Conroy explains his magic filter

Twisted Wire

Phil Dobbie

Tune in weekly for Twisted Wire, Phil Dobbie's weekly podcast on the tangled mess that is Australia's telecommunications industry.

Play or download the Twisted Wire podcast below:

Download

Embed podcast:

In today's Twisted Wire, we put the screws on Communications Minister Stephen Conroy about his controversial internet filter policy.

Among other things, Conroy says the filter was always intended to stop people inadvertently encountering internet nasties, and that there was never an intention to use the Australian Communication and Media Authority's full blacklist.

That sensitive list, Conroy says, will only ever have a few thousand sites on it, updated regularly, and the government is open to discussion about how it will be implemented.

Conroy is copping a lot of flak for the policy but is intent on it as one of a range of approaches to try and limit access to child pornography and other nasty material. For most of us it shouldn't matter, so why are people getting so hot under the collar about it?

Well, there are three reasons. The first is the question of speed. If we believe the trials, both the Enex TestLab trial and a separate one conducted by Telstra, and if we're only talking about blocking a few thousand URLs then there will be a negligible impact on the performance of the internet. No big deal!

The second reason is the fear of precisely what it is we are blocking. Professor Catherine Lumby from the University of NSW joins the discussion, suggesting if the filter is to proceed we need to look at how we classify material. For more, read the report she co-authored, Untangling the Net: the scope of content caught by mandatory internet filtering.

The third reason is "everything else". As Peter Corenous, chief executive of the Internet Industry Association explains, there could be many inadvertent issues that need to be examined. The cost burden of applying the filter could be one of them, particularly for smaller ISPs.

Ravi Bhatia, CEO of Primus, is another industry supporter. I ask him if he can see any problems with the approach, or is Senator Conroy right to push ahead regardless of the vocal opposition from the anti-censorship brigade.

What do you think? Whatever your views on the subject, don't let it ruin your Christmas! And yes, we'll squeeze in one more Twisted Wire before then. You can also read the consultation paper on measures to increase accountability and transparency for Refused Classification material.

Talkback

Is it any wonder...

that he's copping flak? If this is "one of a range of approaches to try and limit access to child pornography and other nasty material. ", it's time to look at something else.

His proposal simply - DOESN'T WORK - in this respect. It is a complete waste of public money and as a "side effect" it just happens to allow the government to control access to information.

How many times does this have to be pointed out to this luddite?

AnonymousAnonymous December 17th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Agreed...

I don't care about the free speech issues anymore. They are totally irrelevant as the main point about this proposal is that it will be totally useless and a BIG WASTE of our money. That's what makes me angry. That money could go to any number of worthwhile causes yet it's going to wasted because Conroy is in bed with Australian Christian Lobby. It's a strange day indeed when I have to vote Liberal because they have become become the more progressive party, but hey, times change I guess.

Daniel du PrieDaniel du Prie December 20th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Your right Steve it isn't a silver bullet.

It's a suppository.

Eric PinkertonEric Pinkerton December 17th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

The biggie...

Scope creep. Successive governments will expand the scope of the filter there is absolutely nothing to prevent them from doing so.

The filter as it stands to be implemented at present, will be used to block politically contreversial subjects and content (euthinasia, and abortion awareness sites) if this does not qualify as a restriction of political freedom I don't know what does.

Most importantly of all, it won't work. Its a colossal waste of tax payer money that should be spent on Australia's ****-poor hi-tech crime units. The filter wont prevent kids from being abused, it wont help those that have already been abused and wont assist in the capture of those who sponsor or distribute it. It's a complete and utter failure as a policy.

AnonymousAnonymous December 17th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Testing Censorship

Let's see if http://www.fuckkevinrudd.com becomes blocked.

AnonymousAnonymous December 17th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

I love how...

Conroy talks about "mis-information" as one of the main reasons why so many people are against the filter. Um, Conroy is the leader of mis-information given the way he changes his tune to suit his own argument/agenda.

A 10% drop in speed may not seem like much to him but our "broadband" is already laughable compared to other developed countries. A 10% drop is still a 10% too much when our speeds are already relatively slow.

There are so many flaws in this trial. As already pointed out, the testing was never carried out on speeds above 8Mbs. The effect of the filter above that is unknown, which is of great concern given the goverments pledge for the NBN with a speed of 100Mbs.

How many customers took part in the trial? How can these results be extrapolated to a much larger sample size and a larger load on the filter?

Conroy constantly talks about other countries having implemented their own filters. How many countries have made it mandatory?

At the end of the day, the filter will simply not work. People will be able to by-pass the filter with ease. What a complete waste of tax payers money.

DanielDaniel December 17th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Filter anything to do with Catholics

Can we please have every reference to word "God" or "Catholic" and replace it the word pedophile.
I would like to see the whole bible blocked as I find its existence very offensive. Why don't they get a Christian Ubuntu as it has all the filiters already in it.
They are probably all too stupid to know how to use it.
The internet is not like TV or radio.

AnonymousAnonymous December 17th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Extra latency no big deal???

Dear Phil Dobbie,

Are you stating that extra latency is no big deal? Try adding extra latency to your packets that carry voip, gaming or trading orders.

Given the technically questionable results of the Enex tests, I think the latency will be far worse than what they've reported.

AnonymousAnonymous December 17th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Home Filter

It's up to parents to watch their kids. Parents should have computers in a main area of the house. They can easily lock it down and those who try to circumvent the software would circumvent Conroy's clean feed anyway. There's no reason to have a national filtering scheme. It's becoming too much of a police state.

Merari SchroederMerari Schroeder December 17th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Parental scrutiny is the only option.

My nephew had a computer relatively unsupervised in his bedroom. As a teenager he had downloaded topless images of Amanda Tapping from "Stargate SG-1" and similar. Knowing full well that a teenager is able to access this sort of information faster than I can track it, I allowed this on the condition that if I ever found anything more "controversial" his hard-drive would be remotely wiped without warning.

Interestingly, the only times we ever had virus trouble on his machine were:
- his birthday, when a couple of friends tried accessing more dangerous material
- one of his sisters visiting and playing a SIMS style game that looked safe enough, until you complete the game, and the avatars then copulate on screen!

At no time did an audit of the machine reveal that my nephew had been responsible for visiting RC type sites, or has playing "Halo" online suddenly been forbidden?

I am of the strong opinion that the wowsers behind this scheme are those same kids who used to get busted at school for passing around "dirty magazines".

MicMic December 17th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

bah

You should have interrupted when Conroy made 1 proposition instead of rambling on for 5minutes then trying to argue against all the points.

AnonymousAnonymous December 17th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Filter.

We're OUTRAGED by this filter proposal.

Did you know that some of the TOP 25 web sites used by Australians will be blocked when the filters in place, sites even more popular than the Australian portal to Google.

This is such a bad plan, if it becomes law, Labor will lose my vote forever.

Simon ShawSimon Shaw December 17th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

sensorship

a real worry when the Govt gets control on what we read, who knows what is done with this data

AnonymousAnonymous December 18th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

It's a waste of time money and WILL hinder investigations of online crime

I as someone with NO criminal intent will be buy a VPN connection in a 'safe' country and be doing all my surfing from there! So if I'm going to do it do you think the information will be easy enough on chat forums to find out for pedophiles? and other criminals? Labour needs to start listening to the IT industry before going off half **** and thinking they know all about all!

AnonymousAnonymous December 18th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Free VPN

if you can stand a few ads here and there just get Hotspot Shield from hotspotshield.com
Free VPN, unlimited bandwidth.

So much for the filter LOL

Daniel du PrieDaniel du Prie December 20th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Ravi, are you serious?

Ravi, where do you come to the conclusion that most Australian's want this? The previous Govt's downloadable personal filter was barely downloaded and used by anyone. In fact that's the reason why the current Govt removed it in the first place.

Not sure if you've been reading any of the news on this (funny that they tried to sneak it through at Christmas time AGAIN), but the whole proposal is getting a smashing across anywhere that has comments. For your uneducated reference:
- http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/the-truth-about-net-filtering/
- katelundy.com.au/2009/12/17/my-thoughts-on-the-filter/

AnonymousAnonymous December 18th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

My problem with it? Conroy.

Again Conroy is using non-technical terms to describe what will be blocked in an attempt to glaze over his real intentions.

What are "Nasties" and who will be defining what is nasty? Bad words, naughty pictures, talk about abortion and euthanasia, anti Catholic websites?

He just needs to come right out and say that sites like Red Tube will be completely blocked, then the public can decide for themselves if they want this censorship to invade their lives.

AnonymousAnonymous December 18th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

it all comes back to Conroy

How the hell can someone who
knows absolutely nothing about IT
and the way the internet works
make these decisions!
its absurd??
This filter will NOT stop anything
except for really stupid people who
wouldnt be on the net for dodgy reasons anyway

AnonymousAnonymous December 18th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Wasted opportunity

Conroy answers questions so rarely. What a shame he wasn't asked why he's blocking all of RC instead of just the illegal sub-categories within it. Also a pity he wasn't asked about why the trial was only testing speed impacts under 8mbs, which is about 1/12 of the expected speed under the NBN.

Mark GMark G December 18th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Conroy's NewSpeak

The lead issue, the headline-grabbing first mention in most of Conroy's ramblings is that the filter will block pedophile sites.

Pedophile sites are, quite rightly, illegal now and always have been. Where Conroy appears to show his ignorance (or venal desire for an eyecatching headline) is that pedophile sites are already blocked as a matter of policy by most ISPs, so they are not floating around the public domain at all. In other words, the Great Australian Rabbit-proof Firewall will make no difference here.

So, Senator, your Plan B is? Resign?

AnonymousAnonymous December 18th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Conroy admits his filter doesn't work.

"Inteviewer: So it's not necessarily a secret list? You're open for discussion on that?
Stephen Conroy: Ah... look the problem, the problem with, ah publishing the list. And this is, this is one that we've really struggled with, because this is a real conundrum. When ya publish a list of the names of books that are banned, ya don't provide the access to the content in the book. If you publish a list of URL addresses, you're providing access to the content. and that's, that's where the challenge is."

Ummm, I'm sorry what? People only need the URL of the filtered website to access it? Then what the hell does your filter do?

Gerard CaulfieldGerard Caulfield December 18th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Red Herring

Thanks to the tag team of Conroy and Atkinson, I guess we won't even be able to read a _review_ of an RC game like Aliens Vs Predator or L4D2?

I find it extremely distasteful that a government wants to filter my information through their criteria/mechanism and feel the whole "filter the filth" line they are using is a diversion to the real issue that, according to the government, Australian adults must be treated like children.

AnonymousAnonymous December 19th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

A Political Weapon

A filter is a political weapon which will definitely be used and abused whoever is in power and most likely be a source of corruption. Imagine how many lobby groupswill try to influence which gets into the list!
Whoever wants to access illegal materials can easily do it anyway. Will they block proxies as well and foreign based vpn as well?
Wrong solution to the wrong problem? Can they not concentrate on (1) making internet faster. My ISP say that my spead can reach 24 mbps but the line speed is less than 5 mbps and a lot probably in the same boat. And (2) can they not make it more affordable including the mobile broadband?
And lastly, by implementing a filter, you just simply made paedophiles more creative in trying to traffic illegal materials. Without a filter, they will just resort to conventional means and you can easily catch them. With a filter, you take them to an arena which you can barely wrestle!

AnonymousAnonymous December 20th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Misunderstood??? Bull@#$%

He thinks we are misunderstood, what a complete idiot.

AnonymousAnonymous December 20th, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Mandatory censorship will always lead to evil

If only he was as keen to roll out the labour fibre network as promised at the election. I think that was used pretty successfully to win people over. This filter would be a good idea if it was optional and not compulsory. Mandatory censorship is just wrong in any democracy. And the fact that the censorship list is in itself "censored" is very alarming. Any site if deemed by the labour government to not be in their interest can be censored and nobody would be the wiser. That is a very serious issue. More than any child porn, etc as evil as they may be. Democracy is paramount to a free country and censorship is the tool of a dictatorship.

AnonymousAnonymous December 21st, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

this makes me sooo mad.

So he is basically saying this will only affect innadvertent users, people who are innocent who have accidentally gone to a site, these people will then have their traffic logged and guilty till proven innocent, excellent. So where do I buy my lighter fluid and RC books to get the burning going.
Conroy is an IT illiterate, I have been in IT 10 years, managing proxies for about 8 of that. They are fine for businesses looking to reduce costs, leaving the idea their that if a user wants to look at something blocked they can do it from home. This removes a lot of this, gay's, and straight people who simply want to look at porn, or sexually explicit articles, pro-abortionists, anti-abortionists all will have their right to access information blocked. Fine block this at work, it is not appropriate, but what you do in your own home if it harms no one else so-be-it.
If this doesn't actually catch the crooks, only the innadvertent users it is a waste of money. I will protest this decision for the rest of my life, but I am technical enough to easily get around it, my concern is the users who can't, and can't access legal information that is simply RC due to the workload the classifiers will have.
Let me also say I have children, and I would prefer they innadvertently went to a hundred RC sites than couldn't learn something due to a single blocked site. I viewed my first RC material at age 7, and I don't think there is anything wrong with me, I am not into animals or kids. I am married, with kids, and pay a fair whack of taxes, yet I already know some of the sites I visit from my home will be blocked, some of these are related to my IT security job, some I find amusing, removing these sites will affect my job, and affect my leisure time, how about we ban the violent, incest ridden bible, or the violent and pedophelic Koran, or the violent and disturbing Torah, or sexual Sutra's and denying Smritis and Shrutis.
If it was only the abhorent child porn, beastiality etc I would be fine, but you are a fool to think it will be.

AnonymousAnonymous December 22nd, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Conroy's filter foolishness

What a big waste of public money and public time. With so many things wrong in this country, why the hell does this govt waste time pandering to the church and people too lazy to get off their backsides and manage their own children appropriately?

If the govt really want to stop child porn, then prosecute the perps, the people who make the content. Also, when there is no longer access to the IT illiterate paedophiles, no doubt they'll stop with the virtual CPorn and move on to the real thing. How is that a good thing for Australia?

The filter is Orwellian in the extreme, more obnoxious than "children overboard" and the worst piece of legislation since the "terra nullius" declaration during the white invasion. Hope you are proud Conroy!

SimonSimon December 22nd, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

used car salesmen look good

How can anybody take Conroy seriously, even within his own party?

Apart from his palpable ignorance about his portfolio area, he artfully claims there won't be many sites on his secret censorship list - at the same time as he is inviting every single-issue fundamentalist to come up with more things for him to ban.

He is an embarrassment to the Labor Party, and should resign or be sacked now.

AnonymousAnonymous December 22nd, 2009
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)
Add your opinion

In order to post a comment, you need to be registered. (Sign In or register below)

Post your comment

ZDNet Australia Live

A user from Sydney measured 1662kbps @ Broadband Speedtest.

3 minutes ago, Click here to find out how fast your internet speed is.

: Facebook reacts to Greenpeace anticoal campaign - ZDNet Asia http://ping.fm/O3Qce http://bit.ly/9LQvOm

Alliances, Referrals, Kickbacks, Reselling ââ¬â Whereââ¬â¢s the independent advice in this? http://tinyurl.com/37668uq

ZDNET: Alliances, Referrals, Kickbacks, Reselling ââ¬â Whereââ¬â¢s the independent advice in this? http://zd.net/9oglyr

ZDNet: Alliances, Referrals, Kickbacks, Reselling ââ¬â Whereââ¬â¢s the independent advice in ... http://zd.net/9oglyr via themacoylife.tk

I did have one of these in my classroom when I was growing up (back in the 80s). I used one of these in the late '80s at Uni - it wa...

28 minutes ago by dlinker on Microsoft MultiPoint Server 2010

Windsor's foot firmly in Labor's NBN camp: ... on a revision to its widely used... http://bit.ly/9tGvo3 Bill Kutik... http://bit.ly/aAerv1

2-AutoBlog* The tech keeping Plastiki afloat - ZDNet Asia. http://bit.ly/9jAMuG

#Google reaches Buzz settlement: [#zdnet.com.au] as I've previously wr... http://bit.ly/anw9d3 #Software UN #exec:... http://dlvr.it/4mkfx

Google reaches Buzz settlement: A price has been put on Google's mistakes surrounding the launch of Google Buzz: U... http://bit.ly/c5CxnC

Mobile Application World를 이끄는 글로벌 리더들 CVISION에 모인다. http://is.gd/eWU55

RT @stilgherrian: New "Patch Monday" podcast at @zdnetaustralia: "Parliament's poor porn probe exposed" inc @mspecht http://bit.ly/9cHZrY

A fantastic SEO for Firefox Plugin to extend your SEO/PPC efforts beyond the first step http://bit.ly/9qu5OJ

Microsoft MultiPoint Server 2010 - ZDNet Australia: All over the world, schools are facing the same challenge: bri... http://bit.ly/cKnC8w

Microsoft MultiPoint Server 2010 - ZDNet Australia: All over the world, schools are facing the same challenge: bri... http://bit.ly/aDXHyr

Bill Kutik on HR Collaboration Options: By Oliver Marks | September 5, 2010, 6:02pm PDT A recording of a Skype con... http://bit.ly/aMVWqP

@AndrewPalozzo There's TwistedWire and a new one coming soon, hopefully. RSS feeds all on the ZDNet site.

CIOs speak: is in-house IT dying? - ZDNet Australia http://bit.ly/bQVKrP

Google reaches Buzz settlement http://zdnet.com.au/339305800/

Windsor's foot firmly in Labor's NBN camp http://zdnet.com.au/339305806/

RT @BPMcloud: CIOs speak: is in-house IT dying? - ZDNet Australia http://bit.ly/bQVKrP

@joshgnosis Sweet thanks!! Do ZDNet do any other podcast I should be listening too? I love local Aus Tech Podcast

I'm pretty sure what the gov has done there is an invasion of privacy and illegal .. akin to phone tapping really ..

1 hour ago by matiu on Porn jokes are great, data retention is not

@AndrewPalozzo This one should be it. :) http://www.zdnet.com.au/blogs/patch-monday/rss.xml

SD revamp to triple flash card speeds in 2012: The SD Card Association is working on a revision to its widely used... http://bit.ly/9tGvo3

Bill Kutik on HR Collaboration Options: A recording of a Skype conversation with Bill Kutik, the eminent independe... http://bit.ly/dBVJBI

RT @stilgherrian: New "Patch Monday" podcast at @zdnetaustralia: "Parliament's poor porn probe exposed" inc @mspecht http://bit.ly/9cHZrY

Not much point in siding with the mad monk when you consider the senate will be controlled by the Greens. Which one of all those imaginar...

2 hours ago by grump3 on No broadband in Katter country

Hi Krishg,
We'll certainly look into that.

-Luke Hopewell
Journalist | ZDNet Australia

2 hours ago by LHopewell on CIOs speak: is in-house IT dying?

Interesting options for innovation with start ups http://zdnet.com.au/339305787/ - thanks @jensbutler

Oracle picking up HP ex-CEO?: Mark Hurd, who resigned as Hewlett Packard's chief executive officer last month afte... http://bit.ly/9w5RNp

RT: @zdnetaustralia: Like all sheep that follow a flock, Internode is now offering 1TB broadband http://bit.ly/bQJ8rl

CIOs speak: is in-house IT dying? http://bit.ly/9VfrKa

Hi.. It would be interesting to see the similar CIO feedback on Cloud computing from Australian CIOs.. Kindly reply if it was done...

3 hours ago by krishg on CIOs speak: is in-house IT dying?

Woohoo. Can finally opt out of getting useless phone books. http://bit.ly/afCYZS

New Sensis site stops directory deliveries - Business - News - http://bit.ly/bm6pne

The National Broadband Network is not a waste of money, the NBN is design to bring the following: At the moment, people are paying at le...

6 hours ago by myvistahosting.com.au on Coalition to sell off NBN

"NBN Co will have no competitive reason to provide competitive products for retail providers," - what competitive policy did Tels...

7 hours ago by Rex Alfie on Conroy ignored industry on NBN: Slattery

ZDNet Patch Monday Podcast - BYO computers: cloud security risk?: http://bit.ly/9um1Kf

Dear Sir .
I'm from Jordan ,how can i get help to begin waste idustry ,rotating to helpfull peaple in Jordan .

16 hours ago by chiefeditor on Australia's giant e-waste recycling centre: Photos

Keep your damned religion out of this.

17 hours ago by Hyperion on No broadband in Katter country

Amongst the tirade of debate from the industry and political rhetoric coming about this topic it is difficult to establish who is being o...

19 hours ago by cut the bs on Conroy ignored industry on NBN: Slattery

Really, Mr. Linton has a very good point, ordinary Australian Folks Hardware in PC and most of Laptop in the Down_Under corner are no mat...

22 hours ago by NBN Money Pit on 1Gbps NBN fans 'just plain stupid': Linton

Anyone care to explain why I get wildly different line speed results from two different browsers taken within minutes of each other. Note...

1 day ago by Richarmster on Broadband Speedtest

RT @lisadawley: A new toolkit for the new entrepreneur http://zdnet.com.au/339305787/

Samsung's iPad rival set for Christmas http://zdnet.com.au/339305780/

My ADSL2+ modem-router is not IPV6 capable. I suspect 90% of the world's home internet users are in the same boat. I was shocked to...

1 day ago by Yoda7 on The internet is full, what now?

It's not clear who the staff who resigned were. Were they end users or IT staff.

1 day ago by AnanthaP on Indian admins love Linux, stuck on Windows

NBN key to open government: Lundy http://bit.ly/bLXpJF

Well. Just dont buy the phone after 30 sep unless the problems has been fixed. Simple as that.

1 day ago by Vaughan H on Free cases for first Aussie iPhone 4 owners

#NBN... not so back of the envelope. http://www.zdnet.com.au/43bn-nbn-not-so-back-of-the-envelope-339302911.htm #ausvotes

/.をさらっていて見つけた。おもしろいかも。http://www.zdnet.com.au/hackers-accidentally-give-microsoft-their-code-339305548.htm

http://fb.me/HExR6QZn

A new toolkit for the new entrepreneur - bootstrappr - Blogs http://t.co/jqZlAS0

Hackers accidentally give Microsoft their code - Security - News http://bit.ly/a28lVL

This story has been liked 5 times in the last 24 hours!

The internet is full, what now? http://bit.ly/cwmFyf

Apple unveils revamped iPod Touch http://zdnet.com.au/22512823v/

RT @Thombo84: Hacker senden versehentlich Schadcode an MS http://tinyurl.com/2fst5fo

"ANZ: Apple the place to be for security Business News" http://bit.ly/b52JtI

41000 de laptop-uri toshiba cu probleme Toshiba http://bit.ly/aAr9a6 (bine ca au fabrica in china) :P

New Sensis site stops directory deliveries: Sensis has this week given Aussies the ability to opt-out of receiving... http://bit.ly/cchUBK

"Porn jokes are great, data retention is not" - ZDNet http://tinyurl.com/2auvs7a #ozlog #openinternet

'Hurt Locker' pirates get subpoenaed - ZDNet Australia http://bit.ly/b2NEBk

This story has been liked 5 times in the last 24 hours!

This story has been liked 5 times in the last 24 hours!

1) Telstra BigPond45 plans 4%
2) Optus73 plans 9%
3) 39 plans 1%
4) Netspace23 plans 1%
5) iiNet31 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband

CBS - ZDNET Australia Partner Services