wholesaler that doesn't retail too, it's still a FTTH infrastructure monopoly.
"Probably best to forget your stake in Telstra"
I don't have a stake in Telstra.