Securify This! by Munir Kotadia

A hard look at the latest developments in IT security with a real world perspective.

Citibank helps phishers improve their bait?

Posted by Munir Kotadia @ 14:25 4 comments

It took help from three security experts, Citibank's spokesperson, dozens of e-mails and almost a full working day of investigation to confirm that an e-mail I had seen from Citibank was not actually a clever phishing attempt.

This particular e-mail was sent by Citibank Australia at the end of October to inform customers that its online security system had been revamped so they should visit the Web site and update their log-in credentials.

However, around the same time this legitimate e-mail was being distributed by Citibank, the following phishing attacks were also taking place, according to UK-based phishing archive site MillerSmiles:

  • On October 23, in Indonesia, some people received e-mails telling them about an update to Citibank's security system. It asked them to update their log-in details
  • On October 25, this time in Texas, users received an e-mail saying: "Citibank has changed security screening procedures for online banking, please follow the given instructions in order to comply with our additional security requirements"
  • On October 30, an e-mail that seemed to come from Citibank asked French recipients to confirm their e-mail address
  • On November 4, some users reported an e-mail informing them that Citibank was updating its security systems: "Once you have enrolled in our security upgrade your pending Citibank account transactions will not be interrupted and will continue as normal," the e-mail said.

So how are online banking users supposed to tell the difference between a phishing e-mail and a real e-mail from their bank? Usually, the easiest way is to look for spelling mistakes and bad grammar.

Unfortunately, with the "flawless" e-mail that Citibank sent to Australian customers, fraudsters probably have the best template for future phishing attacks that they could ever hope for.

Phishing is not a new phenomenon and banks are losing more money than ever before because of this activity.

In the UK last week, the Association of Payment Clearing Services (APACS) said that phishing incidents have increased almost 1,500 percent year-on-year and UK banks lost around AU$56 million (22.5 million pounds) in the first six months of the year -- compared with AU$36 million (14.5 million pounds) during the same period last year.

So the problem is not going away.

The Australian Payments Clearing Association (APCA) does not release equivalent figures for the domestic market. However, I would be very surprised if the relative loss per user, or the increase in total losses, are any different.

What should banks do?
According to Neil Campbell, national security practice manager at Dimension Data, they should stop using e-mail altogether.

"In order to reduce the effectiveness of phishing e-mails I believe all banks should refrain from communicating with their customers via e-mail... In this case, Citibank may have been better off communicating this message to users via their Internet banking site either before or after they log on -- preferably after, in my opinion," Campbell said.

Patrik Runald, senior security specialist at antivirus firm F-Secure believes that banks should "think twice" before e-mailing customers and he suggests that maybe more traditional methods of communication should be revisited.

"My bank in Singapore, DBS, is switching from a username/password combo to two-factor authentication and they sent snail mails to all their customers," he said.

"They also promoted it on their ATMs for a few weeks before making the switch.

"It makes much more sense to me to do it this way than sending e-mails," said Runald.

What possessed Citibank to send such an e-mail? Bronwyne Edwards, the consultant who first brought this issue to my attention, probably has the most believable explanation: "It looks to me like a couple of marketing people came up with it after having too much champagne at lunch".

That would do it!

Do you have any ideas how banks can cost-effectively communicate with customers without raising security concerns? I would be very interested in hearing your views (please be sober). E-mail me at munir.kotadia@zdnet.com.au or talkback below.

Talkback 4 comments

    How bank should do it. Anonymous -- 14/11/06

    Bendigo Bank uses a secure email built into your account. After logging on you can see if you have email. It's part of your account, and only allows you to read email from the Bank or send email to the bank. Totally closed system, only between you and the bank. It simple and effective and works.

    Internal Messaging System Anonymous -- 17/11/06

    Now a days almost all banks are introduced a closed integrated messaging system for their account holders. The messages are viewable only when then account holders logged in to their account. If there are any upgrades to their system, they could publish through their websites and branches/ATMs rather than sending emails. And also provide enough time to reach the message to account holders.

    Please help working moter DAMARI STRATFORD -- 22/03/07 (in reply to #320071504)

    Would you post this or may I?
    Please sign our petition at Care2.com--And pray for justice.
    I WILL NOT STOP UNTIL I GET JUSTICE FOR ALL
    Please help us if you can along with the Senator, the letter below were sent to the Senator
    Go to---http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/937399751, then type in “Working mother and Citibank ethics‘ for search .or, www.thepetitionsite.com/
    go to, www.thepetitionsite.com/ http://my.care2.com/dcsbears
    then click on sign a petition
    go to the bottom of the page, click on all petition
    go down to the 'w' and click on Working mother and Citibank ethics
    at the bottom of the petition click on ' sign petition'
    Working mother at Citibank, how did they make the list of the “Best 100 Companies for Working Mothers? Fired for putting daughters needs first? Fired via UPS, 12 days before Christmas?
    Please forward to anyone that could help us, thanks.
    Keep this story going so we can get help. Tell a friend to tell a friend, how else can the little guy fight corporate America?
    Working mother at Citibank, how did they make the list of the “Best 100 Companies for Working Mothers?
    Please forward to anyone that could help us, thanks.
    Keep this story going so we can get help. Tell a friend to tell a friend, how else can the little guy fight corporate America?
    Please help us if you can along with the Senator, this letter was sent to the Senator:
    March 8, 2007
    To: Senator Barbara Boxer
    Also: Jason J Chan,
    1700 Montgomery Street, Suite 240
    San Francisco, Ca.94111
    Dear Senator Barbara Boxer,
    On, 3/7/07, I received a notice from Citigroup, HR Communications Unit in New York, regarding Corporate benefits for January 2007, I have included a copy with this fax to you..
    I am at the point that I feel this is harassment, why, because Citibank fired me on 12/13/05. It is very upsetting to me every time I receive these notices, it is a constant reminded of everything I have lost due to the unfair and unequal treatment of employees by Jeff Ursino and Citibank. I have already been sent my 401K check due to my termination, I am not contributing to this program so why does Citigroup keep harassing me with these notices. Remember that last October, 2006, Citigroup sent me a letter ( 10 months after firing me) thanking me for 5 years of services and looking forward to 5 more years, why, they fired me. I would have made it to 5 years, as I had no plans to leave the company, but I was fired 12 days before Christmas via UPS. That notice was again just another reminded of what could have been and what I have lost. Please ask Citigroup to stop harassing me with these notices for they are very upsetting to me.
    Also, on 3/7/07, I received a letter from your Director of Constituent Services, Eric Jose Vizcaino, regarding a letter I sent you and it states that my concerns are being forwarded to the Director of the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, Suzanne M Ambrose, for her review. Again, Citibank attorneys explained to the DFEH, how and why they fired me and as I pointed out to you in an earlier letter, Citibank lied to them about me calling in on 11/15/05, Citibank states that I called in and said I would be out the rest of the week. Again this is a lie, I worked that day. Sheri Paulo, Employee Relations manager of New York for Citigroup, had told me that they said this due to being miss informed , when I brought this lie up to her attention, she said that they had been given bad information and that they would correct this by sending in another statement to the DFEH, and to my knowledge they never did and instead stand by their lie. I have sent you a copy of my time card for that week and other information regarding their statement to the DFEH. Why does Citibank tell the DFEH that I was fired and Ronan of the US Dept. of Labor that I am still employed. They also told Ronan that they would send me a letter explaining how I am still employed, but I never received this

    Citibank does have internal messaging Anonymous -- 21/11/06

    I happened to be a client of Citibank's and couldn't beleive my eyes to see that email discussed in the article. I was absolutely sure it was a phish. Checking the source I was trying to figure out how the phishers used legitimate domain names to conduct their fraud until I realised that it has really been sent from Citibank.
    I can't agree with the Author that that was the marketing guys job. The idea of mass emailing customers is so silly that it has to come from no less than the A-P President himself.

Add your opinion

Munir Kotadia

Munir Kotadia

Producer

[+] Read bio

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Tags

Back to top

Featured