Don't Fall for IT by Munir Kotadia

The world of tech is full of broken promises, marketing spin and schizophrenic behaviour. Munir Kotadia, editor of ZDNet Australia, attempts to bypass the drivel and tell IT like it is.

Tax Office needs to rethink open source objections

Posted by Munir Kotadia @ 12:58 6 comments

The Australian Tax Office CIO Bill Gibson claims that one of the reasons he hasn't deployed much open source software is due to security fears, with the code not subject to enough "technical scrutiny".

In order to watch video content you need to enable javascript and install Flash player version 8 or above.

"We are very, very focused on security and privacy and the obligations we have ... We would need to make sure that we are very comfortable through some form of technical scrutiny of what is inside such a product so that there is nothing unforeseen there," he told ZDNet.com.au in a video interview.

Will open source software ever become ubiquitous in government?

I find it interesting that Gibson trusts software from proprietary vendors who keep their code a secret but distrusts open source vendors, who lay out their code for anyone to see.

If this is the prevailing attitude among CIOs, it seems like the open source movement still has a very long struggle ahead.

The full interview with Gibson will be published today on the ZDNet.com.au CIO Vision Series page.

Talkback 6 comments

    Someone to blame Anonymous -- 18/03/08

    You/re obviously unfamiliar with the way public service works....

    When things go wrong, and they always eventually do, you need pass the buck.. i,e. its the softwares vendors fault, we weren't told, we'll sue...

    You don't get that option with open source, i.e. you're responsible. This is why open source has a hard road to travel, unless you get it from Red Hat or Novell

    you make no sense Anonymous -- 18/03/08 (in reply to #320097490)

    "You don't get that option with open source, i.e. you're responsible. This is why open source has a hard road to travel, unless you get it from Red Hat or Novell"

    So you are not alone and you can blame Red Hat or Novell. buy from them. simple. i think you have spent too much time in "public service"

    Public service is about... Anonymous -- 03/04/08

    I think "public service" is about providing quality services to citizens at the best price possible and not checking that you have someone to blame if something goes wrong.

    The impact of software choices on local economy should also be taken in consideration.

    Is the service better when public servants use a 400$ or 500$ MS Office software or just the same as with a 0$ OpenOffice ?

    What par of this n x 400$ goes in local economy and what part abroad ?

    boy are you deluded xBeanie -- 13/05/08 (in reply to #320099161)

    I have sat in a meeting where two options were deliberately and explicitly positioned to the manager as the more technically risky option and the more personally risky (to the managers career) option. Of course, like all good public service managers he immediately chose the more technically risky option where there was more chance of system failure but he would be able to deny any responsibility.

    Impact Of Software Vendors. Fitness -- 16/03/09 (in reply to #320099161)

    The local economy is always taken into consideration in providing quality services to the citizens at its best price with fit knowledge.

    We need to DEMAND open source from govt Graeme Harrison -- 05/09/08

    We need to demand, in the first instance that ALL govt depts comply with ISO standard formats within 18 months (ie Open Office over M$ office) including for all CV submissions etc.
    Then we need to insist that departments determine the max 20% of workstations that have a valid reason to not be an open source workstation, from operating system up.
    And we need to make sure that the Fed's laptops for all high school kids is done like the One Laptop Per Child project, using Ubuntu or another suitable purely-GUI Linux install.
    And we need ACCC to STOP under TPA the compulsory bundling of M$ OS with new computer sales. M$ knows that giving away the unpopular Shista OS is helping it claim market share (for FUD marketing) AND getting kids hooked on proprietary OSs, whereas the evidence is that most who change to Linux (eg Ubuntu) do NOT go back to proprietary software.

Add your opinion

Munir Kotadia

Munir Kotadia

Editor

[+] Read bio

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Tags

Back to top

Featured