Big Deal by Angus Kidman

Industry veteran Angus Kidman casts his cynical eye over what passes for news in the world of ICT. He exposes the deep disconnect between what vendors claim is the next big thing and what IT managers are really looking for to help them do their job. This often bitter and twisted rant comes to you courtesy of ZDNet Australia and any venue game enough to host Kidman during his extensive travels.

Office vision still unclear

Posted by Angus Kidman @ 10:11 4 comments

As you'd expect given Microsoft Office's near-ubiquitous position in the modern workplace, my comments on the company's plans for the recently delayed 2007 release stirred up a few readers.

One poster took me to task for suggesting that the no-menus-here interface would be a hindrance to existing users, asking: "If it was so good before, why did 80 percent of requests for new functionality in Word 2007 already exist in Word 2003?"

Actually, the answer to that one's quite simple. While Microsoft is happy to proffer figures like that which suggest that there's lots of hidden goodness just waiting to get unlocked, it isn't so keen to disclose just how many people are making the request. As such, we have no way of knowing whether it's only a tiny minority of idiots who can't find a particular feature, or whether it downright sucks and practically no-one can work it out. I suspect the former, following the well-known principle that empty vessels make the most noise.

Speaking of noise, at the original Office 2007 press demonstration, Microsoft suggested that I e-mail my complaints about the new interface to them, saying that they'd get back to me with some more specific suggestions about how power users could adopt to the new interface. So far, I've heard nothing -- but given that the release date for Office 2007 has been further delayed since then, perhaps that's no great surprise.

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

    MS Office 2007 Anonymous -- 13/07/06 (in reply to #120137926)

    Why pay MS for another "upgrade" when you can do the same thing with OpenOffice 2.x which is available as a free download ?
    Also its backwards compatible with the older MS Office files which is more then you could say about the MS version.

    MS Office 2007 Anonymous -- 17/07/06

    How can we, the general public and licensed users of MS products, communicate with MS about our opinions, needs, preferences, outrages?

    Is there an e-mail address that we can use?

    I have a few issues that I would like to take up, and they aren't just limited to Office. For the latter it concerns Outlook which is supposedly the core of any office system, eg, appointments, contacts, e-mail, tasks without an effective continuous and/or incremental backup mechanism. Hardly the essense of a robust application of strategic importance to any small business. For example how does a small business cope when all of todays appointments, tasks, new contacts and e-mails, get corrupted before the next backup? In this context don't think of appointment as a meeting with your colleagues, but instead an off site meeting for an estimate or with a client.

    contact the editor ZDNet Editor -- 21/07/06 (in reply to #120138189)

    hi there, drop me a note at fran.foo@zdnet.com.au and i'll put you in touch with someone at microsoft.

    Fran Foo
    Managing Editor
    ZDNet.com.au

    Re-training? Anonymous -- 20/07/06

    As I'm sure has been mentioned before, the requirement of training of existing users to this upgrade negates the arguement against training users for OpenOffice use, ignoring the cost difference of course.

Add your opinion

Angus Kidman

Angus Kidman

 

[+] Read bio

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Tags

Back to top

Featured