Conroy calls for piracy code of conduct

In the wake of iiNet's recent court win, Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy Stephen Conroy has said that he wants the film and internet industries to sit down and try and work out a code of conduct to prevent pirating of copyrighted works rather than working towards legislation changes.

"I would hope to encourage the [internet service providers] and the movie industries to sit down and try and come up with a code of conduct and let's see where that goes before we start leaping off down that path," he told the ABC's Hungry Beast program on Friday.

"I think that a mature approach by both the movie industry and the internet industry sitting down, having a conversation, and coming up with a code of practice is the absolute preferable outcome. The problem is at the moment in Australia there is no agreement, there is no discussion, there is no dialogue and people resorted to court," he said.

His comments followed Thursday's decision by NSW Federal Court Judge Justice Dennis Cowdroy that internet service provider (ISP) iiNet did not authorise copyright infringement allegedly occurring on its network, as had been claimed by a consortium of film and television players, represented by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT).

"I think it's always disappointing when situations like this end up in court in the first place," Conroy said.

He pointed out that it was a worldwide battle, with other countries such as the UK and France talking about introducing relevant laws. "In Australia, unfortunately, because of a refusal to hold a dialogue — and I've been trying for two years to encourage the sectors to have a dialogue — they've got themselves into a court battle of which there was a decisive outcome in favour of iiNet and the ISPs," the minister said.

"But what I would still hope is that we can bring them together to sit down and settle their differences [and] create a code of practice that actually protects both parties."

The Sydney Morning Herald previously reported a spokesperson for the minister saying the government was considering a "three strikes" rule — if a user infringes copyright three times they would be cut off by an internet service provider — depending on the outcome of the trial.

Talkback

Looks like the pollies are starting to learn

Looks like the pollies are starting to learn - legislation against the overwhelming majority of the population - at least the population under 40 is a big lose for them.

So they'll take the easy way out and let the parties work it out themselves.

AnonymousAnonymous February 7th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Waste of time

What is there for the copypigs and the ISPs to talk about? The only possible solution is that mandated by law throughout modern history: If you accuse someone of a crime, you have to summons them and prove it beyond reasonable doubt in front of a judge, guilty or not guilty. Anything else is an abridgement of due process and human rights.

The only reason the copypigs want to short-circuit the usual legal process is because they lack the resources and time to prosecute the entire population, which is what they're dealing with. So this is nothing more than terrorism in its purest form - terrorise an entire nation into obedience by trial-less mass persecution. The fact is, if the entire population is ignoring the law, then the law is an ****
And in the end, people filesharing copyrighted material over the internet isn't the ISPs' problem. End of discussion.

MystikanMystikan February 7th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Some Big Media Companies Are Really Stupid!

The bandwidth charges for a Movie download are greater than DVD rental charges. If DVD's were in a single open standard format (rather than over 100 inconsistent proprietary ones) no one would bother with downloading.

Second, there are a multitude of technical means to stop 99 percent of illegal downloads. When AFACT or some big company pays me to tell how to do this then I'll tell them. Right now they seem content to waste their money on lawyers.

Richard A. Marschall, Ph.D.Richard A. Marschall, Ph.D. February 7th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Re: Some Big Media Companies Are Really Stupid!

And for every one of those technical means, Dr. Richard, there's a technical workaround... or a cost-benefit threshold. Most ISP's are struggling to keep up with throughput demands, you think they're going to turn the bandwidth-shaping boxes up to 11, or set up constant packet-sniffing on their core links? If they somehow did convince ISP's to shoot themselves in the foot, people would go back to ripping DVD's.

Many see file-sharing as a necessary evil. They perpetuate this crime with the intention of breaking the backs of some of history's most fallacious, avaricious and reprehensible self-serving industries with laughably out-dated business models... companies that misrepresent their role and the degree to which all profits and losses are passed to the artists on whose behalf they claim to speak. Funny enough, their actions also fit the informal definition of the word "piracy".

AnonymousAnonymous February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

why?

As if the studios are going to negotiate with ISPs.

They expect their customers to simply bend over and get what the studios want to give them, how they want to give it to them and for whatever price they feel like charging. They are certainly not interested in a 3rd parties point of view.

xBeaniexBeanie February 7th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

If only...

If only this guy spends as much time further developing the ICT industry as opposed to focusing on things like this.

Shouldn't this be the responsibility of the Minister of Arts? lol... since when do record companies belong to ICT?

DaveDave February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

RE:

Only because they're talking about digital works/media. Movies contain alot more computer editing than real acting nowadays anyway

Thomas SimmonsThomas Simmons February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

AFACT will always represent the evil side

AFACT is evil and it's only a mater of time before Conroy does something stupid like adapt a three strikes policy. Which I garrantee would be his last as it would be the last straw for the IT community who are already very much upset with his arrogant ways. My concern is AFACT wont go away until they either get what they want or someone makes a firm policy over who is responsible for what and they sure arent doing things in the publics interest. More like a Mafia representative.

AnonymousAnonymous February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

FINALLY!

A judge has handed down a final ruling, and that's not good enough for Conroy, no , he still thinks "its the fault of the ISP" and that the ISP has to wipe the collective behind of the movie industry for them. SC deserved to be taken out the back, stripped of his rights to politics, and handed a job flipping burgers at McDonalds, because maybe there he will not DESTROY the ISP industry in Australia.

AnonymousAnonymous February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Re: FINALLY!

Unfortunately, it is not finished yet.
Even if the reaction of Conroy indicates an admission of incompetence, he's still persisting in the (sanctioned by a court as wrong) idea that it is the **ISPs** that need to do something to stop... whatever AFACT wants to stop.

AnonymousAnonymous February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Re Finally !

Hey Go easy ! I would'nt want nay hamburgers I may wish to purchase ruined as well....

Burgerlover possiblyBurgerlover possibly February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Dialog? Really?

First: hollywood had a *record breaking year* and you're trying to claim "damages" due to piracy?
Second: How on earth can there be :loss due to piracy" when *so much* content is *simply not available for purchase*? The region coding practices and distribution deals mean that *lots* of content simply cannot be purchased here in australia, either in a store of even purchased online and shipped here. And then to add insult to injury, the intire music/movie industry is flat out *refusing* to make (he overwhelmingly vast majority of) that content available for legitimate purchase online in digital format. You'd have to be *INSANE* to think this is a "dialog" problem, it is a MONOLOGUE problem - and the MONOLOGUE is The Music/Movie industry saying "we refuse to do anything to change our current business model, we insist that anything sold DIGITALLY is illegal and we refuse to embrace new technology".

AnonymousAnonymous February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Spot on

Spot on, anonymous. How many times have I been looking to purchase something legally only to be confronted with a message telling my I can't buy it because i'm in Australia. I google the song and find an itunes link to purchase it - hold on, it's the US Apple store - i get redirected to the Aussie store that doesn't sell the track i'm after. What now? I find it as a torrent and I still end up with my song. Can't say I didn't try to do the right thing.

AnonymousAnonymous February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Location discrimination

Besides the issues with purchasing content, much content is available to view free, if you live in the right place. How is it viable for the industry to 'give away' content in return for advertising revenue, and expect others to purchase (if possible!) the same content.

AnonymousAnonymous February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Agree!

Not to mention the ridiculous time difference between shows released overseas and here in Australia.

Dr Who was aired on Christmas Eve in the UK on the BBC, and available on torrents the next day.

It's not being shown on the ABC until mid Feb here.

This type of thing is inexcusable in this day and age!

We can grab things immediately online so why should we be forced to adhere to their ridiculous timeframes governed by nothing but arbitrary "ratings" periods and the like.

The media industry needs to recognise consumers are working on a completely different level to how we were just 15 years ago, and need to stop fighting us, forcing us into the consumers they want us to be, and instead work towards selling to us as the consumers we are.

Funky JFunky J February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Start

How about we start with the content industry providing content people want in a format people want and at a reasonable cost.

Until that happens, fighting piracy is pointless.

I, among many others, would be happy to pay $10 bucks for a movie. But only if I had control of the file and had the right to watch it on any device or in any format that I please.

When something like this is offered as an alternative, the content industry has no case against anyone, ISPs or regular people.

AnonymousAnonymous February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

piracy code of conduct

We already have a "piracy code of conduct" it's called The Law. ISPs should not be conducting vigilante operations at the whim of private enterprises. If copyright holders wish to stop a user from file-sharing they must take that user to court and deal with them under the judicial oversight of the courts.

That is how a civilised society operates, why does Conroy think that private corporations should be allowed to punish citizens under their own pseudo-legal system?

Dan BuzzardDan Buzzard February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Everyone has said it but I'll say it too

Conroy has a seemingly feeble grasp on the scope of his portfolio and a seemingly feeble capacity for reason. If the movie industry wants to reduce illegal downloads all they have to do is provide legal ones. ISPs and "the movie industry" have nothing to talk about. Thats it.

AnonymousAnonymous February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Ill say something different

My guess is Conroy has a pretty good understanding of his portfolio and is merely stalling for time. Remember we are involved in secret negotiations for an international copyright treaty which I am sure will have all sorts of draconion provisions if we dont bow low enough to our US masters. Why would Conroy want to shoot himself in the foot by legislating now when he can just wait for Australia to be -brought into line- with international standards as we are collectively sold out in the treaty.

BruceBruce February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Why load this responsibility onto ISPs?

It should be just as it is with telephone or snail mail in that a delivery service is provided and they are not made to ensure the legality of the content.

Leave the copyright protection aspects to the suppliers or sellers (who make such downloads available from their sites). Just how stupid is Conroy and has he got any qualifications for his job?. I tend to doubt that he has after the idiotic Internet Filter idea.

Wayne FitzSimonsWayne FitzSimons February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

CONroy is clueless!

He can't even catch on to the fact that he is totally out of his depth.

He wants to legislate ISP monitoring and blocking of "adult" material and now he thinks IAPs are going to voluntarily shaft themselves over filesharing?

How are ISPs supposed to identify legitimate digital downloads from "stolen" ones? For Christmas Blondie.net released a FREE version of "We Three Kings" which went viral. Much to the chagrin of the musicopoly, it topped playlists all over the world (esp. in the UK).

Now, of course, Blondie fen are hoping that there will be a more polished version of the song on the forth-coming album.

This is a band that learned the hard way. All their early stuff, "Heart of Glass" etc., is OWNED by EMI. If you want to cover one of these songs you have to fight with ARIA and APRA to get permission, and the band members get SFA.

Everything since the release of "No Exit" is owned by a Private company controlled by the band, and LEASED to SONY BMG. If you want to cover one of these more recent songs you deal directly with Dick Johnson Songs.

The day that the Arctic Monkeys made it big BECAUSE of file-sharing was the death-knell for the musicopoly.

MicMic February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Media companies should adapt

As long as it is easier to pirate that to get legitimate software people will continue downloading media and other software illegally.

The music industry seems to be slowly catching up with apps like spotify a online music stores but where is that for films? Where is Australia's www.hulu.com??

Stop limiting people who want to pay for media!

RichardRichard February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Stop the cost shift

I am not a pirate, but I already am paying when I purchase a blank discs, because those poor and penniless video studios, who are making $2000000000 per decent film. It is time for the government to stop this cost shift from the multibillion dollars corporations onto me. I do not care what they decide, but I am not a multibillion dollars person. My salary is quite limited and if studios think somebody is infringing their rights, they should sue them, not ask me to foot the bill. I do not care if all pirates go to jail. Bugger them, but I should not pay studios theirs loses if I did not cause them. STOP FORCING ME TO PAY FOR SOMEBODY’S ELSE CRIME. It is as simple as that. That was the reason I was against this lawsuit. Not because I like prates. As far as I am concerned, they all should go to jail, but because this was an attempt to shift the cost of fighting the piracy from the studio to iiNET customers. Studios should sue pirates and ask for the costs, not burden internet users. I do not care about them, as much as they do not care about me.

AnonymousAnonymous February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

haha Conroy is one funny guy

As has already been ruled in the court case, the ISP is only a carriage for the service.

After this ruling why would the ISP feel they should talk to the AFACT?

Certain won't get any co-operation from iinet..

ABAB February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Give up, really...

To be quite honest, I think there is an overexagerration of what is actually lost due to copyright infringement/Theft.

Movies would be my first example yeah they lose millions... out of the BILLIONS they do make

Same with software, Billions is made and an amount so much smaller than that is lost its almost redundant to even bother working against it. Its just corporate greed and these people need to get over the fact that if they make something and out it on the net it WILL be stolen.

Personally, I think Conroy can stuck his anti-Copyright whining where it counts. At least now he might think again about mandatory internet filtering, and again on that don't bother emailing him to voice your opinion, He has a PDF ready to fire off to anyone and everyone who opposes the issue...

Thomas SimmonsThomas Simmons February 8th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Subscription services - everyone wins

I subscribe to a music subscription service and I love it. Vast amounts of music available, all legal, everyone gets paid. Nokia Music, which is sadly closing down next month, was my music provider and at $10/month was a bargain. (music.nokia.com.au)

Surely a subscription model is the best answer for all parties, for both videos and music? It means having a PC connected to your sound and/or video system but this isn't rocket science.

Due to AFACT's bullying of iiNet, I will never ever again buy a CD or DVD for myself. Ever.

Time for the media companies to update their business model(s).

S CollinsS Collins February 10th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Great comment SC!!!

AFACT should wake up to themselves and look at positive ways of increasing sales, but giving consumers like yourselves what they want - in the form of subscription services and the like.

BBBB February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

simple

Its real simple. People will pay for convenience. Downloading is not that simple for non-tech heads and can take a long time to find and download what you want. Media companies can provide the same thing a lot quicker and easier but no, they prefer to bundle everything with crap no one wants (e.g. albums, "bonus" disks) and enforce draconian DRM measures that only cause trouble for the legit customers.

I always remember buying a DVD for the kids and it had a 15 minute preview that it forced you to watch every time - no option to skip or fast forward. That got pretty tired pretty quickly. This is what happens when companies think you should just accept what crap they want to dish out.

xBeaniexBeanie February 12th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)
Add your opinion

In order to post a comment, you need to be registered. (Sign In or register below)

Post your comment

ZDNet Australia Live

A user from Melbourne measured 509kbps @ Broadband Speedtest.

4 minutes ago, Click here to find out how fast your internet speed is.

RT @seesmic: Seesmic listed by @ZDNet - Top 25 Android apps: The best of the best http://ping.fm/goi9K

@Justin_Bartak Thanks for all the RTs! Taking a look at the guts inside Apple's new Magic Trackpad - http://bit.ly/a4OBFm #Minneapolis #Mac

RT @seesmic: Seesmic listed by @ZDNet - Top 25 Android apps: The best of the best http://ping.fm/goi9K

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit: Intel today won a key ruling in an antitr... http://bit.ly/9yAlXu #mobile #apps

Sigh. RT @TechZader: Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 marketing pitch: 'I'm a phone too' http://bit.ly/cxedPj

For the iPad that has everything http://bit.ly/9EJLFz

유용한 안드로이드 어플 추천 RT@ZDNet - Top 25 Android apps: The best of the best http://ping.fm/goi9K

RT @ZDNet Microsoft: We are focusing on eight core businesses http://zd.net/ajzANC

David, you've completely missed the point. This has nothing to do with consumer value. You mentioned that "Telstra is supposed...

9 minutes ago by M.N.M on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

not sure about marketing.. "I'm a phone too": by @maryjofoley: http://bit.ly/ayVAmg

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit - ZDNet (blog) http://bit.ly/b4FjzF

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit: Intel today won a key ruling in an antitrust case when... http://bit.ly/9yAlXu

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit: Intel today won a key ruling in an antitrust case when... http://bit.ly/cDwY4t

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit: Intel today won a key ruling in an antitrust case when... http://bit.ly/9yAlXu

When online communities go to work http://bit.ly/bAaip0

Top 25 Android apps: The best of the best | ZDNet http://m.zdnet.com/blog/btl/top-25-android-apps-the-best-of-the-best/37363

Why Facebook is better than Quora...or is it? - ZDNet (blog) http://bit.ly/csQ2Gq

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit http://bit.ly/bZUp31

For the iPad that has everything http://bit.ly/9EJLFz

Microsoft's Ballmer: Windows 7 slates are 'job number one': One of the most pressing questions on investors' and s... http://bit.ly/cyqr98

Microsoft's Ballmer: Windows 7 slates are 'job number one': One of the most pressing questions on investors' and s... http://bit.ly/cyqr98

Yup! They're pretty and look real nice but, as one who qualified in 1963 - on a Diesel Boat - and retired in 1982 - after 6 more die...

12 minutes ago by willyjon on Get wet with submarine tech photos

Microsoft: We are focusing on eight core businesses (Mary Jo Foley/All about Microsoft Blog) http://bit.ly/bPYRff

BlackBerry encryption 'too secure': National security vs. consumer privacy | ZDNet http://ow.ly/1qMcw3 #privacy #p2#tlot #aynrand #tlot

Ken Turner (footballer) : Steve Ballmer: Microsoft has been focusing on cloud for 15 years - ZDNet (blog) http://bit.ly/b21h6z

Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 marketing pitch: 'I'm a phone too' http://bit.ly/cxedPj

Dell's Alienware makes a big splash in Bangalore with gaming cafe http://bit.ly/aGUEXE

MasterChefs launch iPhone 4 in Sydney - http://dld.bz/prSR I really want 1, would you get 1? http://dld.bz/prSS

"Not greatly dissimilar to the public jubilation felt at the end of the second World War, Sydney-siders ..." http://bit.ly/cTvyuB #reallysad

Hilarious coverage of the iPhone 4 launch from the CNET guys. http://bit.ly/cTvyuB

What a sad way to live if the only joy in your life is to queue for a piece of defective technology sold by a vendor who accused his loya...

2 hours ago by fred9999 on iPhone 4 Australian launch: pictures

@Jetttje: outlook-alternatieven: http://www.zdnet.com.au/top-alternatives-to-microsoft-outlook-339295046.htm

RT @NASAWatch: NASA photos mooned in abandoned Maccas (LOIRP) http://bit.ly/arFI4Y

http://bit.ly/9y8rsU Multimedia Toolbar Icons - Free Software Downloads - ZDNet Australia

I am happy to know I was right about predicting Symantec's stock price and the furture trend. As I have pointed out a few times, I th...

7 hours ago by strelaoz on iPhone midnight launches across Australia

Just weirdly found out Michael Yell - Country and Regional Director for OEM, XSP and Services Business at Symantec Asia Pacific and Japan...

7 hours ago by strelaoz on iPhone midnight launches across Australia

As I have reported to Symantec Ethics about David Freer’s (VP, Symantec – Norton, APJ) misconducts (fraud, having dissented sex with ...

7 hours ago by strelaoz on iPhone midnight launches across Australia

David Freer (VP, Symantec Consumer Business Units - Norton, APJ) is a BIG LIAR! He lied to me for more than two and half years for my tru...

7 hours ago by strelaoz on iPhone midnight launches across Australia

My speed is 33 807 I'm with bigpond cable

9 hours ago by francoo on Broadband Speedtest

That is a beautiful boat,but, I'd still rather go to sea on a first flight 688 boat.Preferably the 689 if Clinton hadn't decommis...

9 hours ago by rogue689 on Get wet with submarine tech photos

For many other reasons, than just the net filter, the current has to go. Still, I wouldn't trust Abbot either. There are however chec...

10 hours ago by ian_from_oz on Conroy's filter masterstroke

RT: @zdnetaustralia: http://bit.ly/cJU6Mf We've added Virgin to our iPhone 4 pricing table comparison.. See which telco has the best deal.

The pick: five business iPad apps http://fb.me/DOid8NXt

Apple to look at iPhone 3G iOS 4 problems - Software - News http://bit.ly/cmaTAJ _ that's nice of them

Stop trying to dodge the filter issue, Conboy; it'll bite you in the **** whether you like it or not.

13 hours ago by Hyperion on Conroy pledges NBN map, same policies

@merejames http://bit.ly/9YJ6e7

Facebook va lansa un serviciu de răspunsuri la întrebările utilizatorilor http://bit.ly/aS4kLC

Survey proves #AUS e-health demand http://j.mp/ah9Iwf /via @ZDNetAustralia

A "profound cultural change" is required for a truly open government http://bit.ly/bTht86 /via @zdnetaustralia #gov2au

As one who has been as critical as any of the Sol era Telstra...as long as Telstra are leaving feasible room for profit margins for their...

15 hours ago by RS on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

David, while the popular opinion, at least in the eyes of Telstra opponents, is to use every devious argument to stifle the operations of...

15 hours ago by sydneyla on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

Question two: What is stopping.... "AUSTRALIANS could save up to $1.9 billion a year in travel costs, petrol and time if they spent h...

15 hours ago by Vasso Massonic on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

Survey proves e-health demand: NEHTA http://itrau.com/bt9f8w via @ZDNetAustralia

David, please elaborate on Telstra's response, stating competitors could gain network access for "as Little as $2.50 a month...

15 hours ago by Vasso Massonic on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

RT @zdnetaustralia: Survey by NEHTA proves there is a demand for e-health http://bit.ly/bXuT1K

RT @zdnetaustralia: Telstra cops $18.55 million fine for exchange capping http://bit.ly/9cL91V

RT @zdnetaustralia: Survey by NEHTA proves there is a demand for e-health http://bit.ly/bXuT1K #yam

A good read..RT @zdnetaustralia: Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog? http://bit.ly/cSgC31

RT @zdnetaustralia: eBay and the Trading Post online help the Australian Taxation Office catch tax cheats http://bit.ly/dBDXRz

RT @zdnetaustralia Tesltra tweaks its data plans for all smartphones (not just the iPhone 4) http://bit.ly/bxO0G2

RT @zdnetaustralia: Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog? http://bit.ly/cSgC31

Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog? http://bit.ly/cSgC31

@mibus http://www.zdnet.com.au/commbank-dives-into-580m-banking-it-revamp-339288467.htm

The tech keeping Plastiki afloat: photos: ZDNet Australia brings you the tech below deck on the epic Plastiki voyage. http://bit.ly/aTj1QU

http://bit.ly/cJU6Mf We've added virgin to our iPhone 4 pricing table comparison.. See which telco has the best deal.

This story has been liked 5 times in the last 24 hours!

1) Telstra BigPond37 plans 1%
2) Optus76 plans 2%
3) 39 plans 1%
4) Virgin Mobile7 plans 4%
5) Netspace36 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband

CBS - ZDNET Australia Partner Services