Upwardly Mobile by Jo Best

In Upwardly Mobile, chief reporter Jo Best gives you her perspective on how mobile and wireless innovations from around the world will affect Australia.

Helen Coonan's fact hunt

Posted by Jo Best @ 16:22 12 comments

In the broadband war, it seems, everyone has an opinion and those with a vested interest are playing fast and loose with the truth.

Been enjoying the to-ing and fro-ing about the government's planned WiMax network? The 'can you cook your meat pies while you use the Internet' stoush? The topographical fisticuffs? The installation costs that seemed to drop AU$750 overnight?

Facts have become somewhat of a commodity in the WiMax discussion. First and worst offender: the government, of course.

While I can't claim to be an authority on how WiMax performs on range and bandwidth -- who can? -- some of the government's so-called facts about where the technology is being rolled out immediately rung alarm bells.

Senator Helen Coonan has been proclaiming that "the US, Canada, Denmark, Austria, South Africa, the UK and India" are all using WiMax for high speed broadband. As a native of the UK, the claims about that particular country had me scratching my head.

One newspaper even went a step farther, saying "British Telecom has chosen WiMAX standard technology". This is bending the truth to breaking point. It is not rolling out the technology currently and a BT exec told journalists recently that the telco had not even made up its mind whether to bid for spectrum when it became available and had no definite plans to deploy WiMax in the future.

Yes, it has trialled the standard and is a member of the WiMax Forum but it is not a WiMax provider. Saying BT is rolling out WiMax is a little like saying Bill Clinton is a stoner when he admitted "I smoked but I didn't inhale".

The UK does have a WiMax network in the form of provider Pipex Wireless, but it is still in its infancy, with real-world deployments only running in two small towns. Parallels can't be drawn with what Australia plans to do with the technology and those who are drawing them are lulling the electorate into a false sense of security.

And the US, Ms Coonan? Let's delve a little deeper. Yes, the operator Sprint is planning a massive deployment -- but that's all it is, a plan, not yet a full rollout. No customers are using it, no data cards bothering the bandwidth. There are questions hanging over funding and roaming among other niggles (a distinct lack of handsets, for a start) but those issues don't ever seem to figure in the sepia-tinted WiMax world the government lives in.

I am not criticising WiMax as a technology, by any means, merely the elastic "facts" that have been bandied around by those both for and against its deployment. No one has yet rolled out WiMax in the scale that Australia plans to.

As such, it's a gamble. If it's a gamble that will pay off, those involved need to be a little more truthful with their users.

Talkback 12 comments

    Suckers Carol Rae -- 29/06/07

    One thousand million dollars to gain a handful of votes at the next election seems a good deal to Mr.Howard.

    Funds not for votes Jason Torrento -- 29/06/07 (in reply to #320081871)

    Let's get it straight Carol.

    While you might have a vested interested in this debate, I think the "facts" being spread are severely distorted.

    What you WILL find is this has been on the drawing board for a while.

    You'll also find that it's going ahead regardless of the election result.

    And you'll further find that this was all arranged prior to even the election becoming an issue.

    This isn't a "Telstra Shareholder issue", this isn't a "Election" issue, no matter how hard Telstra and it's scraps site tries to make it one.

    It's a issue of sorting out a Federal Government stuff up, that is, privatising a once government funding with its monopoly infrastructure, instead of having the foresight to split it.

    So, now, they have indeed come to a fix for that, with the funding measures taken, they are able to provide competition in regional and rural areas in the FIXED BROADBAND market, and that is essentially the point of the program, which it will fulfill successfully, even if WiMAX, if deployed, turns out to be a poor choice, as the technology is upgradeable, and the towers being "up", is the key infrastructure cost, the technology is considerably cheaper with towers out there, something that isn't generally possible for a retail start up to do by itself, so government funding will make that possible.

    Offensive title Anonymous -- 29/06/07

    ...the title of this blog is a little offensive, don't you think? Censor thyself, ZDNet.

    it took a second... Anonymous -- 29/06/07 (in reply to #320081873)

    hahaha! well spotted to the first Anonymous... :)

    hehe Anonymous -- 12/07/07 (in reply to #320081891)

    Yes, very funny. The truth is out there....

    I dont agree Anonymous -- 29/06/07

    There's billions of dollars on the line here, do you honestly think optus put this at stake, just because they 'heard' wimax was 'cool' and some other countries were using it?

    It would be crazy to even have submitted a bit in the first place without undergoing extensive feasibility studies.

    The arguments in this article about how it's a 'new' technology and it's never been done on this scale before are rediculous. Is there a next g network in the world that remotely comes close to telstras for example?

    Bottom line is that even if this does work half-arsed. Telstra will attack it's reliability and coverage either way.. At the end of the day, it's providing competition, and this means cheaper prices and more choice - which is good.

    Absolutely Anonymous -- 02/07/07 (in reply to #320081879)

    There are many, many 3G networks bigger and better than Telstra's around the world. at least 5 in England, for example, and many more across Europe and Asia. Australia is the poor cousin here.

    A little different scale? Aaron X -- 03/07/07 (in reply to #320081998)

    You could fit all 5 networks in Australia and still not span a 5th of the country. Even with the bits that don't have coverage in Australia, I'm pretty sure that Telstra's is the biggest.
    (UK 244,820 sq km - Aus 7,741,220 sq km)

    As for the article, I agree that the issue will be with devices/handsets to run. At present I think there is only a handful of card manufacturers for existing technology (3GSM, EVDO). I think the figures quoted was around the millions mark, thats a lot of devices for any manufaturer to scale up to, AND provide functions such as service and customer support.

    I'm sure the well documented plan the previous comment posters have mentioned will articulate how a range of companies and the government will execute this :)

    Mobile? Jason Torrento -- 29/06/07

    But the point of the network IS NOT mobile handsets.

    It never was intended to be for a MOBILE HANDSET network.

    Why on earth do they draw conclusions that a tower is going up, it must provide mobile access?

    More importantly, Australia Connected is about FIXED broadband services, why on earth is a mobile journalist even glancing at it when they could be writing about NextG's excessive pricing and its effects on consumers that can't get broadband?

    Oh, Jo just felt she'd jump in on the WiMAX stuff and post a relatively ... useless.. article?

    Well, I suppose there have been worst journalism cases in recent times.

    If only it were mobile... Jo Best -- 02/07/07 (in reply to #320081882)

    This blog is devoted to mobile and wireless innovations, as such, a wireless standard like WiMax is a prime subject.

    And yes, the bush broadband network will not supply mobile access in its current form but if it did -- if OPEL and the government had backed the 802.16e standard rather than 802.16e -- bush users would have benefited even more by having a single network for both fixed and mobile connectivity and Telstra would be facing even greater competition.

    If mobile WiMax had been chosen, it could potentially have helped remedy those issues about Next G pricing and lack of broadband broadband that you mention, Jason.

    Unfortunately, it's a win-win situation that bush broadband users have been deprived of for the moment.

    WIMAX commentary Anonymous -- 29/06/07

    I cant speak for wimax either but if you want to talk to someone who *has* used it in a commercial australian context - not a huge rollout mind you but under aussie conditions - talk to this guy http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=764316&ux=6258

    "10 km's is just fine for WiMAX, the gear being deployed is claimed to have a <i>minimum</i> useful range of 20Km's.

    We have been trialling a WiMAX multipoint system in one of our regional networks, and in our experience we're seeing good results out way beyond 20km's - the OPEL claim in this regard, in my view, appears highly sound.

    ..

    Simon"

    Certainly there ARE a lot of 'facts' halftruths and so forth being spouted by a lot of people. Given this guy is running an ISP with over 100m turnover and knows what hes talking about when it comes to networks, i trust his comments on the technology more than the politicians.

    Is this true Senator Coonan? Carol Rae. -- 30/06/07 (in reply to #320081890)

    Jason.... your suggestion that "this was all arranged prior to even the election becoming an issue" is a statement that needs comment from Senator Coonan. If you are correct, and I do not know if you are, the Howard Government has a lot of explaining to do and this should be looked at by all other competing Telcos.

Add your opinion

Jo Best

Jo Best

News Editor

[+] Read bio

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Tags

Back to top

Featured