Don't Fall for IT by Munir Kotadia

The world of tech is full of broken promises, marketing spin and schizophrenic behaviour. Munir Kotadia, editor of ZDNet Australia, attempts to bypass the drivel and tell IT like it is.

Ballmer's green comments make me sick

Posted by Munir Kotadia @ 17:49 6 comments

At the CeBIT exhibition in Germany this week, Steve Ballmer got on stage and told the world that Microsoft takes "green" issues seriously.

This was from the big banana of a company that, for as long as anyone can remember, has created software that is as greedy for PC resources as the Bush administration is for oil.

Ballmer even cited research from UK-based magazine PC Pro, which found that if a company ran 200 Vista-based PCs it would create less greenhouse gas emissions than if that same company used 200 Windows XP PCs. According to the research, this was entirely due to Vista's power management tools and nothing to do with how the PCs would perform while being used.

Cobblers! Windows Vista does not use fewer resources than XP.

For example, US IT services company Softchoice says Vista is the most power-hungry Windows desktop so far. Vista's minimum CPU requirements, according to the company, are 243 percent larger than that of XP.

Implying that Vista uses less power than XP is disingenuous and a sign of desperation.

Earlier this year, Ballmer said that the US$500 million -- yes, that's half a billion dollars -- Microsoft has already spent on marketing Vista wasn't enough and it needed to spend more to generate "consumer excitement".

If Microsoft really wants to excite its customers it should get back to basics and create genuinely innovative software -- instead of spouting increasingly unbelievable marketing claptrap.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Advertisement

Talkback 6 comments

  1. Microsoft and Green David W -- 08/03/08

    Munir comments are spot on. The grunt needed to run vista is embarrassing. Another angle to the green story is the (intentional?) need to upgrade a PC just to run Vista which results in more tech waste and more material and energy to make the new PCs.

    At least that activity generates a stream of older machines that can be re-birthed as Linux boxes!

    1. Rubbish Ben Gray -- 25/03/08

      Rubbish. Vista is good for the environment.

      Vista results in less greenhouse gases. I used to require a 1KW heater to heat up my entire house during winter.

      Now, I just use Windows Vista and run Notepad which puts my CPU and GPU into overdrive and heats up my study.

      Also, since Windows Vista takes 10 times longer to launch applications, I spend more time in my study on the computer, which means I don't have to heat up the rest of my house anymore.

      As an added bonus, since my printer does not work with Vista, I no longer use paper, which makes the greenies very happy.

      So to all those naysayers who claim Vista isn't 'green', I say you are ill informed.

      Regards,
      Ben

  2. I sure XP uses less resources than Vista.... Kaph -- 09/03/08

    "Cobblers! Windows XP does not use fewer resources than Windows Vista."
    Is this the right way around? Or am I missing your something here? By the way I am in full agreement on the rest of your post.

    1. Fixed Munir Kotadia -- 10/03/08

      Thanks for spotting that Kaph, i have corrected that line.

    2. No worries :) Kaph -- 10/03/08

      Thanks for not pointing out that I missed a "was" in the subject line!

  3. More dumb stories from Munir Ben -- 02/04/08

    "Vista's minimum CPU requirements, according to the company, are 243 percent larger than that of XP.

    Implying that Vista uses less power than XP is disingenuous and a sign of desperation."

    So on one line, he implies that Vista is 243% worse for the environment, and then on the next accuses Microsoft of being disingenguous.
    Trust me kids, keep reading Munir's columns and you WILL get dumber.
    The amount of power a computer uses when the CPU is at 10% (the average amount it takes to email, use Word, or do basically anything else), as compared to when it's at 1% (doing nothing) is very little. Munir has obviously decided to overlook the fact that decent power management DOES make a much bigger difference.

    I mean, taken to its extreme, you guys want to install an OS that takes up virtually no CPU while it's doing nothing? Or even while it's doing something? Go find a copy of DOS. Guaranteed minimal use of system resources.

    I'm not saying that Vista, MS or Ballmer are great people, companies or software. I'm saying Munir Kotada is a terrible journalist who is obviously jumping on a band-wagon (MS is bad? That's an original story - Oh, and the dig at George Bush? Another original move) rather than looking deeper in to the story and doing ANALYSIS.
    You know, like a journalist?

Add your opinion


Munir Kotadia

Munir Kotadia

Editor

[+] Read bio

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Tags

Back to top

Featured