Securify This! by Munir Kotadia

A hard look at the latest developments in IT security with a real world perspective.

APEC and OOXML - both pointless and annoying

Posted by Munir Kotadia @ 11:23 7 comments

The eyes of the world were on Australia this week as the APEC summit got underway in Sydney, and what they've seen is a city being held under virtual martial law — major roads blocked off, police cars outnumbering taxis and snipers openly hanging out on roof tops.

Making just as many headlines as George Bush's travelling circus has been Microsoft's failed attempt to fast-track its OOXML document format to the status of an ISO standard.

Both these events have been annoying and pointless. Neither has done anything but generate a huge amount of FUD (fear uncertainty and doubt).

Microsoft has spent a large part of this year gushing about the benefits of open standards. This is a complete turnaround from the Microsoft of a few years ago, which everyone loved to hate because of the company's lack of foresight and plain dumb arrogance.

Talking of dumb arrogance, APEC's star visitor George Bush seemed unable to grasp the incredible irony that a visit from the "leader of the free world" means his hosts are treated like convicted criminals.

"I think the great freedom of the city of Sydney is going to return quite rapidly," Bush was reported to have said today. Well thanks, Mr Bush. We look forward to your departure so we can carry on with our worthless lives.

Bush's attitude reminds me a great deal of Microsoft, when it had no real competition and could do what it liked. At the time, Redmond didn't bother pursuing international standards because the market fell into line with whatever technical decision it made.

These days, governments and organisations are finally coming round to the fact that it might not be a great idea to store all their documents in a format owned by a corporation that has already been found guilty of abusing its monopolistic powers.

Of course, it would take a brave person to bet against Microsoft winning the next OOXML ISO vote, which will most likely take place early next year.

One thing I would bet on though is that Canberra would have made a far more sensible venue for the APEC summit than Sydney.

Apart from not disrupting the lives of millions, Canberra is the national capital and was designed with politicians in mind.

I'm sure Bush — along with all the other world leaders — would have had far more fun playing with the ACT's abundance of fireworks, marijuana and porn.

Unfortunately, the circus had to be in Sydney and was hosted by a PM who probably won't even survive the next vote.

Will the same fate await Microsoft OOXML in 2008?

Advertisement

Talkback 7 comments

  1. Rock on Fergie -- 07/09/07

    Munir,

    Your wit is very much appreciated here in explaining the vanity & stupidity of both George W. Bush and Microsoft.

    Thanks!

    - ferg

  2. Yawn... Anonymous -- 08/09/07

    Yet another pointless ramble with only the barest attempt to give this column ANY credence (ie fleeting reference to OOXML), no 'news', no 'analysis' of the news, and bugger-all to do with security. It's insulting to think that this is the best that ZDNet has to offer!

    1. Well said... Anonymous -- 09/09/07

      Its almost amazing you get away with this pointless irrelevant garbage...

      You suggest Canberra as sensible? I tell you what its hard enough to get a hotel room in Canberra when parliament is sitting sometimes!

      Simple maths, there are not enough hotel rooms there to house all the APEC guests...

      Try blogging on the subject at hand and you might get the details right....

    2. Think about it pal Anonymous -- 11/09/07

      Think about it pal, this is not a news item. And, the man has a good point, think about what is happening in the world and how it is going to affect you next time the Govt decides to lick America's bottom. There are great implications if we continue to lick MS's, the world is only free when there are no governing tyrants and we are free to follow the fellows we think best lead.

  3. Is this zdnet? Anonymous -- 12/09/07

    This is one of the worst articles I've read on zdnet. I can't believe they paid you to write this pathetic article!

  4. I thought it was a rather good article Anonymous -- 13/09/07

    It drew parallels to the bullying and almighty attitude that the US President inflicts on everyone, to Microsoft's "We own you" corporate might. Neither which we have much of a choice, George W does whatever he pleases, and Microsoft's attitude is "If you don't like it.....bad luck"

    1. Think about this... Anonymous -- 13/09/07

      http://www.dfat.gov.au/trade/negotiations/us.html

Add your opinion


Munir Kotadia

Munir Kotadia

Producer

[+] Read bio

Latest Videos

ZDNet's CIO Vision Series

Department of Defence | Greg Farr, CIO (part two)

In the second part of his interview, Defence CIO Greg Farr talks about outsourcing, the skills crisis and reveals his most urgent IT priority.

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Tags

Back to top

Featured