Big Picture by Sheryle Moon

As children, parents and teachers were our mentors, but as adults in the working world, mentors can be hard to find. In Big Picture, industry leaders share their views, experience, advice and tips on making today’s followers tomorrow’s leaders.

Male-dominated workforce costs AU $47bn a year

Posted by Sheryle Moon @ 16:14 15 comments

Restricting women's job opportunities costs the Asia Pacific region up to $47 billion each year.

This startling figure was revealed in a report by the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, released in April, which also suggests that, as a nation's female employment rate rises, so does its GDP.

With that in mind, Australia's ICT industry has a golden opportunity to increase our productivity by increasing the participation rate of women. Currently, less than 18 percent of all ICT employees are women -- and this number is falling.

For many women, the male-dominated culture in the ICT industry goes hand-in-hand with a "glass ceiling", and they feel they have to work harder than male colleagues to achieve success. The "old boys club" approach in some parts of the industry -- with its informal male networking -- also contributes to the perceived or real exclusion of women from many high-technology job opportunities.

So, what can we do to turn the tide?

One of the AIIA activities I am involved in is a program, Set Up for Success, dedicated to providing women with the skills to succeed in a male-dominated working environment, and the main skills we are trying to impart are:

(1) Negotiation. Women employees across Australia's economy earn just 83 cents for every dollar their male counterpart earns, so clearly, women can benefit from enhanced skills to enable them to negotiate salary packages and working conditions.
(2) Self-promotion. Women often take the modest approach where they believe they will be rewarded for good work without self-promotion. Instead, they need to learn to not just "stand there" but "stand out".
(3) Work/life balance. The fast pace of life has become frantic for many women. We need to provide skills and training to help women gain and maintain work/life balance.

Is all this effort designed to get women into IT just for the sake of getting women into IT?

No, as the aforementioned study shows, women are extremely valuable contributors to growth. As we confront rapidly changing patterns of paid work opportunities and work time arrangements, it is often those companies and industries perceived to care about the "people" aspect of business -- such as work/life issues -- that attract and retain the best talent.

Advertisement

Talkback 15 comments

    Perhaps they don't want to work in IT? Damian S -- 27/06/07

    Has anyone ever stepped back to think that rather than being a product of a glass ceiling or old-boys club, there are significantly fewer females in IT because they don't want to work in IT?

    Ratios for nursing and primary school teaching are as low, if not lower, than those in IT, but the other way around (ie: women drastically outnumber men).

    I'd love to see more females in IT, who wouldn't? But I don't want to see women in IT just to make up numbers, I want to see them if they want to be there, and are capable and competent at undertaking the work, not simply fluff around the edges (such as working in a sales/marketing role).

    That's the whole point of the article! Peter -- 27/06/07 (in reply to #320081670)

    Saying that there are few women in IT because women don't want to work in IT is merely stating the #$*% obvious!

    I am assuming that the UN estimate of the economic cost cited in the article is reasonably well calculated and not just something they made up over a few beers at the bar. So the question is how to make IT more attractive to women. Nobody has said anything about just making up the numbers.

    GBO - Glimpse of the Blindingly Obvious Damian S -- 27/06/07 (in reply to #320081675)

    Apparently it's not that " #$*% obvious" to quote you, Peter, otherwise there wouldn't be a constant stream of articles about it.

    I don't want to go and work as a hairdresser - yet you might argue that there are many, MANY more female hairdressers than male ones... Nothing they do for that career path to make it seem more attractive (and god bless hairdressers, they do a fabulous job) would make me want to become one.

    You seem to have missed my point totally - I suggest you check your baggage at the door and reread my first post.

    Not true Peter -- 28/06/07 (in reply to #320081696)

    The comparison between IT and hairdressing is invalid, since the lack of male hairdressers probably doesn't make any difference to the $47 billion lost productivity quoted by OECD (i.e. since having your hair done probably doesn't contribute much to productivity in general).

    It is also simplistic to assume that the lack of women in IT is because of some natural predisposition away from it. Of course there are some women like this, but there are many who wouldn't mind working in IT at all - but are put off by things like 'glass ceilings', isolation from being in a minority, and negative attitudes from male peers (according to various studies in science and management journals).

    If these issues were solved, productivity could be improved. But to solve it requires not thinking in black and white that "all men are like this" and "all women are like that".

    What's wrong with the kitchen Anonymous -- 27/06/07 (in reply to #320081675)

    You've got your kitchen, you should be happy... ha ha ha

    Perhaps they do? Anonymous -- 21/07/07 (in reply to #320081670)

    but can't due to blatant ageism+sexism welded into the recruitment process - it's a bloody tragedy, worst example I know of is someone with over 20+ years IT experience, now locked out, permanently. "Skills shortage" - hah!

    Inept Management Anonymous -- 27/06/07

    I agree with this article. The 'glass ceiling' does exist and it can be for all those reasons and also because male management cannot manage women and recognize talent in women.
    At my previous job I wanted to apply for a more senior role because I was doing exactly the same work as my male colleagues but paid less and I had been there for 2 years, I was the only female in a team of 10 people. However, my team lead (male) told me I was too emotional (I would say passionate/enthusiastic etc) and that I needed to work on this and if I succeeded, my application would be considered. My technical knowledge - no problem, the work I completed - perfect and on time, relationship with colleagues - great. I just had to work on this personality glitch.
    So I resigned, left the company and got a job paying me twice as much.
    I could not say anything or complain to management or HR because I did not want to leave on a negative note and this industry is so small, I did not want to jeopardise my career prospects.
    Its just the culture of the industry - you have to have a thick skin, learn from it and move on.

    Contradictionary Anonymous -- 24/10/07 (in reply to #320081686)

    So you are saying that the glass ceiling exists, and yet you can still leave your job and get one that pays twice as much? Man, that's a glass ceiling I'd love to be up against.

    Welcome to the IT world, I don't think in my 10+ years in IT my salary has ever moved up radically, just the same few % every year. It's been well known that the only way to get a good salary boost (whether male or female) is to change jobs, which AFAICS you did just like every male out there.

    This is just following the current trend where making the accusation of anti-minority behaviour, no matter how unfounded, is enough as opposed to having to actually make a case. Does anyone really think that the CEO of these companies come down and tells the HR department not to hire women or non-whites? The fact that hiring practices are equal isn't enough, women, and every other type of minority still has to make the unfounded claim that they are discriminated against.

    At least the main article was honest enough to note that reduced salaries are due to women not bargaining enough over salary. However, what does the author intend to do about men who only earn .83 cents of their co-workers? Shouldn't they also receive the same skills to negotiate or are they exempt due to a lack of a ****

    While this issue is about 49Billion in lost productivity, the idea of summoning this missing manpower from women is ridiculous. Where are you more likely to find this missing talent, from the gender that is more likely to be interested in it, or the gender that has no interest in it?

    Peter, not only have they got you believing in a glass ceiling, you are also apologizing for it already.

    Also, how come these studies never compare the amount of time men vs. women have off from work for one reason or another, doctors visits, sick time, maternity leave.

    Salary and the glass ceiling Anonymous -- 29/11/07 (in reply to #320088540)

    As a woman in the IT industry, I have had to ask , demand, negotiate, and sometimes threaten for more money. I knew I was paid less then my male counterparts and had the choice to do something about it. Get more money or move on. Most men don't think twice about asking for a raise, but women need to cultivate their inner b#tch at times and stand up open your mouth.

    Not just 'glass ceillings' Anonymous -- 29/06/07

    In my opinion, the issue isn't merely 'glass ceillings'.
    I've never had an issue working in IT or networking with my male counterparts (although at first is was a bit overwhelming). I've found that ultimately, it's the skills and knowledge that people (male or female) bring that makes them a valuable employee. I personally believe that most people discount the fact that many women will take time off to raise their children. I think that this is a major factor in the small percentage of women in IT. It's just an industry that is not simpathetic to people who take time off.

    Its the same with cars! Anonymous -- 02/07/07

    When a car breaks, blokes stand around the motor, beers in hand, bonding over the possible reasons as to why it broke. Why not push more women into being mechanics? Besides, the guys don't make it easy. Think of a barbeque, where the guys have to stand around cooking the damn thing and drinking the beer, expecting the women to be in the kitchen fixing the salad. God forbid a woman who attempts to turn a snag!

    Its the same with gadgets, where egos are measured on the basis of who has the most sophisticated and latest technology (usually of which they are incapable of completely understanding), or who has the most expensive car. The fact is that men are wierd, and being a woman and having to be immersed in that weird competitive world of gadgetry is hard work! We don't have the paraphenalia that you guys have, and we don't have to stand around comparing the size of our hard disks! There would only be more women in IT if men gave up their gadget obsession and stopped basing their manhood on what they (think they) know!

    yawn Anonymous -- 12/07/07

    everythings mens fault....

    male behaviour - always wrong.
    female behaviour - always right.

    Mate..... Anonymous -- 15/07/07 (in reply to #320082605)

    ...you must be new around here .

    :)

    Incorrect Clare Aldreman -- 25/09/07

    I actually read somewhere that it was costing AU $49.1bn.

    Poor reporting.

Add your opinion

Sheryle Moon

Sheryle Moon

CEO, Australian Information Industry Association

[+] Read bio

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Tags

Back to top

Featured